SpeaksForTheTrees
Well-Known Member
Only the way things could turn out .Do you mean not the only way things could turn out?
Prefare my way one less word .
Meaning it's Not, the only way things could turn out .
So no I think
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Only the way things could turn out .Do you mean not the only way things could turn out?
Hi George
For Judaism, it is not enough to simply proclaim yourself as the future messiah. Thousands of people throughout history have done that. Words are not enough. Jews require actions. Once you rebuild the Temple, cause the World to become peaceful, and bring all the Jews back to Israel, then we would be willing to entertain your claim.
Want ? Only time I ever want usually involves bathrooms
Want ,is a primitive knee jerk reaction
Christians lol I was taught by Angels the end times/days second coming yada yada is only the way things could turn out , not a given ..
I enjoy my style of writing is a kick in the face to the Oxford dictionary and those silly hats with tassles.It's hard to understand you with your lurid lack of grammar... but I will try and give you a rebuttal.
Christ is a Person!
The End Times are now.
The Christ is alive and speaking (to you right now).
The Jews were correct, Jesus is not their Messiah.
Messiah is now here to redeem the (believing) Jews.
No one religion has it all correct, but no one religion has it all wrong (in My honest opinion).
Religion will fade away in the future, but most people will be spiritual.
The Creator created the universe. (I agree with the deists on this).
If God exists, God in His entirety is unfathomable.
Messiah is your Friend.
The End is when there is no more Life. We all experience the End.
We will be reincarnated after Messiah passes, so the End is only a new Beginning, in My humble opinion.
The only thing we understand is the now.
Time is an illusion.
Science is only in its infancy.
We will travel the cosmos, we will not stay on Earth forever.
We are all gods.
The angels believe in Me, the Christ.
There will be a new Earth.
Our government is obsolete.
The world's currence is fiat monopoly money.
The Rothschilds will be exposed by Farmer God Christ.
The only certainty is change and uncertainty.
We could be living in a simulation.
There will be an AI singularity in the not so distant future.
The star-like UFOs indeed move around.
Aliens are real, and aliens can be invisible or translucent (and I know this from My personal encounter with an entity).
The government and science will have to disclose the fact that ET is ubiquitous throughout the cosmos.
Science is postulating that there could be an infinite amount of universes in the so-called multiverse, or the universe is infinite.
I am the Prophet of My people- the angels.
We will be able to travel faster than light.
The USA government puts fluoridate in tap water, and fluoride is a proven toxic poison and lowers people's IQs.
Chemtrails are a fact, and airplanes are allegedly spraying aluminum and other chemicals into the atmosphere.
The government is not your friend.
There will be My global online government in the future.
I am the King of My global online government.
Its going to get worse before it gets better.
There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth because of Me.
I could go on, but this is sufficient for now.
The Truth could be stranger than fiction?
~PEACE~
I enjoy my style of writing is a kick in the face to the Oxford dictionary and those silly hats with tassles.
Defiant English is the style and no you may not start using it .
Your list, was nothing on there I am not already aware of.
Conspiracy Theories , Paranoia
I hate this language , time for some new words imho .
English been used to deceive so many sorry pal but if you want hang with me you need to accept my ways.
Why would you think quoting Romans credible, much less clever?Romans 11
Why would you think quoting Romans credible, much less clever?
Reason. Given the following:What makes you think it isn't either?
Transcendental Base Insights:
- All 1st Basemen are pathetic fools.
- There will be many - even more foolish - who will deny this truth.
Reason. Given the following:
Do I really need to explain to you why Item 2 above is worthless evidence of Item 1 or of Base Insights as a whole? If so, shame on you.
That is an entirely different question, having nothing to do with the credibility/viability of circular reasoning.Well, you know why I think it is holy scripture. I'm asking you why you don't think it is.
If Harry Potter quoted Isaiah, it wouldn't make me doubt Isaiah even if I think of Harry Potter as fiction.Well, you know why I think it is holy scripture. I'm asking you why you don't think it is.
And surely you do accept Deut. 29:4, Isaiah 29:10, Psalm 69:22,23, Isaiah 59:20,21; 27:9, Jer. 31:33,34, Isaiah 40:13 and Job 41:11 as holy scripture, all requoted OT verses in Romans 11?
That is an entirely different question, having nothing to do with the credibility/viability of circular reasoning.
If Harry Potter quoted Isaiah, it wouldn't make me doubt Isaiah even if I think of Harry Potter as fiction.
The logic might be rational but the text isn't authoritative. I can reach all sorts of logical conclusions after citing biblical text. Would each and every one of them therefore be right, persuasive or gospel? Or would you look at the source and say "you have no position to speak on this issue."So you do accept the OT verses requoted by Paul in Romans 11 as holy, right?
Harry Potter has made no attempt to rationalize these scriptures like Paul has done in Romans 11. The logic there is rational yet you still don't believe it?
The logic might be rational but the text isn't authoritative. I can reach all sorts of logical conclusions after citing biblical text. Would each and every one of them therefore be right, persuasive or gospel? Or would you look at the source and say "you have no position to speak on this issue."
What logic? Stringing together selected quotes from disparate text. Seriously?If his logic is rational ...
I DO judge the author by what he has written. he has written things that are completely against Judaism. That makes his argument flawed. So he can make all sorts of OTHER rational statements, but as a source, his bias affects the validity of the rational conclusions he draws.No, sir. I am only discussing Romans 11.
You say that "The logic might be rational." Why do you question the author instead of what the author wrote? It is fallacy to do that. Surely you know this.
Judge the author on what the author has written, okay? He obviously is well versed in OT scripture. If his logic is rational why then do you cast it out without serious prayer and consideration?
What logic? Stringing together selected quotes from disparate text. Seriously?
I DO judge the author by what he has written. he has written things that are completely against Judaism. That makes his argument flawed. So he can make all sorts of OTHER rational statements, but as a source, his bias affects the validity of the rational conclusions he draws.