• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What do people think "atheist" means?

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
I would think 'Doesn't believe in God' to be a more common definition of 'atheism - and less problematic.
But still don't see the point of trying to establish a single 'correct' definition - what is the point? It would not be possible to enforce such a thing, other definitions would remain in use anyway.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Which atheists have a belief that at least one god exists?
Well if you use the word 'atheist' as Dawkins, Hitchens and many other popular writers have done all theists would be in that group.

Justin Martyr, pne of the earliest theologians used the same definition and context way back in the 2nd century;


"Hence are we called atheists. And we confess that we are atheists, so far as gods of this sort are concerned, but not with respect to the most true God"

So according to that usage, all theists are atheists that believe one God exists.
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
I would think 'Doesn't believe in God' to be a more common definition of 'atheism - and less problematic.
Doesn't believe in GODS! GODS! PLURAL! AS IN ALL GODS! EVERY GOD! After all these posts you haven't even picked that up!?
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Doesn't believe in GODS! GODS! PLURAL! AS IN ALL GODS! EVERY GOD! After all these posts you haven't even picked that up!?
I am not obliged to pick it up mate. I don't think your definition is either common, or particularly sound.
Why would I have to use the definition you insist on, even though it does not reflect my position?
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
So according to that usage, all theists are atheists that believe one God exists.
LOL a theist is a person who believes at least one god exists, an atheist doesn't believe any gods exist. Of course you can say that a person is a theist regarding one god and an atheist regarding all other gods but that is just word play with no bearing on the definitions.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
LOL a theist is a person who believes at least one god exists, an atheist doesn't believe any gods exist. Of course you can say that a person is a theist regarding one god and an atheist regarding all other gods but that is just word play with no bearing on the definitions.
What on earth made you think you can make other people adopt your prefered definition?
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
I am not obliged to pick it up mate. I don't think your definition is either common, or particularly sound.
Why would I have to use the definition you insist on, even though it does not reflect my position?
If you believe gods don't exist then just say you're a "strong atheist" because the definition of a "strong atheist" is a person who believes gods don't exist. Continuing using "atheist" when you mean "strong atheist" will just make you look foolish in the eyes of every knowledgeable atheist and confirm the biblical definition.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
If you believe gods don't exist then just say you're a "strong atheist" because the definition of a "strong atheist" is a person who believes gods don't exist. Continuing using "atheist" when you mean "strong atheist" will just make you look foolish in the eyes of every knowledgeable atheist and confirm the biblical definition.
No it won't mate. The whole 'strong and weak' atheism idea is not very popular at all, in fact it is mostly found only in Christian apologetics, not in the atheist community. Personally I think it is a useless distinction.
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
What on earth made you think you can make other people adopt your prefered definition?
I don't think I can make other people adopt that definition. If you want to look like a fool in the eyes of every atheist who knows the difference between weak and strong atheism please feel free.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
I don't think I can make other people adopt that definition. If you want to look like a fool in the eyes of every atheist who knows the difference between weak and strong atheism please feel free.
Why would I even care ? Words have many meanings - just ask whoever you are talking to what they mean.
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
No it won't mate. The whole 'strong and weak' atheism idea is not very popular at all, in fact it is mostly found only in Christian apologetics, not in the atheist community. Personally I think it is a useless distinction.
LOL! A person who doesn't believe gods exist is a weak atheist. We just don't bother to say "weak".
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
From dear departed Granma comes memories of the olde christian songs.
She had some of the euro-belque throat to her singing, kinda Frenchy sounding.
I had a large impression of the cross in my mind for a long while.
And there were a few in Belgees, she was Belgium, I knew a few words myself.
~
I heard those songs over and over and over.....
My Granma raised me until I was 5, spoke FrenchehBelque can of like broken dishes to me.
I saw cradles falling from trees, and babies falling, and heaven, and all that crap.
~
All those songs started sounding perverse, all about prayers and death !
And of course, heaven; should that be capitolized ?
~
That stuff plus losing Santa and the bunnies, and growing up....
I don't believe in heaven, angels, bugles in heaven, thrones in the Cosmos,
pink unicorns, ghosts, and any other whisp of essense of nothingness.
~
I just believe in the earth and the Cosmos in which I swim, no other entity needed.
I guess that brands me to be an Atheist / I am what I am / "who said that?"
NuffStuff
~
'mud
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
Doesn't believe in GODS! GODS! PLURAL! AS IN ALL GODS! EVERY GOD! After all these posts you haven't even picked that up!?
The word a-the-ist isn't plural for "God". It's not even singular. Besides, the word "God" didn't exist when the word "atheos" (singular, athei plural) was used the first time. So how can we even be sure that "theos" should be translated to the 17th c. proto-Germanic/old-English God or gods?
 
Top