• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another anti religious shooter

Saint_of_Me

Member
Atheists do actually have the most blood on their hands - orders of magnitude more blood.

There are the small timers nuts like the Atheist Jeffrey Dahmer, Alfred Kinsey, Jim Jones...


Try googling the names...
from Napoleon Bonaparte to
Than Shwe
Kim Jong II (killed 4 million)
Benito Mussolini
Mao Zedong (killed 20-70 million)
Pol Pot (killed around 2 million)
Joseph Stalin (somewhere between 2 - 10 million people) - October revolution
North Korea, China, Russia - these are the atheist run countries...
Atheist communist regimes have killed between 40-260 million people in the last 100 years.
Reign of terror of the french revolution and the "cult of reason"... Rousseau (300,000 murders?)



the most secular century in human history has been the bloodiest...

here is a summary of democide totals:
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.TAB16A.1.GIF


LOL...I need not Google anything.

As I have already made my point, in spades!

And that is....religion is murderous. As are millions of people who have waged violence in the name of their superstitious-based god.

The fact that atheists can also be murderous tyrants means nothing, and in no way derails my point. Or the several posts I have made proving the first sentence in THIS post.
 

Wirey

Fartist
LOL...I need not Google anything.

As I have already made my point, in spades!

And that is....religion is murderous. As are millions of people who have waged violence in the name of their superstitious-based god.

The fact that atheists can also be murderous tyrants means nothing, and in no way derails my point. Or the several posts I have made proving the first sentence in THIS post.

And how humbly you present yourself.
 
Top