Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I feel the best way to interpret this is through digital physics and brane cosmology, which I garble as follows; God can be conceptualized (rarely a good idea, and always incomplete) as that layer which, though permeating every other 'layer' of reality, reposes beyond their limitations and particular processes & patterns.
The basal layer where everything happens at once, has already happened, and never occurs.
I feel the best way to interpret this is through digital physics and brane cosmology, which I garble as follows; God can be conceptualized (rarely a good idea, and always incomplete) as that layer which, though permeating every other 'layer' of reality, reposes beyond their limitations and particular processes & patterns.
The basal layer where everything happens at once, has already happened, and never occurs.
He knows all that it is possible to know--obviously including things beyond human comprehension.What is meant when it is said that the God is omniscient? I do have a view that I am reserving for discussion after the basic definitions and concepts develop.
I invite everyone to please define the term, preferably illustrated with examples.
Thanks.
What is meant when it is said that the God is omniscient? I do have a view that I am reserving for discussion after the basic definitions and concepts develop.
I invite everyone to please define the term, preferably illustrated with examples.
Thanks.
The Abrahamic deity's level of power and knowledge has the tendency to change with the interpretation of the various writers, and seems to increase over time. For not unrelated reasons, the character of superman had power creep in the comics over time and had to be reigned in once in a while in order to make plausible threats possible.Omniscient means he is 'all-knowing' ....it is in the sense that nothing can be hidden from him
The scriptures describe this omniscience in this way:
Hebrews 4:13 And there is not a creation that is not manifest to his sight, but all things are naked and openly exposed to the eyes of him with whom we have an accounting
Psalm 90:8 You have set our errors right in front of you, Our hidden things before your bright face.
Proverbs 15:11 She′ol and [the place of] destruction are in front of Jehovah. How much more so the hearts of the sons of mankind!
Romans 2:16 This will be in the day when God through Christ Jesus judges the secret things of mankind, according to the good news I declare
Jeremiah 17:10 'I, Jehovah, am searching the heart, examining the kidneys, even to give to each one according to his ways...'
it means every act, our very thoughts/motives & desires are known to God....he knows what you are thinking right now as you read this.
Generally speaking though, I find these kinds of definitions pointless and irrelevant unless they are a way of recognising and abiding in the 'being' who knows.
all knowing , but not through the interlect , but through his omnipresence and omnipotency .What is meant when it is said that the God is omniscient?
I do have a view that I am reserving for discussion after the basic definitions and concepts develop.
I invite everyone to please define the term, preferably illustrated with examples.
Thanks.
What is meant when it is said that the God is omniscient? I do have a view that I am reserving for discussion after the basic definitions and concepts develop.
I invite everyone to please define the term, preferably illustrated with examples.
Thanks.
What is meant when it is said that the God is omniscient? I do have a view that I am reserving for discussion after the basic definitions and concepts develop.
I invite everyone to please define the term, preferably illustrated with examples.
Thanks.
Just to throw in an unconventional perspective...
I do not tend to use the "omni" terms, but in a polytheistic context, I may use them in a relative sense to describe the pervasiveness of a particular deity within my experience of reality. For example, in Greek mythology, Helius is an oracular deity because his position in the cosmos allows him to see and watch significantly more than many other gods. That makes Helius relatively omniscient, particularly with respect to events occurring during the daytime on earth's surface.
However, when I have used that term in a positive way, I use it to refer to the 'being' which is present and foundational in every experience, as opposed to the momentary behaviors of the mind which identify as "I".
So in that sense, 'god' is the experiencer of whatever is experienced, and thus everything 'known' is known by 'god'. Omniscience then means that everything which is 'known' (experienced) is known by the pervasive being.
Generally speaking though, I find these kinds of definitions pointless and irrelevant unless they are a way of recognising and abiding in the 'being' who knows.
To me, omniscience describes a being that knows everything.
Reality to this being (if my imagination serves me well) would seem much more like a solid object. Everything 'happens' at once to this being. If it were to focus on say, a human being. It would watch the egg and the sperm develop in the parents at the same time it witnessed their bones crumble beyond discernment. That would be one static 'object' to this being. If you add all the rest of reality back in (which this being must be able to do) it probably looks like a solid rock. Each piece from start to finish present along with everything else. It also knows exactly why all the pieces look the way they do and all of the other ways they might have looked if things had gone differently (or if they go differently somewhere else, as well).
all knowing , but not through the interlect , but through his omnipresence and omnipotence.
That's lovely; but having a particular understanding of omniscience and none of physics, I am more tempted to interpret brane cosmology through this than the other way around.I feel the best way to interpret this is through digital physics and brane cosmology, which I garble as follows; God can be conceptualized (rarely a good idea, and always incomplete) as that layer which, though permeating every other 'layer' of reality, reposes beyond their limitations and particular processes & patterns.
The basal layer where everything happens at once, has already happened, and never occurs.
That's lovely; but having a particular understanding of omniscience and none of physics, I am more tempted to interpret brane cosmology through this than the other way around.
Thanks for the image of branes. (mmmm, branes)