-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How Would You Reform Islam?
- Thread starter Sunstone
- Start date
psychoslice
Veteran Member
I think it all comes down to this excerpt from your previous post, Stephen:
God is in and of itself a concept that depends very much on culture, and that has painfully limited the ability of Islam to reform itself, much to the frustration of so many well-meaning people both involved and uninvolved with Muslim practice.
It is in my sincere opinion a grave and very destructive mistake to attempt to make submission to God a main tenet of any religion. And Islam takes it to such a extreme that I can only dread the results even while I sincerely admire the intent of so many who engage in it.
Naming the Sacred "God" is a self-inflicted hardship for any faith. And also, in my sincere opinion, a fatal, even inexcusable flaw. Particularly when the issue of submission to His will is raised (which is the self-declared central point of Islam), it just makes the religious responsibility of people too external to actually work.
Last edited:
Why not?
How long do you think it might take to achieve those goals?
sandandfoam
Veteran Member
I disagree. There seem to me to be as many understandings of God as there are people. On the surface there is much disunity. However, I think that when we go deeper into the experience of God (AKA Buddha nature/inner light etc) we find unity. I believe that there is something of the infinite in all of us. I understand this as God. I accept that others interpret this differently and that some (many?) deny it. I believe it unites us.
Submission is, to my mind, no different than living in accordance with ones Buddha nature or being true to what one is.
That is a scathing judgement. If I claim that such naming works for me why would you presume to judge me so harshly? Is that not a manifestation of the type of intolerance that liberals should rail against?
How would you reconcile that perception with the plain fact that atheism is disapproved of, sometimes quite harmfully, by many people?
You are wise enough to know better than to see submission as an excuse for disrespecting people. So many are not.
Yes, it is.
You? Nah, you are one of the most religiously wise people I ever met. I can testify that it does, indeed, work for you.
That does make it that much more frustrating that you don't see how dangerous that belief can be to others, though.
No, actually it is the insistence of rejecting intolerance.
Picturing the source of the Sacred as an actual sentient will, giving it a name and expecting it to manifest through external authorities that must be submitted to - be those authorities a select few people or scriptures - is simply not conductive to religious health. It is branding people as not being capable of actual religious responsibility, and therefore encouraging them to not even try.
Why not?
sandandfoam
Veteran Member
I believe that intolerance arises from uncertainty. I think that people sometimes see in others that which they dislike in themselves and that this leads to negative attitudes towards others.
What I fear or hate is a reflection of things inside myself. That's how I see it anyway.
I think your point illustrates that submission is not the problem - attitudes to others are.
Which is maybe why it is considered a sin in Islam to associate any deity of personality with God
That is basically my own point, Stephen.
Submission to an external authority for supposed religious and moral truths far too often leads to not feeling truly responsible for one's own moral directives and to simply take it for granted that disbelievers are in the wrong.
As for God having no personality, I don't think that works very well either. Muslims generally do not seem to hesitate in thinking of God as having a clear personality and very specific demands. Which would be ok if they did not also often simply accept those without much questioning.
Submission to an external authority for supposed religious and moral truths far too often leads to not feeling truly responsible for one's own moral directives and to simply take it for granted that disbelievers are in the wrong.
As for God having no personality, I don't think that works very well either. Muslims generally do not seem to hesitate in thinking of God as having a clear personality and very specific demands. Which would be ok if they did not also often simply accept those without much questioning.
sandandfoam
Veteran Member
I'm sure we'll still find plenty to debate
It is my belief that the purpose of submission is to dissolve the barrier between internal and external.
I am pretty sure that any one who made such a claim would be misrepresenting Islam.
See here for example: What is the concept of God in islam? | Islam For Your Information
Assad91
Shi'ah Ali
I'll just say, I'mnot holding my breath.
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
It is complicated, Phil, but this is part of the reason why it cannot change in any meaningful way.
How can you change something that is already perfect? Reforming Islam would usually mean going back to the Islam of the original companions of Muhammad. By default, that would make it far more strict and conservative by our standards.The "Noble" Qur'an - Surat Al-Mā'idah (The Table Spread) 5:3 said:
That said, we may see a new sect emerge in Islam that attempts to embrace modernity. Ultimately that new sect would be bitterly resented and persecuted by the major sects (Sunni and Shia) as not being "true" Muslims for daring to change long standing beliefs and traditions. In any event, the "reform" would not go well and many people would be persecuted and killed.
Here is a partial explanation of the above passage...
Quran Tafsir Ibn Kathir - Islam Has Been Perfected For Muslims
Last edited:
Islam better be reformed or we're all in for - literally - a world of hurt.
Change will come from within. I think the best way to encourage this change is to teach Muslim women - around the world - critical thinking skills. Such education can come in small pieces. For example, if a person learns what a false dilemma argument is, that knowledge is both directly useful, AND it opens up a window to more learning.
_____________
defend net neutrality - "without love in the game, insanity's king"
Change will come from within. I think the best way to encourage this change is to teach Muslim women - around the world - critical thinking skills. Such education can come in small pieces. For example, if a person learns what a false dilemma argument is, that knowledge is both directly useful, AND it opens up a window to more learning.
_____________
defend net neutrality - "without love in the game, insanity's king"
sandandfoam
Veteran Member
Why do you presume that Muslim women are lacking critical thinking skills?
To do so seems both chauvinistic and bigoted.
I might well come to agree. But how much of a practical difference does it make?
It truly seems that it is so hard to see one not misrepresenting Islam that to this day one would be hard pressed to even find consensus of a single example of existing Islamic country.
Ingledsva
HEATHEN ALASKAN
WHY?
Anyone - male or female - that has a one religion society, and only religious education - is going to have problems with critical thinking skills.
They are for all practical purposes - brain washed.
Can they break this? Yes, especially now with the internet allowing access to "other" ideas.
We see differences today in modern Muslim women that attend secular schools, especially in secular countries.
*
What Ingledsva said, plus, it was meant to be just the opposite. Most Muslims live in impoverished, undereducated countries. In general, a great way to help such populations bootstrap themselves is to give the women education. Given a decent education, women do a far better job than men in elevating a society.
sandandfoam
Veteran Member
You're describing Ireland. I imagine many other countries too. I think you're wrong. Of course it could be I lack critical thinking skills....