• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Buddha Explains Universal Mind

atanu

Member
Premium Member
I'm still not clear what you mean by a consciousness "beyond" the aggregates, given that consciousness is itself an aggregate.

You are confused because of different understanding of the word 'Consciousness'. Can experience of void happen without consciousness?

You are confused because the Sanskrit word used in original sutras is vijnana (vinnana in Pali) and not consciousness, as translated most commonly. Consciousness in its non dual root aspect is called prajnana in Sanskrit (panna in Pali).

Vijnana is a compound word made of vi (divided) and jnana (knowledge). Prajnana is made of pra (pre) and jnana (knowledge). Vijnana and prajnana both together constitute the principle of awareness/consciousness.

Is experience of void possible in absence of a jnana (knowledge) principle being inherent in the void?
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
I was giving you a rather large clue. If you know anything about Vaisnava thought you might be able to piece it together. Non-duality does not mean quite the same thing to them as it does to you.

You keep beating around the bush. Can you, or can't you, tell us why you think the self is real? I don't care what Vaisnava thought says about it; I want to know why YOU think the self is real.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Your arrogance truly knows no limits. If that shift in consciousness made me sound like you then I'd much rather be sitting around with the shadows of shadows...

You see? Still attacking the pointing finger, while providing no substantive response, because you have none! So I will take your non-response as "I don't understand Vivekenanda's statement because my conditioned awareness won't allow me to recognize it as being true."
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
You keep beating around the bush. Can you, or can't you, tell us why you think the self is real? I don't care what Vaisnava thought says about it; I want to know why YOU think the self is real.
I could not explain why I see the self as a distinct reality in under 10,000 words. I'm just not into doing that for you. IF you understood anything about Vaisnava thought, as I said, it would give a HINT at what I am expressing... as what I perceive now is not what Vaisnava thought teaches.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
GNG continually refers to "Cosmic Consciousness" and it's clearly central to his belief system, but he refuses to say what he actually means by it. I think that's very odd.

In a nutshell, CC is the realization of oneness with the universe, rather than identifying with the limited self known as 'I', which sees the universe as some 'other'.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Though, in some terms, I am a universe unto myself, I am not THE universe.

Where does your universe end and the THE universe begin?

You are still thinking 'yours and mine', 'this and that', in typical dualistic fashion.

If you understood that everything is consciousness, you would also understand that you ARE the universe as well. Only when we are fooled by the illusion of form do we discriminate 'this' as opposed to 'that'. The Buddha was not so fooled, hence:

'form is emptiness;
emptiness is form'

'You are not just the drop in the ocean; you are the Mighty Ocean itself."
Rumi
 
Last edited:

godnotgod

Thou art That
I could not explain why I see the self as a distinct reality in under 10,000 words. I'm just not into doing that for you. IF you understood anything about Vaisnava thought, as I said, it would give a HINT at what I am expressing... as what I perceive now is not what Vaisnava thought teaches.

Stop mystifying the issue with smokescreens! Tell us why the self is real in 50 words or less.
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
In a nutshell, CC is the realization of oneness with the universe, rather than identifying with the limited self known as 'I', which sees the universe as some 'other'.

From this it sounds like CC is the experience of abandoning self view, and not some kind of consciousness which "permeates" the universe.

And yet above you say: "If you understood that everything is consciousness....", which seems to contradict this.

So which is it? A proper definition or explanation of CC is still needed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

godnotgod

Thou art That
No, for the squirrel there is just the nut.
Then the squirrel buries the nut and later in the year digs it up, hence:
"First there is a nut, then there is no nut, then there is". :p

or....

'first there is Cosmic Consciousness;
then there is no Cosmic Consciousness;
then there is'


(the second part is where Spiny is at):p
 

Makaranda

Active Member
I did not claim that stilling the mind leads to the understanding of non-duality....I say that stilling the mind leads to the realization of non-duality..

So swap the word understanding with the word realization. My point still stands. Why quibble with words?

Non-duality is not an experience...but if that is your claim...what is experiencing it?

This wasnt my claim.

Samadhi means different things to different traditions....what is your definition?

Mind free from the triputi of knower, means of knowledge, and known object. The reflected consciousness in the mind becomes revealed in its pure state. This is according to Advaita but I dont insist that others must interpret the experience in the same way.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
So CC is the experience of abandoning self view, and not some kind of consciousness which "permeates" the universe?

In the dissolution of 'self view', universal view becomes apparent, unless, of course, one is still laboring under self-view, but thinking he is not.
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
then there is no Cosmic Consciousness;
then there is'

You still haven't provided a coherent definition of Cosmic Consciousness. One minute you're talking about everything being consciousness, the next about abandoning self-view, it's a muddle.

You need to provide a coherent definition of "Cosmic Consciousness". Are you saying that everything is consciousness, or that consciousness permeates the universe, or that it's the experience of abandoning self view, or what exactly?

Are you even capable of explaining clearly what you believe? I'm beginning to wonder.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
In the dissolution of 'self view', universal view becomes apparent, unless, of course, one is still laboring under self-view, but thinking he is not.

And what does this "universal view" actually look like? What is your actual experience of it?
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Only when it's being pointed in the wrong direction. I'm fed up with the continual cliched references to pointing fingers, it's too often used as a cop-out by people who can't explain themselves clearly and then get defensive when the inadequacy of their explanation is pointed out. It's often also said in a rather arrogant way, "How dare you suggest that I'm pointing in the wrong direction!"

The finger isn't pointing in the wrong direction; you're just looking in the wrong direction.:p
 
Top