• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pope Francis On Gays: 'Who Am I To Judge? We Are Brothers'

Freedomelf

Active Member
For some time already this has been the catholic stance.

How many times do christians have to say they condemn sin and not the sinner?

Sure, I am not saying many do not say this but feel otherwise, but as for the official stance, that has been it for long.

I dont know what is the controversy or surprise here.


Pope Benedict was anti-gay. He wasn't pope that long ago.
 

InformedIgnorance

Do you 'know' or believe?
Because most religious institutions seem to be inclined towards judging people, they seem to think that maybe their god(s) or whatever the system of justice present in their beliefs IS (such as karma etc) that it simply does not work fast enough or obviously enough to appease their own sensibilities - so they decide to take upon themselves the right to judge people in this world.
 

dyanaprajna2011

Dharmapala
Popes disturb me. Even the best of them. I see no good reason for authority in spiritual matters.

Personally, I don't either. But considering the fact that the Catholic church is always going to have a pope, the current one seems to be quite an improvement over many others.

Me Myself said:
For some time already this has been the catholic stance.

How many times do christians have to say they condemn sin and not the sinner?

Sure, I am not saying many do not say this but feel otherwise, but as for the official stance, that has been it for long.

I dont know what is the controversy or surprise here.

Most conservative Christians don't feel that way. They believe that the sinner is just as evil as the sin, especially when it comes to homosexuality.

While you're right, that this has been the teaching of the Catholic church, Francis is the first to publicly state so, in so bold of terms. But it's more than that: it was either JPII or Benedict that decreed that open homosexuals, even if they weren't practicing, could not be priests, while Francis has stated the opposite. Even if you were a "non-practicing" homosexual in the Catholic church, if you stated so, you were still ostracized. Francis is trying to change that.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Any time people state in clear terms that it is pointless to discriminate against people just because they are gay is a fine time in my book.
 

Galen.Iksnudnard

Active Member
I can't help but wonder if this Pope is just trying to pull a PR stunt to improve the image of the Catholic Church.

I'm sure that everyone reading this is already familiar with the Catholic Church's historical anti-LGBTQI stances, so I'll cut to the chase. Christianity by its vary nature has usually ben quite disparaging and arrogant on anything with which the disagreed. The attitude towards individuals who are members of the LGBTQI community are one example of this. For centuries the Catholics have gone around maliciously defaming and damagingly misrepresenting anyone who disagreed with them.

I, for one, am convinced that these recent "changes" are a strong effort on its part to pull the levers of charlatanism to gain more support from people who are smart enough to get out of the Church. This effort is disguised and cloaked in deceit, of course as such efforts always are.

Change doesn't happen overnight. Heck, it took 350 years for the Church to officially adopt the Heliocentric theory and pardon Galileo, as the rest of the world moved forward.
 

Straw Dog

Well-Known Member
Lately, my Catholic friends have been talking up the notion of tolerance in their church. It must be a part of their new ad campaign. I just hope that the new pope doesn't get crucified and that they continue this trend of leaving me the **** alone.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Personally, I don't either. But considering the fact that the Catholic church is always going to have a pope, the current one seems to be quite an improvement over many others.



Most conservative Christians don't feel that way. They believe that the sinner is just as evil as the sin, especially when it comes to homosexuality.

While you're right, that this has been the teaching of the Catholic church, Francis is the first to publicly state so, in so bold of terms. But it's more than that: it was either JPII or Benedict that decreed that open homosexuals, even if they weren't practicing, could not be priests, while Francis has stated the opposite. Even if you were a "non-practicing" homosexual in the Catholic church, if you stated so, you were still ostracized. Francis is trying to change that.

The priest thing is weirdet than against homosexuals. It was justified as you needing to "give up" something by becoming priest. Because homosexuals wouldnt be "giving up" their opportunity for sex (their prefered sex was always sinful, whereas an heterosexual could have had married and had non sinjful sex).

Likewise, people without hands couldnt (and cant I assume) be priests because they dont havehands to make the eucharisty. I would assume asexuals shouldnt be able to be priests by the same regard.
 

Straw Dog

Well-Known Member
I'm sure glad that I can masturbate and make love to whomever I please without having to reference some arbitrary moral code. It must be such a turn-off having to concur with some stupid ******* rulebook.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Why is the Pope on gays is the first place, let alone his brothers.

Things are freaky in the Vatican.
 

Vouthon

Dominus Deus tuus ignis consumens est
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm sure glad that I can masturbate and make love to whomever I please without having to reference some arbitrary moral code. It must be such a turn-off having to concur with some stupid ******* rulebook.


Actually, most religions do not function as all-encompassing rule-books that infringe on independent investigation of truth and liberty, with the exception of the most fundamentalist interpretations of them. Catholicism, for one, places great emphasis upon conscience and adhering to one's conscience. Revealed truth serves as a guide and enlightener to conscience rather than its ruler, as one of our Blesseds said:

"...Certainly, if I am obliged to bring religion into after dinner toasts, I shall drink to the Pope, if you please- still to Conscience first, and to the pope afterwards...I wish for the intellect to range with the utmost freedom, and religion to enjoy an equal freedom..."

- Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman, (1801 –1890) from his letter to the Duke of Norfolk quoted by Pope Benedict XVI in, "Conscience and Truth"


Even former Pope Benedict XVI once conceded:

"...Over the pope as the expression of the binding claim of ecclesiastical authority there still stands one's own conscience, which must be obeyed before all else, if necessary even against the requirement of ecclesiastical authority. The conscience of the individual confronts him with a supreme and ultimate tribunal which in the last resort is beyond the claim of external social groups, even of the official church. In all activity man is bound to follow his conscience… It follows he is not to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his conscience. Nor…to be restrained from acting in accordance with his conscience, especially in matters religious...”

- Pope Benedict XVI, Commentary on the Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, in vol.5

Btw are you "angry" today? You seem to be swearing a lot on various threads :D
 
Last edited:

Vouthon

Dominus Deus tuus ignis consumens est
Staff member
Premium Member
Why is the Pope on gays is the first place, let alone his brothers.

Do you mean why did he discuss the topic at all?

If so, simply because he was asked a question by a reporter about a priest who had reportedly had a gay lover in the past:

The biggest headline came in Francis' inflight news conference on the way home from Brazil this week, when he was asked about a trusted monsignor who reportedly once had a gay lover.

"Who am I to judge?" he asked, when it comes to the sexual orientation of priests, as long as they are searching for God and have good will

Pope Francis Reforms Threaten Some Catholics, Changes Not Welcomed By All
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Do you mean why did he discuss the topic at all?

If so, simply because he was asked a question by a reporter about a priest who had reportedly had a gay lover in the past:

Lol, no. I said a spot for a bad joke because when I read the headline, "Pope Francis On Gays: 'Who Am I To Judge? We Are Brothers'" I took on a little too seriously.


I guess that is to be expected; but I find it strange... isn't the Pope, like, infallible?
 

Straw Dog

Well-Known Member
Actually, most religions do not function as all-encompassing rule-books that infringe on independent investigation of truth and liberty, with the exception of the most fundamentalist interpretations of them. Catholicism, for one, places great emphasis upon conscience and adhering to one's conscience. Revealed truth serves as a guide and enlightener to conscience rather than its ruler, as one of our Blesseds said:

Oh good, then I don't have to bother seeking justification from external sources.

Btw are you "angry" today? You seem to be swearing a lot on various threads :D

Not particularly. My default personality does tend to swear with some regularity. I'm just trying to be more authentic. Should I go back to pretending according to political correctness?
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
The pope is only considered infallible when speaking ex cathedra in matters to do with faith and morals, and within very defined parameters.

Which is why it isimportant to takeintoconsideration that pope infalibility is a more or less recent invention, which has been further edited even way more recently. (after a lot of popes spoke directly against the concept saying it was a lie from Satan, that is )
 

Vouthon

Dominus Deus tuus ignis consumens est
Staff member
Premium Member
Not particularly. My default personality does tend to swear with some regularity. I'm just trying to be more authentic. Should I go back to pretending according to political correctness?

Of course not. Swear like a trooper for all I care :D Its only that I hadn't noticed you swearing before, so I simply thought it to be "out of character" but clearly I was wrong, so no worries there my friend.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
I'm sure glad that I can masturbate and make love to whomever I please without having to reference some arbitrary moral code. It must be such a turn-off having to concur with some stupid ******* rulebook.

The conversation is about sex, not love.

Catholics should make love with everyone :D but sex only bithin marriage.
 
Top