• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Son of Man

SoyLeche

meh...
Christ refers to himself many times as the "Son of Man". What does this mean to you? How is Christ the "Son of Man" - especially since his only mortal parent was a woman, not a man?
 

SoyLeche

meh...
From the LDS "Guide to the Scriptures"

GUIDE TO THE SCRIPTURES
SON OF MAN See also God, Godhead; Jesus Christ
A title that Jesus Christ used when speaking of himself (Luke 9: 22; Luke 21: 36). It meant the Son of the Man of Holiness. Man of Holiness is one of the names of God the Father. When Jesus called himself the Son of Man, it was an open declaration of his divine relationship with the Father. This title is found frequently in the Gospels. Latter-day revelation confirms the special meaning and sacredness of this name of the Savior (D&C 45: 39; 49: 6, 22; 58: 65; Moses 6: 57).
 

muichimotsu

Holding All and None
I've heard that Son of Man can also be translated as Son of Adam, which would suggest that jesus is somehow more human in nature than divine, and yet...I forget specifically what my professor spoke of concerning Son of Adam, except that it could have connected to something about jesus suffering for Adam's sins, potentially.
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
From wiki:

Geza Vermes, professor emeritus of Jewish studies at Wolfson College, Oxford, has argued that "the son of man" in the Gospels is unrelated to these Hebrew Bible usages. He begins with the observation that there is no example of "the" son of man in Hebrew sources. He suggests that the term originates in Aramaic — bar nasha. Based on his study of Aramaic sources, he concludes that in these sources and in the Christian Bible, "son of man" is simply a synonym for man, and a substitute for the indefinite pronoun ("one"). Based on context, he claims that one should translate "bar nasha" as someone, anyone or I. He further argues that "son of man" is in no way a title.
Although the Aramaic "bar nasha" can be translated generically, as somebody or anyone, the expression may have been recognized as a title if it were used within a Hebrew sentence.
 

Adstar

Active Member
The Son of man is a title:

Daniel 7
9 “ I watched till thrones were put in place,
And the Ancient of Days was seated;
His garment was white as snow,
And the hair of His head was like pure wool.
His throne was a fiery flame,
Its wheels a burning fire;
10 A fiery stream issued
And came forth from before Him.
A thousand thousands ministered to Him;
Ten thousand times ten thousand stood before Him.
The court[b] was seated,
And the books were opened.

13 “ I was watching in the night visions,
And behold, One like the Son of Man,
Coming with the clouds of heaven!
He came to the Ancient of Days,
And they brought Him near before Him.
14 Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom,
That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion,
Which shall not pass away,
And His kingdom the one
Which shall not be destroyed.


All Praise The Ancient Of Days
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
From:-http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/son-of-man.html
Jesus Christ "Son of Man"
This sounds like some kind of contradiction at first glance, but in fact there is no contradiction. An examination of Scripture reveals that the phrase "Son of Man" carries broad significance.

First of all, even if the phrase "Son of Man" is a reference to Jesus' humanity, it is not a denial of His deity. By becoming a man, Jesus did not cease being God. The incarnation of Christ did not involve the subtraction of deity, but the addition of humanity. Jesus clearly claimed to be God on many occasions (Matthew 16:16,17; John 8:58; 10:30). But in addition to being divine, He was also human (see Philippians 2:6-8). He had two natures (divine and human) conjoined in one person.
Further, Scripture indicates that Jesus was not denying His deity by referring to Himself as the Son of Man. In fact, it is highly revealing that the term "Son of Man" is used in Scripture in contexts of Christ's deity. For example, the Bible says that only God can forgive sins (Isaiah 43:25; Mark 2:7). But as the "Son of Man," Jesus had the power to forgive sins (Mark 2:10). Likewise, Christ will return to earth as the "Son of Man" in clouds of glory to reign on earth (Matthew 26:63-64). In this passage, Jesus is citing Daniel 7:13 where the Messiah is described as the "Ancient of Days," a phrase used to indicate His deity (cf. Daniel 7:9).
Further, when Jesus was asked by the high priest whether He was the "Son of God" (Matthew 26:63), He responded affirmatively, declaring that He was the "Son of Man" who would come in power and great glory (verse 64). This indicated that Jesus Himself used the phrase "Son of Man" to indicate His deity as the Son of God.
Finally, the phrase "Son of Man" also emphasizes who Jesus is in relation to His incarnation and His work of salvation. In the Old Testament (Leviticus 25:25-26, 48-49; Ruth 2:20), the next of kin (one related by blood) always functioned as the "kinsman-redeemer" of a family member who needed redemption from jail. Jesus became related to us "by blood" (that is, He became a man) so He could function as our Kinsman-Redeemer and rescue us from sin.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Swiss, Geneva, Sans Serif][SIZE=-1][ If this information has been helpful, please prayerfully consider a donation to help pay the expenses for making this faith-building service available to you and your family! Donations are tax-deductible. ][/SIZE][/FONT]
Author: Dr. Ron Rhodes of Reasoning from the Scriptures Ministries.
Copyright, 1999, Ron Rhodes.
 

Booko

Deviled Hen
SoyLeche said:
Christ refers to himself many times as the "Son of Man". What does this mean to you? How is Christ the "Son of Man" - especially since his only mortal parent was a woman, not a man?

In the Tenach, "son of man" is a title sometimes applied to
a prophet. See especially Ezekiel. That's what several Jews have told me, anyway.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
SoyLeche said:
From the LDS "Guide to the Scriptures"

GUIDE TO THE SCRIPTURES
SON OF MAN See also God, Godhead; Jesus Christ
A title that Jesus Christ used when speaking of himself (Luke 9: 22; Luke 21: 36). It meant the Son of the Man of Holiness. Man of Holiness is one of the names of God the Father. When Jesus called himself the Son of Man, it was an open declaration of his divine relationship with the Father. This title is found frequently in the Gospels. Latter-day revelation confirms the special meaning and sacredness of this name of the Savior (D&C 45: 39; 49: 6, 22; 58: 65; Moses 6: 57).
I see the Son of Man as referring to Jesus as being the literal Son of the archetypal Man, our Father in Heaven.
 
Top