Since I don't believe Jesus to be a prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy, then it makes it very difficult for me to answer your questions. I have pointed out repeatedly in this topic that it is Joshua, not Jesus or Muhammad.
a) Like unto moses
1) You are stating the obvious here. I don't see Jesus as this prophecised prophet, so it is irrelevant to Deuteronomy passage. (I understand you are trying to make your point to May. But this point is pointless, because according to the bible, his father is God, so your statement that he had "no father" is inaccurate and misleading, unless you mean mortal father.) I believed that the passages referred to Joshua, Moses' successor, and Joshua has a father and mother.
2) Again, Jesus is not relevant here. Begetting children or not, does not disqualify anyone from becoming a prophet. The prophet Samuel remained single and without children, so your point is sillier than your 1st point.
3) According to the Bible and Christian belief, Jesus was never a prophet, but a Messiah or Christ. Again, I don't think the passage Deuteronomy 18 referred to Jesus. Again, another silly point. Again, I think it was talking about Joshua, whom you keep ignoring. Joshua, who succeeded Moses as leader who had ultimate power, just like a king and judge. He could execute anyone, and was unbeaten in war, when they occupied Canaan.
My 2nd point on this point of yours, is that Moses never claimed to be king. You don't need to be king to lead people. And you forget in an earlier chapter of Deuteronomy (17:14-20), that Moses already given Israelites advice on selecting a king, and he specificially told them not choose any non-Israelite to become king. And if you are silly enough to equate prophethood with kingship, then Moses told them they can't have non-Israelite king, then they also can't have non-Israelite prophet. So your king/prophet theory basically disqualified Muhammad, because he is neither Israelite nor Jew.
4) and 5) A new prophet, not another lawgiver. The Deuteronomy said about new prophet, nothing about introducing a new law, since Moses have given them everything. As I said before "like unto me" probably just mean a leader (and prophet) who would succeed him and bring his people home.
Why would the Israelites need new laws? Another irrelevant point, Yasin.
6) Median? Now you are fibbing. Moses was born and raised in Egypt.
7) Again, you forgot Joshua, which I already mentioned in point 3. Joshua was unbeaten in wars, as he led the invasion into Canaan. 2nd point is that to be a prophet, become a warleader is not a requirement, and it doesn't say in Deuteronomy 18 military requirement is needed.
Last point, is that you have misread the whole Exodus. The Israelites didn't fight the Pharaoh's Egyptian army, because there were no battle. The Israelites fled through the parting of the Red Sea (more accurately, it is the Sea of Reed, KJV has mistranslated the sea).
8, 9, 10) Another pointless point, because Joshua is the foreseen prophet.
11) That's a very stupid point. Age doesn't matter. Do you always make trivial points?
12) Same as points 8, 9, 10.
You seemed to make a habit of pointing out trivial resemblances between Moses and Muhammad. Ok, then let me make some trivials of why there are difference between Moses and Muhammad.
Why didn't Muhammad lead Israelites/Jews out of exile and bring them home?
Why didn't Muhammad part the Red Sea, and destroyed the Egyptians for the Israelites?
Why did Muhammad killed Jews who didn't believe him to be a prophet?
Why didn't Muhammad received the 10 Commandments? Why didn't the make a Ark of Convenant of gold?
Why didn't God showered Muhammad's followers with manna and give them quails to eat?
Do you see my points? You put silly comparisons, but if they are so alike, then why didn't Muhammad also follow Moses' path.
You forget one very important point in the whole story of Moses. Moses had to lead the twelve tribes of Israel out of slavery, but since he died someone had to lead them into Canaan. Did Muhammad do this for the Israelites? No, it was Joshua. Moses only completed one half of God's convenant, which was to return the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob back to Canaan, the land God had promised Abraham and to his son and grandson.
I have already given you my perspective to your points in b) and c), in previous posts, so I am not going to repeat myself again.
But I will make a couple of points.
In b) and c), in no where did Deuteronomy, exclude Israelite, but in no place did it include non-Israelite, thus Ishmaelite.
At point c), at no point, did the Torah mentioned Jews. The books about Moses, from Exodus and Deuteronomy, often referred to the people as Israelites or people who spoke Hebrews.
Jews did not only comes from the religion Judaism, which there were no name for this religion at this time, but we know today, Moses is its founder. Jews also referred to descendants of the tribe of Judah, which was later a southern kingdom, and later still as a Hellenistic and Roman province of Judaea.
Ishmaelites don't not belong to the tribe of Israel (Jacob). And Arab and Hebrew are different languages with their own dialects, although they do belong in the Semitic (language) family.
Yasin, you are reading too much in thing, and ignoring obvious signs. I am afraid that as I read more of your explanations; you will take the whole chapter and book out of context, by reading only couple of specific passages. I am afraid that a typical habit of promoting Muhammad as your prophet, but your argument is weak, and very subjective.