Trying so hard to wedge all of the peas into the same pod.
Like those who blame Islam itself for the faults of those who happen to be members.
It's something we all do.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trying so hard to wedge all of the peas into the same pod.
As opposed to literally hundreds of examples from all over the world... Nice work.Two theaters showing the movie were bombed.
But, Riverwolf, at the time, it was shown to be the actions of VERY FEW... as opposed to hundreds of thousands... in the here and now.People who were alive back then are still alive now, and not in nursing homes. It wasn't that long ago.
And yet fanatical Islam is growing each day. My guess is that this will not "go away" until sane Muslims seek to curb the actions of their unhinged brethren. We can't do it, that is for sure. Likewise in a few decades there will be new protests as the wingnuts are emboldened.If it was that long ago, then the current Muslim riots will be irrelevant in a few decades, and we may as well just weather it until both sides calm down and find something else to hate.
Quran:And yet fanatical Islam is growing each day. My guess is that this will not "go away" until sane Muslims seek to curb the actions of their unhinged brethren. We can't do it, that is for sure. Likewise in a few decades there will be new protests as the wingnuts are emboldened.
As opposed to literally hundreds of examples from all over the world... Nice work.
But, Riverwolf, at the time, it was shown to be the actions of VERY FEW... as opposed to hundreds of thousands... in the here and now.
It's growing probably because they're sick of being bullied by us.And yet fanatical Islam is growing each day. My guess is that this will not "go away" until sane Muslims seek to curb the actions of their unhinged brethren. We can't do it, that is for sure. Likewise in a few decades there will be new protests as the wingnuts are emboldened.
But, Riverwolf, at the time, it was shown to be the actions of VERY FEW... as opposed to hundreds of thousands... in the here and now.
Hundreds of thousands protesting. Not being violent. And as I pointed out earlier hundreds of thousands of Muslims is less than 1/10 of 1%. I think that could be safely be said to be VERY FEW Muslims even out there protesting.
People keep saying it is just a small amount of Muslims protesting. Even a small amount of people who are intent on causing death and destruction are able to do so.
The issue is the violence that has occurred.
Many people have killed of late for freedom. Many have killed for democracy. Are those who believe in freedom and democracy responsible for those who perpetuate violence in their name?
If an Irishman murders for sectarian reasons am I responsible for his behaviour? If he murders for religion is the reposnsibility on Catholics/Protestants/Christians everywhere?
Violence seems ubiquitous these days. My view is that violence is unacceptable - not Islam/Judaism/Christianity/SIkhism or whatever you're having yourself.
People keep saying it is just a small amount of Muslims protesting. Even a small amount of people who are intent on causing death and destruction are able to do so.
The issue is the violence that has occurred.
I agree. By doing so, you are falling into the same pattern as the violent ones. It's almost like a communicable disease.Yes and the violence is wrong, IMO.
But what is also wrong is judging all Muslims as violent because of the actions of a very small minority.
I agree. By doing so, you are falling into the same pattern as the violent ones. It's almost like a communicable disease.
I wonder if they've read Matthew 7?Yup.
I am serious when I say I know Christians who believe every Muslim man, woman, and child should be slaughtered because all Muslims are inherently violent.
I wonder if they've read Matthew 7?
Yes and the violence is wrong, IMO.
But what is also wrong is judging all Muslims as violent because of the actions of a very small minority.
Many people have killed of late for freedom. Many have killed for democracy. Are those who believe in freedom and democracy responsible for those who perpetuate violence in their name?
If an Irishman murders for sectarian reasons am I responsible for his behaviour? If he murders for religion is the reposnsibility on Catholics/Protestants/Christians everywhere?
Violence seems ubiquitous these days. My view is that violence is unacceptable - not Islam/Judaism/Christianity/SIkhism or whatever you're having yourself.
Yes I agree.
It is wrong when any group blames another group as if they are a monolith and all think the same.
But what I hear is it is just a small group. I agree it is but even a small group can cause extensive damage and death.
I agree that Muslims have a right to be angry and a right to protest, but not to do so violently.
No group has that right.
Many people have killed of late for freedom. Many have killed for democracy. Are those who believe in freedom and democracy responsible for those who perpetuate violence in their name?
If an Irishman murders for sectarian reasons am I responsible for his behaviour? If he murders for religion is the reposnsibility on Catholics/Protestants/Christians everywhere?
Violence seems ubiquitous these days. My view is that violence is unacceptable - not Islam/Judaism/Christianity/SIkhism or whatever you're having yourself.
If an Irishman murders for sectarian reasons am I responsible for his behaviour? If he murders for religion is the reposnsibility on Catholics/Protestants/Christians everywhere?
I'm heavily of Irish descent. Am I guilty by association for such atrocities?