Biblically I don't see support for that position. Naaman bathed seven times to be cured of his leprosy, but he was not worshiping when he did it. Traditionally it was symbolic for sanctification, setting the person aside for fellowship. This was preparation for fellowship, but it did not remove the effects of wicked behavior. John came preaching against the establishment, preaching against the wealthy, and he was preaching against the temple priests or at least the way they were doing things. He was a 'Voice in the wilderness' which means he was preaching Isaiah 40 the bits about "grass withers and flowers fade." James preaches along the same lines in his letter.Sleeppy said:Except baptism is an act of worship, bringing those of guilt toward freedom from guilt and continual sin.
When John baptized it was a baptism into the message that God grants wisdom to anyone who asks. This message did not sit well with many in leadership, and they would not accept his message. They were the builders rejecting the "Stone that the builders rejected which has been made into the capstone." The Pharisees believed strongly in the brand of their sect, which is why John called the Pharisees 'Vipers'. They were not desiring to break commandments at all or do people harm. They were set in their ways and methods and this made them inflexible, ultimately causing them to err.
Last edited: