• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do Christians reject any suggestions the Bride of Christ is a member of the Church of Christ?

Excalibur

Member
The subject title can read like this: "Why do Christians reject any suggestions that the Bride of Christ can also be a member of the Church congregation, instead of a metaphor to describe the Church as a whole? (Revelation 19:7-9)"

Revelation Chapter 19

7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.

8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.

9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed [are] they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.

Revelation 21:2 - And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Conventional theology will tell us that Christ as head of the Church is also the bridegroom, and the Church itself is the Bride or Body of Christ.

Then, why shouldn't the bride be represented by a member of the Church congregation, so the "bride" would be BOTH a symbolic representation AND physical embodiment of the Church of Christ?

So if the bridegroom could be represented or embodied by just one person, namely, in the persona of Christ as head of the Church, who is to say the bride shouldn't be embodied by another person who is also a member of the Church of Christ?

Do you agree that God has foreordained Christ as head of the Church to create a new earthly dynasty, which is mentioned in Revelation 20:6: "Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years."?

So do you agree that such a dynasty could only be created if the Bride is not simply metaphor to describe the Church of Christ, but the Bride is also a member of the congregation; as the bride and bridegroom must unite to create such an earthly dynasty which will be centred on God?

So do you agree that the new heaven and earth, and the New Jerusalem will be established on such a foundation? (Revelation 21)

Do you agree that the Church of Christ must be embodied by a member of its own congregation, who will be visible representative of the spiritual Church of Christ?

bride_of_christ_hahlbohm_l_keki.jpg

 
Last edited:

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
The Church is referred to in the Bible as the body of Christ, he being the head and we being the members. He said he wants us all to be one and to be one with him, but he didn’t say that we should be otherwise represented in any way. And why would the reality of the members, which is the actual physical embodiment, be represented symbolically as a single person? Where would everyone else be?

Christ is not represented symbolically either as the head of the Church. A priest functioning in persona Christi is not representing Christ; Christ himself is acting through the priest.

And the Church is also referred to as the Bride of Christ, and Christ as the Bridegroom. Again, he is not represented by some other symbol or entity, and the Church, as the Bride of Christ, is still his ecclesia or assembly. A single person can not symbolize the whole Church.

Do you agree that God has foreordained Christ as head of the Church to create a new earthly dynasty, which is mentioned in Revelation 20:6: "Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years."?
There will be no dynasty because a dynasty is a sequence of rulers. Christ is King forever.

So do you agree that such a dynasty could only be created if the Bride is not simply metaphor to describe the Church of Christ, but the Bride is also a member of the congregation; as the bride and bridegroom must unite to create such an earthly dynasty which will be centred on God?
No.

So do you agree that the new heaven and earth, and the New Jerusalem will be established on such a foundation? (Revelation 21)
No.

Do you agree that the Church of Christ must be embodied by a member of its own congregation, who will be visible representative of the spiritual Church of Christ?
No.
 

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
Then, why shouldn't the bride be represented by a member of the Church congregation, so the "bride" would be BOTH a symbolic representation AND physical embodiment of the Church of Christ?


1 Cor 15:50 But I tell you this, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit God’s Kingdom


 
Top