• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should students be allowed to wear "satanic" symbols to school?

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Offensive or not, there is no legitimate reason why any religious symbol should be overtly displayed by anyone in a public school setting.

I can think of two legitimate reasons pretty easily:

1) Freedom of speech
2) Freedom of religion

And also:

3) What constitutes a "religious symbol" is highly up for interpretation and would realistically be impossible to actually regulate.
 

CynthiaCypher

Well-Known Member
I can think of two legitimate reasons pretty easily:

1) Freedom of speech
2) Freedom of religion

And also:

3) What constitutes a "religious symbol" is highly up for interpretation and would realistically be impossible to actually regulate.

A school as a right to regulate the dress code of the student body. I am not saying they don't have a right to wear a religious symbol, I am saying that a school has a right to limit any overt displays of religious symbols. As long as it is worn discreetly I see no problem.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
If it has to do with dress codes, than "religious symbols" shouldn't be targeted at all. It should be a blanket policy that prohibits wearing jewelry or some such.

The irony is, I don't particularly care considering my religious symbols would never be called out as such. This means I could freely display my religious symbols, but all the mainstream religions can't. Apparently being a religious minority has benefits on occasion.
 

IHaveTheGift

U know who U R
Offensive or not, there is no legitimate reason why any religious symbol should be overtly displayed by anyone in a public school setting. I don't care if it is a cross, Star of David or a pentagram. If you want to put your religion up for public display, do so were it is appropriate.

Emotional pleas do nothing for your argument.
You have no stance to tell anyone what they can and can not wear and where they can or can not wear it.
Sorry about that, become ruler of the world and then, maybe.
Until then...
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
Public school is a place for learning not religion. If a student or teacher wishes to wear a religious symbol they should do so discreetly so as not to disrupt or offend others.

My point is that a cross or whatever worn around the neck isn't going to distract anyone.
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
If it has to do with dress codes, than "religious symbols" shouldn't be targeted at all. It should be a blanket policy that prohibits wearing jewelry or some such.

The irony is, I don't particularly care considering my religious symbols would never be called out as such. This means I could freely display my religious symbols, but all the mainstream religions can't. Apparently being a religious minority has benefits on occasion.

That would be a good solution. Then, that way, no one feels singled out.
 

Assad91

Shi'ah Ali
Do you think this applies to muslimahs wearing hijab?

Is a cross necklace, or any of the symbols being spoken about obligations?

As for things mandatory, id say deserve some lax but not total. Hijabs should be kept to minimal, no niqab, and must meet other proper dress codes. Same for kippahs and the headress sikhs wear
 

CynthiaCypher

Well-Known Member
Is a cross necklace, or any of the symbols being spoken about obligations?

As for things mandatory, id say deserve some lax but not total. Hijabs should be kept to minimal, no niqab, and must meet other proper dress codes. Same for kippahs and the headress sikhs wear

I agree with you 100%
 

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
Is a cross necklace, or any of the symbols being spoken about obligations?

As for things mandatory, id say deserve some lax but not total. Hijabs should be kept to minimal, no niqab, and must meet other proper dress codes. Same for kippahs and the headress sikhs wear

And if we are talking about an individualized path that considers showing the symbol mandatory?
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
Define "Satanic symbol?"

Some examples of Satanic jewelry:

m_YsYz7B0ZXPO8aL_2kIbrg.jpg

$%28KGrHqV,!l8E5hkrK,VKBOg%29L5uNPg~~60_12.JPG

il_340x270.388975193_c2ri.jpg

$_35.JPG
 

IHaveTheGift

U know who U R
Some examples of Satanic jewelry:

m_YsYz7B0ZXPO8aL_2kIbrg.jpg

$%28KGrHqV,!l8E5hkrK,VKBOg%29L5uNPg~~60_12.JPG

il_340x270.388975193_c2ri.jpg

$_35.JPG

The only one I have issues with is the one with words on it.
It's not as if Lucifer for example, is commonly known for its "goodness"
Even if you feel different,
If and when it becomes well known as what it really represents to you, then that changes everything.
right?
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
The only one I have issues with is the one with words on it.
It's not as if Lucifer for example, is commonly known for its "goodness"
Even if you feel different,
If and when it becomes well known as what it really represents to you, then that changes everything.
right?

I think it came from a version of the Black Mass. I think it roughly translates to "In the Name of our God, Satan, Glory to Lucifer" (or Lucifer in the Highest or Lucifer Glorified/Exhalted, etc). The Latin isn't very good. I have that necklace, actually.

This is the one I'm wearing now, though:
62a92c_36bd3a8d5f3a4ef5bb3bc04dd60e9a24.jpg_srz_244_244_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_jpg_srz
 
Last edited:
Top