• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Obama Iran nuclear plan is working

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
After rereading your post I now admit that I was wrong it my assumption that you were referring to President Bush vice Saddam Hussein. However, let me ask a complex question and get your response. You call Saddam a deranged leader. Now if he, Saddam, could obtain WMD in addition to his chemical weapons do you think that he would attempt to do so knowing his objectives in that area of the world? Now, we are almost 100% positive that he did not have nuclear weapons or the infrastructure to obtain them in the near future . However, if he did have the capability of acquiring them would it not have been to the worlds advantage to remove this possibility? Hindsight is almost 100% right, so we blame President Bush and the American Congress for attacking Iraq due to hindsight and the wrong reason.
Realistically, any "rogue" leader or determined terrorist group can acquire nuclear weapons. If anything, we should bring hellfire and brimstone down upon those who are not uptight pricks about securely storing nuclear material. Rather than focus on those who may-or-may-not have nuclear weapons, we should focus on MUF and demand the security of any place that handles nuclear material make robbing Vegas or Fort Knox seem like robbing an old defenseless granny. But we hear about Saddam, Iraq, and North Korea, but very little is every said about MUF, which is where the real potential nuclear threat lies.
 

factseeker88

factseeker88
Realistically, any "rogue" leader or determined terrorist group can acquire nuclear weapons.

Probably, but they wouldn't know what to do with it. They would need instruction from Russia, France, US, Germany to show them what to do.

:yes::yes::yes:

“[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]No lesson is so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]never trust experts.”[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Lord Salisbury[/FONT][/FONT]


[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]"[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Question everything."[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] TV Science channel [/FONT]
 

Thesavorofpan

Is not going to save you.
Oh..... you're up for a third World War ey?

I assume of course that you'd sign-up for the front lines ASAP if such a war was to break out?

Well thats what would happen if we invaded North Korea, China would get involved and so on.

No I wouldn't sign up, I would probably be drafted.
 

factseeker88

factseeker88
We could all use another world war.

Yeah, sure, wars are entertaining as long as you can watch from the side lines. Here's a song for all you war lovers out there:

"Jingo bells, "jingo bells, Jingo all the way. Oh what fun it is to read our death rolls every day..."

:sorry1::sorry1::sorry1:

“[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]No lesson is so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]never trust experts.”[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Lord Salisbury[/FONT][/FONT]


[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]"[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Question everything."[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] TV Science channel [/FONT]
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
No, because I don't want to kill another human being.

So you don't want to fight, because you don't want to kill another Human - that's fine, however:

We could all use another world war. Although technically speaking we are still at war with North Korea.

I'm not sure I understand this discrepancy: were you being sarcastic about wanting another World War..... or are you a Chickenhawk?
 

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
Oh..... you're up for a third World War ey?

I assume of course that you'd sign-up for the front lines ASAP if such a war was to break out?

America would lose a third world war. China would defeat you in the first week.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Hey, better learn Chinese because they'll be able to invade us soon as the North American continent is drifting towards Asia at the breakneck speed of 2 inches per year. Brace yourself for that collision!
 

factseeker88

factseeker88
Hey, better learn Chinese because they'll be able to invade us soon as the North American continent is drifting towards Asia at the breakneck speed of 2 inches per year. Brace yourself for that collision!

The threat of a shooting war between super powers is over. Now, it's all about politics and sanctions.

:yes::yes::yes:

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. Mark Twain[/FONT]


“[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is WHAT WE DO.” John Ruskin (1819 - 1900) [/FONT]
 

factseeker88

factseeker88
America would lose a third world war. China would defeat you in the first week.

That's what we said after Pearl Harbor in 1941, and the war lasted four more years.

:yes::yes::yes:

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. Mark Twain[/FONT]


“[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is WHAT WE DO.” John Ruskin (1819 - 1900) [/FONT]
 

esmith

Veteran Member
The threat of a shooting war between super powers is over. Now, it's all about politics and sanctions.

:yes::yes::yes:

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. Mark Twain[/FONT]


“[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is WHAT WE DO.” John Ruskin (1819 - 1900) [/FONT]

Maybe you should explain that to the Chinese military.

Here Is The Chinese Fighter Jet That Harassed A U.S. Surveillance Plane
 
Top