Thank you very much for the answers, you seem really worked on the questions, But all I see from your answer is that Jesus is just a man. Most of them is based on some dogmatic beliefs. You don't really seem to have thought open minded. That is why the answers are not really satisfactory, though some of them are enough till some point. For example I cannot see a reason to belive that he was sent to atone our sins. Limited punishment for unlimited sin!!!! And what will be than? if you believe in this, you will need more prophets to atone the sins of later generations. This is nonsense. I agree that Jesus was sent to show how to be close to God, but by applying Old Testament, we know that he was a pure Jew. Anyway.
"There are many other problems with the Christian understanding of Jesus, his nature and his relationship with God. From further critical and analytical study of Christian doctrine, what emerges is that there is a Son of God, who possesses the characteristics of a perfect man and also that of a perfect god. However, remember that even according to the Christian doctrine the Father is not exactly like the Son. The Father God, is a perfect God and not a perfect man, while the Son is both a perfect man and a perfect god. In that case these are two separate personalities with different characteristics.
It should be realised that these characteristics are not transferable. There are characters in certain substances which are transferable. For instance, water can become snow and also vapour, without causing a change in the substance or composition of water. But the sort of differences in the characteristics of God and Christ, where certain characteristics are added to one of them, are irreconcilable. It is not possible for one of them to go through this transformation and still remain indistinguishable from the other. That, again, is a problem and a serious one for that matter, whether Jesus Christ was a perfect god as well as a perfect man. If he was, then he was surely different from the Father who was never a perfect man; not even an imperfect one. What type of relationship was this? Was the Son greater than the Father? If this additional character did not make the Son greater then it must have been a defect. In that case a defective Son God is not only against the claims of Christianity, but is also against the universal understanding of God. How, therefore, could anyone comprehend the paradoxical tenet of Christianity which would have us believe that One in Three and Three in One are the same thing, with no difference at all. This can only happen when the very foundation of a belief is raised, not on a factual base, but merely on myth.
Yet another problem to be resolved is this: If Jesus became the Son of God as a consequence of his birth from Marys womb, then what was his position before that? If he was eternally the Son, without having been born of Mary, why was it necessary to give birth to him in a human form? If it was necessary, then the quality of Son was not eternal; it only became an added characteristic after he was given birth and it disappeared when he rejected the body and returned to heaven. So there are many complexities rising out of a belief which common sense rejects. I invite you again to accept a far more respectable and realistic scenario; that of believing the birth of Jesus Christ to be a special creation brought about by God, having activated some hidden laws of nature. Jesus was the metaphorical son of God, loved by Him in a special way; but a human being all the same. His Son status was attached to his character some three hundred years later, to allow his legend to live on."
Regards.