Searcher of Light
Member
Everyone knows that Jesus only allowed divorce under adultery. However, in 1 Corinthians 7 Paul talks about one other allowance.
10 Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. 11 But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife.
12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her.
13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him.
14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy.
15 But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace.
16 For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?
These verses discuss how a spouse can lead an unbelieving wife or husband to God. They also allow for divorce should they part because of religion incompatiblity. Notice in verse 15 Paul states that a brother or sister is not under bondage (the wedding vows) should their nonChristian spouse leaves them. While this is Paul's opinion, most Christians do believe he was inspired. These verses allow for divorce in other areas such as abuse. If a wife/husband abuses their spouse they are not Christian no matter what they call themselves. Therefore, under these verses such a divorce would be right in the eyes of God. In a way, it does turn into adultery. Adultery is the mental or physical cheating on a spouse. Abuse and other like actions is cheating on a spouse by demeaning who they are. Also, the unbeliever is commiting adultery against God as the OT and NT throughout explains.
What do you think about this intrepretation?
10 Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. 11 But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife.
12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her.
13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him.
14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy.
15 But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace.
16 For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?
These verses discuss how a spouse can lead an unbelieving wife or husband to God. They also allow for divorce should they part because of religion incompatiblity. Notice in verse 15 Paul states that a brother or sister is not under bondage (the wedding vows) should their nonChristian spouse leaves them. While this is Paul's opinion, most Christians do believe he was inspired. These verses allow for divorce in other areas such as abuse. If a wife/husband abuses their spouse they are not Christian no matter what they call themselves. Therefore, under these verses such a divorce would be right in the eyes of God. In a way, it does turn into adultery. Adultery is the mental or physical cheating on a spouse. Abuse and other like actions is cheating on a spouse by demeaning who they are. Also, the unbeliever is commiting adultery against God as the OT and NT throughout explains.
What do you think about this intrepretation?