• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Bible as Evidence

Ceridwen018

Well-Known Member
Can the Bible be used as evidence? Can the things that are written about in the Bible be considered true because the Bible is a legitimate source? That's what I want to find out!

Steve posted the paragraph below in another thread, and to escape going off topic I decided to respond to it here. I have posted his entire paragraph in full so that you can all see it in context, and then I have broken it up to make it easier for me to respond to. Lets get this ball rolling!

Steve said:
I do believe the bible is evidence, its not just one book but many and with many different authors testifying to having seen, spoken and eaten with Christ after the resurection. These same people were also willing to die for what they were proclaiming and obviously with such a claim they knew if what they were saying was a lie or not. I dont believe they would go through the different persecutions and ultimatley the various deaths they went to for somthing they knew was a lie. Then there is the various prophecies regarding Christ eg isiah 53, written 700years bc.
Also the Christian church is evidence in itself that Christ was resurected, eg cause and effect, somthing caused the apostles to proclaim what they did after initially deserting Christ at the cross. Then i could also go into things i have personally seen, eg people being delivered from evil spirits in the name of Jesus etc and also the feeling of Christ's presence sometimes in worship etc.
I do believe the bible is evidence, its not just one book but many and with many different authors testifying to having seen, spoken and eaten with Christ after the resurection.
Actually, to the best of my knowledge, no one has ever claimed that the books of the Bible were really written by people who knew Jesus personally, (if we're talking about the New Testament, of course). They are accounts of other people's interactions with Jesus. In fact, the Gospels are said to have been written as many as 70 to 100 years after Jesus' death--by that time, everyone who knew Jesus personally was dead too. To top it all off, no one can be certain of the actual identities of the NT authors. Historians have different theories, but no one can seem to reach a definite conclusion.

These same people were also willing to die for what they were proclaiming and obviously with such a claim they knew if what they were saying was a lie or not.
History does not agree with you here. There have been many accounts, quite recently even, of people dying for false beliefs. What about that one cult from a few years ago where all of its members drank poisoned coolade because they "believed" the aliens were coming?

Another point, even if there were a handful of people who were convinced about Jesus to the point that they would dedicate their lives to his cause, the vast majority of people from that same area--many of whom also came into contact with Jesus and/or knew him personally--were not convinced: Enter the Jews. The point here is that whoever Jesus was, he was not particularly convincing to the majority of people.

I dont believe they would go through the different persecutions and ultimatley the various deaths they went to for somthing they knew was a lie.
They probably didn't think it was a lie--they probably thought it was true. Unfortunately for them, they were the only ones.

Then there is the various prophecies regarding Christ eg isiah 53, written 700years bc.
I would like everyone to take notice that Steve stops talking about prophecies here. He doesn't offer any specific examples--nothing. Why? Because there are no good examples of fulfilled prophecies in the Bible. The prophecies stated in the Bible are vague at best, and unintelligible at worst.

Also the Christian church is evidence in itself that Christ was resurected, eg cause and effect, somthing caused the apostles to proclaim what they did after initially deserting Christ at the cross.
What caused the members of that cult to commit suicide for their beliefs? Probably the same thing.

Then i could also go into things i have personally seen, eg people being delivered from evil spirits in the name of Jesus etc and also the feeling of Christ's presence sometimes in worship etc.
These are all subjective experiences, Steve. As far as "people being delivered from demons" goes, for all you know, those people could have been conning you. I'm not trying to demean your experiences here, I'm just trying to be realistic.

And with the "feeling of Christ's presence," one must always remember that "feelings" are highly subjective, and are often the result of what our mind expects/thinks/believes. You may feel overwhelming joy not because the Holy Spirit has transcended upon you, but because you think it has or will.

Closing Statement: I would like to point out that there is no evidence outside of the Bible for many of the things that the Bible claims happened. All that Steve and I have been discussing above is pretty much irrelevent until someone can prove that the events in the Bible are actually historical. Unfortunately, there is much evidence suggesting the contrary, and historians even disagree as to whether or not a figure named Jesus ever existed, son of God or no.
 

linwood

Well-Known Member
We discussed this in the Jesus on trial thread not long ago.

The Bible can be used as evidence for history just as the dollar under my daughters pillow can be used as evidence for the Tooth Fairy.

This evidence would not be acceptable to a court of law however as it is heresay.

It all depends on the level of evidence one is willing to accept.

Mines a little too high to take the Bible as evidence for much.
 

Steve

Active Member
Steve said:
These same people were also willing to die for what they were proclaiming and obviously with such a claim they knew if what they were saying was a lie or not.
Ceridwen018 said:
There have been many accounts, quite recently even, of people dying for false beliefs. What about that one cult from a few years ago where all of its members drank poisoned coolade because they "believed" the aliens were coming?
The point here is not wether or not people have or havnt died for false beliefs - its obvious many have, rather the point im making is that because of the nature of their claim eg eating/drinking/speaking with the risen Christ they were instead dying for what they either knew was a lie the group had made up or somthing that knew really happened. It cant be just said that they were mistaken\misugided in their beliefs the nature of their claims dosnt allow it, they were either trying to create some elaborate lie or they really were proclaiming what happened. And considering their deaths it seems absurd that they would die for what they knew was a lie.

Ceridwen018 said:
Another point, even if there were a handful of people who were convinced about Jesus to the point that they would dedicate their lives to his cause, the vast majority of people from that same area--many of whom also came into contact with Jesus and/or knew him personally--were not convinced: Enter the Jews. The point here is that whoever Jesus was, he was not particularly convincing to the majority of people.
Jesus didnt appear to the majority after his resurection, thats perhaps why the majority didnt believe besides what are you trying to say - that because the majority who Jesus didnt appear too didnt believe, that the few who Christ did appear to cant be believed?


Ceridwen018 said:
They probably didn't think it was a lie--they probably thought it was true. Unfortunately for them, they were the only ones.
Well if you think a group of people can believe they ate,drank and spoke on more then one occasion with someone who was crucified and dead for 3 days go ahead. If you honestly believe these people probably thought it was true how do you explain thier claims? as added extras to backup the story their minds had conjured up? Their claims arnt the kind of thing you mistake or are unsure of, they either lied about the experience or it happened. How could a group believe an experience like this really happened to the point of death if instead nothing had happened and Christ was still buried in his tomb?

Steve said:
Then there is the various prophecies regarding Christ eg isiah 53, written 700years bc.
Ceridwen018 said:
I would like everyone to take notice that Steve stops talking about prophecies here. He doesn't offer any specific examples--nothing. Why? Because there are no good examples of fulfilled prophecies in the Bible. The prophecies stated in the Bible are vague at best, and unintelligible at worst.
Your kidding right? have you ever read the prophecy i mentioned?
Surely he took up our infirmities
and carried our sorrows,
yet we considered him stricken by God,
smitten by him, and afflicted.

But he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
and by his wounds we are healed.

We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before her shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth.

By oppression and judgment he was taken away.
And who can speak of his descendants?
For he was cut off from the land of the living;
for the transgression of my people he was stricken.

Isaiah 53: 4-8
And if anyone is actually interested http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/messianicprophecies.html lists more regarding Christ.


Ceridwen018 said:
These are all subjective experiences, Steve. As far as "people being delivered from demons" goes, for all you know, those people could have been conning you. I'm not trying to demean your experiences here, I'm just trying to be realistic.

And with the "feeling of Christ's presence," one must always remember that "feelings" are highly subjective, and are often the result of what our mind expects/thinks/believes. You may feel overwhelming joy not because the Holy Spirit has transcended upon you, but because you think it has or will.
I agree with you to an extent on this comment, your right it is subjective in a way and for people who dont actually know me i certainly understand why one dosnt just believe everything the next person says they saw or felt etc. However the things i have seen and felt do obviously affect my outlook on life (wether or not you believe i did see or feel what i say i did is up to you) and what i believe about the bible etc.
You can say things like perhaps they were conning you, or many others often say to me maybe its a mind thing etc but if you had seen some of these things yourself you too would realise how stupid such explanations sound - i suppose if i were to put myself in your shoes i too may suggest such "explanations", the reality however is that im in my shoes, have seen these things and they are unmistakable (eg some of the people who i have seen delivered are very close either family or friends, to supose they are "putting on a show for me" is absurd especially considering some of the things they would have to fake or act).
When you say "I'm just trying to be realistic" have you ever considered that perhaps what im saying is real?
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Steve said:
Your kidding right? have you ever read the prophecy i mentioned? ... Isaiah 53: 4-8
This is so tiresome. Clearly anyone evolving/fabricating a mesiah would have this and the 22nd Psalm as ready template. One need only study the Qumran material.
 

Deut 13:1

Well-Known Member
Steve said:
Your kidding right? have you ever read the prophecy i mentioned?
Let me know if you ever have the urge to discuss why every English translation by Christians purposely mistranslates NUMEROUS words in Isaiah 53, as well as ignore who Avdi is throughout the entire Isaiah text.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Steve said:
Your kidding right? have you ever read the prophecy i mentioned?... Isaiah 53: 4-8
We have the quotation in Matthew, presumably a Jew interpreting Isaiah, the author's misquote notwithstanding, he is interpreting the passage. This isn't the only place where the NT authors quote the Hebrew Bible and do not follow the text word for word in any of our available sources (the available Hebrew texts or the LXX).

The Source of the Quotation from Isaiah 53:4 in Matthew 8:17. By: Menken, Martinus J J. Source: Novum testamentum, 39 O 1997, p 313-327. Publication Type: Article
Full Text From ATLA: Click here for electronic resource
iconSmartLink.gif
Linked Full Text


Justin Martyr's use of this passage is interesting.

Justin and Isaiah 53 By: Bingham, D Jeffrey Source: Vigiliae christianae, 54 no 3 2000, p 248-261. Publication Type: Article
iconSmartLink.gif
Linked Full Text
 

Ceridwen018

Well-Known Member
Steve said:
The point here is not wether or not people have or havnt died for false beliefs - its obvious many have, rather the point im making is that because of the nature of their claim eg eating/drinking/speaking with the risen Christ they were instead dying for what they either knew was a lie the group had made up or somthing that knew really happened.
There is a third alternative: they could have died over something that they thought really happened, but that actually hadn't happened. Its obviously illogical to think that they would have killed themselves and put up such a fuss over something that they knew was a lie, (then again, there are some weird people out there), so I think we can rule that one out. I think its safe to say that these people died over things that they genuinely believed. So then, were they tricked, or was it all true? Evidence does not seem to suggest that its "all true," thats all I'm saying.

It cant be just said that they were mistaken\misugided in their beliefs the nature of their claims dosnt allow it, they were either trying to create some elaborate lie or they really were proclaiming what happened.
I disagree--I think they could have been tricked. People get tricked every day over even the slightest thing. It doesn't seem so out there to me that a group of religious zealots could have been scouted by someone claiming to be the messiah, especially when those people lived in a time where they felt oppressed, and were hoping desperately for the messiah to come.
Jesus didnt appear to the majority after his resurection, thats perhaps why the majority didnt believe besides what are you trying to say - that because the majority who Jesus didnt appear too didnt believe, that the few who Christ did appear to cant be believed?
If I'm remebering my Bible correctly, many of the people who Jesus appeared to after his resurrection didn't believe he was Jesus because they didn't recognize him. If that's not fishy enough, I find it strangely convenient that "Jesus" only appeared to people with whom he had had close relationships with, and who otherwise would have been the best candidates for fabricating such a story. If Jesus had appeared to a total stranger who had no reason to lie, that would be interesting.

Well if you think a group of people can believe they ate,drank and spoke on more then one occasion with someone who was crucified and dead for 3 days go ahead. If you honestly believe these people probably thought it was true how do you explain thier claims?
How do you explain the people out there who claim that Elvis is not dead? We have irrefutable evidence that Elvis is dead, yet even today there are people who claim to have seen him recently, etc. I'm not being sarcastic here, I'm being dead serious, (no pun intended). Explain the "Elvis Sightings," and I believe you will have answered your own question simultaneously.

Your kidding right? have you ever read the prophecy i mentioned?
The prophecy speaks of a religious heretic who is eventually put to death by his peers because of his heretical beliefs. Of all of the millions of people who have been murdered over the years due to unconventional religious beliefs, I don't understand why you choose to single out this Jesus fellow.

Now, if the prophecy went a little like this, on the other hand--

"In the year 35 b.c. (approx.) a male child named Jesus will be born to Mary and Joseph of Nazareth in the town of Bethlehem, while Mary and Joseph are registering for the census that Caesar has instructed to be conducted...(and so on)"

--we might have an argument. The problem with the prophecy you provided, and with all others in the Bible, is that they are too vague.

When you say "I'm just trying to be realistic" have you ever considered that perhaps what im saying is real?
Yes. In fact, I also used to believe that all of that stuff was real--the feelings, the demons, all of it. Which is why I am so convinced it is not real now that I have been exposed to the "other side," if you will.
 

cardw

Member
If you want to get a good overview of this problem Bart D Ehrman has a great book called, "Misquoting Jesus" where he goes over the difficulty of establishing an official translation.

The major difficulty is that we have a whole lot of early versions of the Bible in Greek that differ from each other. In fact there may be as many as 20 to 30 thousand differences in the texts. Many are minor, but there are a number that are quite significant.

Also the literacy rate among Christians in the early church hardly reached 2 to 5 percent. Until fairly recently, since the invention of the printing press, literacy was doing well if it reached 15 percent of the population.

So the chances that we have an accurate record, (particualary since the primary purpose of the Bible was theological, not historical), is pretty slim.
 
Top