• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Maybe god did not consciously create the universe, but logic did.

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
The laws of logic, an obsession of mine as many here know. They've fascinated me for years because of their undefeatable, well, logic. One cannot deny that A is A without being bound to the fact that A is A. It's impossible. But strangely I've always viewed this as the best evidence for god.

In a way, the laws of logic are like a prison, without them there would be no division between any one thing. No you or I, us or them. Many times I've thought that this simply did not seem right. They aren't a physical force, they're ideological in nature.

Anyways, I could rant a while but let's skip it. When I think of the original "god" I think 'all knowing, all powerful, timeless, insepratable, etc.'. Through my studies I've seen this is a common idea. But when logic is added to the equation, there must be separate things. God being all knowing means that he cannot be ignorant. God being timeless means he can't be temporal. This creates a contradiction, and to correct that contradiction we got a universe split between spiritual and physical.

Just a thought.
 

Avi1001

reform Jew humanist liberal feminist entrepreneur
The laws of logic, an obsession of mine as many here know. They've fascinated me for years because of their undefeatable, well, logic. One cannot deny that A is A without being bound to the fact that A is A. It's impossible. But strangely I've always viewed this as the best evidence for god.

In a way, the laws of logic are like a prison, without them there would be no division between any one thing. No you or I, us or them. Many times I've thought that this simply did not seem right. They aren't a physical force, they're ideological in nature.

Anyways, I could rant a while but let's skip it. When I think of the original "god" I think 'all knowing, all powerful, timeless, insepratable, etc.'. Through my studies I've seen this is a common idea. But when logic is added to the equation, there must be separate things. God being all knowing means that he cannot be ignorant. God being timeless means he can't be temporal. This creates a contradiction, and to correct that contradiction we got a universe split between spiritual and physical.

Just a thought.
Sounds more reasonable than G-d creating the universe.....but do you think, maybe, it has something to do with mass and energy....???....;)
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
But when logic is added to the equation, there must be separate things

I tend to be cautious on ideas like this. Logic is a creation of the human mind which appears to describe some aspects of experience and the natural world, but assuming it applies to the universe as whole, or to God, seems like a stretch.
 

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
Sounds more reasonable than G-d creating the universe.....but do you think, maybe, it has something to do with mass and energy....???....;)

Mass / energy are physical.

I tend to be cautious on ideas like this. Logic is a creation of the human mind which appears to describe some aspects of experience and the natural world, but assuming it applies to the universe as whole, or to God, seems like a stretch.

This is like your thing with numbers I think. Logic isn't something "made up", it's something observed and then described.
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
Logic isn't something "made up", it's something observed and then described.

But, like number, logic is a creation of the human mind. I think we need to be cautious about projecting human concepts out onto the universe, or giving them some undeserved ontological status based on wishful thinking.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Not claiming I do. I'm saying that Psychoslice's comment is contradictory.


How does the universe create itself before it exists?
The universe has always existed, there is no beginning or end, you will never get your little brain around that.
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
The universe has always existed, there is no beginning or end, you will never get your little brain around that.
Then it can't be created, since to be created means it must be contingent on a creator. Your grasp of elementary English is suspect.

On to your new claim, the universe is a non-contingent and therefore necessary, how do you square that with modern cosmology that indicates a definite beginning of the universe?

Also, no need for insults. Especially when we're all in a glass house.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Then it can't be created, since to be created means it must be contingent on a creator. Your grasp of elementary English is suspect.

On to your new claim, the universe is a non-contingent and therefore necessary, how do you scare that with modern cosmology that indicates a definite beginning of the universe?

Also, no need for insults. Especially when we're all in a glass house.
Excuse me bud, but I never insulted you, that's how you interpreted it, stop feeling sorry for yourself, and see the writing on the wall.
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
Excuse me bud, but I never insulted you, that's how you interpreted it, stop feeling sorry for yourself, and see the writing on the wall.
The universe has always existed, there is no beginning or end, you will never get your little brain around that.

Also, what writing on the wall? You're not making sense.

My real question to you is what makes you so certain about any of your apparent 'facts' here? All you have made are baseless assertions.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
The universe has always existed, there is no beginning or end, you will never get your little brain around that.

Also, what writing on the wall? You're not making sense.

My real question to you is what makes you so certain about any of your apparent 'facts' here?
My truth is from within, its my own experience, not someone else's second hand knowledge, so I say to you, find your own inner truth.
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
.... modern cosmology that indicates a definite beginning of the universe?

Sure, it indicates a beginning to this universe, but cosmologists are now exploring various theories, for example our universe being the latest in a series, or one of many.
It's worth observing here that the principle of cause and effect is a feature of space-time, and space-time is a product of the big bang, so we can't assume the principle of cause and effect "prior" to the big bang. We really don't have the language to describe it.
 
Top