• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Prophets?

DrM

Member
The word "prophet" comes from two Greek words : "speak" and "for". First, it means: a person who speaks for God or a god. The word also signifies someone who utters divinely inspired revelations. Thirdly, the word applies to someone who foretells future events.

In the Bible, the prophets clearly stated that their messages came from God. The prophets were simply the mouthpieces of the Lord. As Jeremiah wrote, "The Lord put out his hand and touched my mouth and said, 'Now I have put my words in your mouth'." (Jeremiah 1:9)

Unlike Jeremiah, I have not been told what to say about God. I write what my mind tells me is the truth. My reason realizes that the laws and structures in Nature presuppose an Originator - a supremely intelligent and powerful Creator.

From Nature, that is all that I can know about God and that is all that I can tell others about him. For simply saying "God exists", however, noone deserves the prestigious title of "prophet". Perhaps "lowly voice for Nature's God" would be more fitting.

All the prophets on record proclaimed supernatural realities beyond human reason. One of them is God's predilection for the Hebrew race who called themselves God's "Chosen People". Another reputed supernatural revelation is that the first human couple disobeyed God's command not to eat a certain fruit. To expiate that crime and regain God's good graces for all mankind, the Son of God, Jesus, had to die on a cross.

There are hundreds of other supernatural revelations about God reported by prophets but none by Nature. None deserves the fame of being called a prophet.

As regards the last meaning of prophet as someone who predicts the future:
For what will happen in the near or distant future, I do not consult fortune-tellers nor Bible thumpers. I listen to experts who rely upon the facts and realities that Nature reveals.

When I look back in history I see that humans, who lived about five thousand years ago in Egypt and Sumer, believed that deities controlled the forces of nature. So did the Greeks (900-200 B.C.) and the Romans (500 B.C.-300 A.D.) After abandoning the notion of deities, people began to believe in one God. But this belief was not homogeneous. It differed greatly and splintered into a hodgepodge of religious groups.

None can prove the sincerity of their interpretation of specious revelations of God. Not one bases its teachings on realities in Nature. All members rely on the testimony of other humans, who also believe on the say-so of other people down into the distant past. On that record of history, I surmise that, just as humans rejected the idea of many deities, so will they eventually
abandon all the unproven supernatural revelations of God. Like the genius Einstein and so many others, they will rely only on the verified laws of Nature that presuppose a Maker who is supremely intelligent and powerful. God exists. That's all we need to know about God. Enjoy his world.
 

cardero

Citizen Mod
The two detrimental aspects of organized religion are "prophets" and "profits". Usually the first one can lead to the other. Since the future is mutable I do not see how we can even encourage such insights.
 

Betho_br

Member
"Many people find 'God' directly in the natural world and also in science. Yes, false prophets and 'Mammon' are closely connected."
 
Top