Bishka
Veteran Member
FFH said:Christ had to be ALL things to ALL people. If he was married then he would not be able to relate to, or suffer the shame of, not being married. Have you ever taken notice of those in your ward or neighborhood that never married, because nobody wanted to marry them ??? It is an aweful thing to have to endure. I am sure you know of at least one person that has lived a life of shame, because nobody wanted to marry them. They have lived a single life, and have not quite fitted into the community, especially the LDS community, which stresses marriage and family.
This is what I am talking about, when I say that Christ had to be ALL things to ALL people. He had to be able to relate to ALL people, whoever they might be. If he had married then the unmarried person would not relate to him. He had to decrease so that we might increase. He had to submit to the will of the father, which meant focusing on his ministry. Just think of it in terms of an LDS missionary going on his mission. He is required to postpone marriage until he has finished his mission. Christ was required to do the same thing, postpone marriage until he had finished his mission here on earth.
If Christ had married, he would not have been able to relate to ALL people, especially to the millions of people who will suffer the shame of not marrying in this life.
Actually He could. Then what about all those who suffer heartbreak within a marriage? With what you are saying you are excluding that Christ didn't suffer for those in a bad marriage because He couldn't have because He wasn't married. Anywho, I want this to get back on topic.