Orias
Left Hand Path
Ok, so if we don't know something then how can we describe it?
And describing things you know around this object you don't know doesn't count!
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Would talking more about what we don't know be more useful than talking about what we supposedly do?
- Thread starter dust1n
- Start date
Ok, so if we don't know something then how can we describe it?
And describing things you know around this object you don't know doesn't count!
He's merely talking about "integrating" his manhood into the world's womenfolk, once again. I've no doubt of it.
Ozzie
Well-Known Member
I add, understanding anything forcibly involves other people.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
In this case, it means talking about both what we know and what we don't know is more useful than only talking about either.
dust1n
Zindīq
Ok, so if we don't know something then how can we describe it?
And describing things you know around this object you don't know doesn't count!
Hm? We wouldn't describe something we don't. We describe what knowledge we lack about some unknown.
dust1n
Zindīq
I would agree with that, but I have yet to encounter someone who talks too much about what they don't know, and the too little about what they supposedly do know.
Orias
Left Hand Path
Ok, but then would we really be without knowledge of whatever we are talking about?
(concerning your last sentence)