MD
qualiaphile
Not to derail this thread but in Orthodox Christianity, hell is seen as Separation from God rather than a lake of fire etc.
If God is omnipotent and created everything, then how can one be separate from God?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not to derail this thread but in Orthodox Christianity, hell is seen as Separation from God rather than a lake of fire etc.
So I'm getting the feeling that modern Zoroastrianism is strongly monotheistic and sees that as the original view, whereas what little we know about it under the Achaemenids, Arsacids, and Sassanids suggests it was not, at least in terms of practice. Is it the current view that the understanding of the religion in historical antiquity was imperfect and syncretic with traditional Iranian and other religious forms, or was it simply an alternative but valid way of approaching the teachings? Is worship of a being that is considered to be an aspect of the One God acceptable and still regarded as an expression of monotheism? Or should all reverence be reserved for Ahura Mazda under that name alone?
From an Orthodox Christian websiteIf God is omnipotent and created everything, then how can one be separate from God?
No we are not seperate from God. God is omnipotent. Even though I said "hell is separation from God" that is only a handy metaphor.But aren't we separated from God via sin right now? Doesn't that mean that our current existence is technically Hell?