• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Did Christ appear to other nations?

benjosh

Member
Joeboonda
You said.
WERE THE "OTHER SHEEP" IN THE AMERICAS?
Mormons use John 10:16—"I have sheep which are not of this fold"—to argue that Jesus needed to visit his people in the Americas. Who are these "other sheep" according to the Bible? Several passages clearly teach that these "other sheep" are the Gentiles. Study the following passages yourself. John 11:51-52; Acts 10:45; 11:18; 13:46; 14:27; 15:3-23; Galatians 3:28; Ephesians 2:11-19; 3:3-6.

You certainly used a lot of scriptures to prove your point. But, I think you have only proved something else.

You, and many other CHristians have the standard claim, "the Jesus of the Book of Mormon is not the same Jesus of the Bible, but you never go to the Book of Mormon and see what that Jesus says.

Do you think it will be too ridiculous to even look at.

Why don't you post what Jesus said on this lost sheep subject from the Book of Mormon. (If you need these portions I can post them for you to copy and paste into your explanation.)

You are confusing the entrance of the dispensation of grace to the Gentiles with the dispensation in which the tribes of Israel will be gathered according to the prophets. I noticed your absence of the OT prophets. Are you anti-Semetic?

Sincerely, BenJosh
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
Who are the "other sheep" mentioned in John 10:16?



Mormons claim that this verse:

  • John 10:16: And I have other sheep, that are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will heed my voice. So there shall be one flock, one shepherd.

refers to the Nephite people of the North American continent whom (they say) Christ visited, and not the Gentiles mentioned in the New Testament. However, Matthew 15:21-28 reveals that the "other sheep" WERE in fact the Gentiles:

  • Matthew 15:21-28: And Jesus went away from there and withdrew to the district of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and cried, "Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David; my daughter is severely possessed by a demon." But he did not answer her a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying, "Send her away, for she is crying after us." He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." But she came and knelt before him, saying, "Lord, help me." And he answered, "It is not fair to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs." She said, "Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table." Then Jesus answered her, "O woman, great is your faith! Be it done for you as you desire." And her daughter was healed instantly.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
joeboonda said:
Jesus indeed preached to the lost sheep of Israel, and many rejected him, and crucified him, and persecuted the apostles,so he turned to the Gentiles:

13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.
(King James Bible, Acts)
Perhaps you can give me an example of where Jesus Christ himself preached His gospel to the gentiles. This passage most certainly is not saying that. The Apostles spread Jesus' gospel to the Gentiles; He did not.

Don't make it into more than what the Bible plainly and simply teaches.
I don't believe I am. I have said nothing for which I cannot present Biblical evidence.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
joeboonda said:
Matthew 15:21-28 reveals that the "other sheep" WERE in fact the Gentiles:
  • Matthew 15:21-28: And Jesus went away from there and withdrew to the district of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and cried, "Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David; my daughter is severely possessed by a demon." But he did not answer her a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying, "Send her away, for she is crying after us." He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." But she came and knelt before him, saying, "Lord, help me." And he answered, "It is not fair to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs." She said, "Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table." Then Jesus answered her, "O woman, great is your faith! Be it done for you as you desire." And her daughter was healed instantly.
That strikes me as quite a stretch, Joe. Jesus most certainly did have mercy on the Canaanite woman. He even answered her prayer. But this passage certainly doesn't say that the Caananites were part of the house of Israel.
 

benjosh

Member
Joeboonda,

You didn't respond to my post. Did you see it? Looks like we posted within a minute of each other.
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
benjosh said:
Joeboonda
You said.


You certainly used a lot of scriptures to prove your point. But, I think you have only proved something else.

You, and many other CHristians have the standard claim, "the Jesus of the Book of Mormon is not the same Jesus of the Bible, but you never go to the Book of Mormon and see what that Jesus says.

Do you think it will be too ridiculous to even look at.

Why don't you post what Jesus said on this lost sheep subject from the Book of Mormon. (If you need these portions I can post them for you to copy and paste into your explanation.)

You are confusing the entrance of the dispensation of grace to the Gentiles with the dispensation in which the tribes of Israel will be gathered according to the prophets. I noticed your absence of the OT prophets. Are you anti-Semetic?

Sincerely, BenJosh
Hi, I am not anti-Semetic, I love the Jewish people, my brother is married to one, and my sister to an Arab, so there's that. Why don't I use the BOM? I do not believe it, I do not believe it is from God, and here is some stuff of why:



Testing The Book And The Prophet



1 Thessalonians 5:21 says, "Prove all things; hold fast to that which is good". When we attempt to witness to Mormons, we have to realize that this is not like witnessing to other non-believers. Most people go to a Mormon and want to immediately tell them about Jesus Christ or the Bible. However the Mormon says he already has Jesus and he not only has the Bible, but he has three other books that are scripture. (Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price) In fact, he will say he has more information or books than do the Christians. So in most cases, we have to take a different approach. We have learned over the years we must first call into question the creditability of the Book of Mormon and apply the test of a prophet to Joseph Smith.

In the introductory page of the Book of Mormon the first paragraph says, "The Book of Mormon is a volume of holy scripture comparable to the Bible. It is a record of God's dealings with the ancient inhabitants of the America's and contains, as does the Bible, the fullness of the everlasting gospel." When asking the Mormon what the words "fullness" and "everlasting" mean, they usually respond that fullness means complete and everlasting means forever. They will usually say this means the Book of Mormon is the complete gospel forever and ever. However, they will sometimes respond they have other books in addition to the Book of Mormon. Remind them, that may be true, but Joseph Smith said the Book of Mormon was the fullness of the everlasting gospel. And if that's true, then why was it necessary for him to write these other "scriptures," namely the Doctrine and Covenants and Pearl of Great Price, if the Book of Mormon was the complete gospel. We should be able to find all the Mormon doctrine in it. Pick any Mormon doctrine that is not a Christian belief and ask the Mormon to find it for you in the Book of Mormon. Things like becoming a god, or God was once a man on another planet and was promoted to become the god of this earth, or God has a body of flesh and bones and is not a spirit, or Jesus is the brother of Lucifer, or baptism of the dead or temple celestial marriage for eternity, etc. They will attempt to comply with your request so they can get credit for bringing you into Mormonism. There are very few Mormon teachings in the Book of Mormon. In most cases they don't know this, so we then share what the Book of Mormon does say. It often will agree with the Bible, primarily because Smith copied a lot of it from the Bible. Many times it will disagree with what Mormonism teaches and gives us an opportunity to witness to them.

The second thing is to use the Book of Mormon as a witnessing tool by comparing the 1830 Book of Mormon with the current one. Mormons will say there have never been any changes made to the book except for punctuation and spelling errors that have been corrected. Most of them do not know that there have been almost 4,000 changes made in it. Many of these changes are doctrinal and most Mormons are not aware of it. Yet when we read in the 6th paragraph of the introductory page of the current edition it says, "Concerning this record the Prophet Joseph Smith said, "I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than any other book." Some of the changes that come to mind are found in 1 Nephi 11:18-32. In each of these cases the title of the Lord has been changed from God to the son of God. This completely changes a doctrine of Mormonism because the believe that these are two distinct and different gods. One of these books is in error, which one is it? We carry in our book inventory several copies of the 1830 edition, as well as another book that completely identifies all 3,913 changes. This is pretty shocking to most Mormons because they have never been shown this before.

Finally, we have to put Joseph Smith to the test of a prophet. Deuteronomy 18:20-22 says "But the prophet which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die. and if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him." When we compare the prophecies of Joseph Smith with what really happened, we find that most did not come true. For example, in section 84 of the Doctrine and Covenants he said the Lord told him that before the current generation had all passed away, an LDS temple would be built in the western boundaries of Missouri. Smith gave that prophecy in 1832, so 164 years has gone by and there is still no LDS temple in the western boundaries of Missouri. And there is certainly not anyone still alive from 1832. In another prophecy Smith said the Lord had told him that Christ would return in 56 years (History of the Church, Vol. 2, pg. 182). That was in 1835, so it would make the date of the Lord's return in 1891. That didn't happen. Smith said the moon is inhabited with people six feet tall, dressed like Quakers and living to be about 1,000 years of age (Young Women's Journal, published by the Young Ladies' Mutual Improvement Associations of Zio, 1892, vol. 3, pp. 263-267). In Journals of Discourses, Vol. 13, page 271, we find President Brigham Young saying that not only is the moon inhabited, but so is the sun. When talking to a Mormon who is aware of these prophecies, some actually responded that humans have landed on the front side of the moon and not the back side. It's always amazing to us, the length a some Mormons will go to in defending his church, even if it doesn't make any sense at all. So when we apply the Biblical test of a prophet to Joseph Smith, we find that he has failed. Remember, according to the test, it would only take one failed prophesy to make a false prophet. In just one group of 64 prophecies he made, 58 never came true and most were dated so the Mormon cannot say that the event just hasn't happened yetp> Remember, our job is not to convert anyone, we are to plant seeds and let the Holy Spirit do the converting. Keep planting seeds and praying for a harvest. God will bring them to Himself as He uses us as His instruments. What a joy that is!

Plagarized from:- http://www.concernedchristians.org/nocomparison_bom1.php
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
And more on why I do not believe the BOM:

Claims Of The Book Of Mormon

Is there any archaeological evidence for the claims made
in The Book of Mormon regarding Jesus' visit to the Americas?


book_of_mormon.jpg
The Book of Mormon is advertised by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints as "another testament of Jesus Christ" and specifically of the account of his supposed visit to the American continent (The Book of Mormon, 3 Nephi 11:1-17). Many scholars and laymen have searched known history of the Americas for evidence that The Book of Mormon is true, as has similarly been done with the Bible in the Middle East. While the Bible continues to prove to be accurate through archaeological findings, evidence for claims made in The Book of Mormon continue to be lacking. Before I show you some examples of the lack of archaeological evidence to support The Book of Mormon, let me say this; in the hundreds of hours that I have spent witnessing to my Mormon friends, the conversations usually will end with the Mormon stating this; "It really doesn't matter how many ways you disprove the authenticity of The Book of Mormon, I still believe it is true." I am not saying that it is not important to examine the evidence, because it is. In fact, Scripture says we are to test all things using the Bible as the standard for truth (1 Thess. 5:21). Show your Mormon friends the inconsistencies in The Book of Mormon and be prepared to test any claim that they make with what the Bible has to say. Finally, pray that what you have shown your friend will take root in his mind and overcome the lie in his heart. Always remember, the Holy Spirit changes peoples hearts -- not what we say or do. According to the Smithsonian Institute of Washington, D.C., USA, the following items (which, according to The Book of Mormon, existed in the Americas between 600 B.C. and 421 A.D.) have absolutely no evidence for existing in the America's during the time in question:

  • Silk - Alma 4:6, Nephi 13:7, Alma 1:29
  • Horses - Enos 1:21, Alma 18:9, 3 Nephi 3: 1, Nephi 18:25
  • Cement - Helaman 3:7,11
  • Steel - Jarom 1:8, 2 Nephi 5:15,16, 1 Nephi 4:9, 16:18
  • Iron - 2 Nephi 5:15, 20:34, Jarom 1:8, Mosiah 11:8
  • Coins - Alma 11:5-19
  • Donkeys - 1 Nephi 18:25, Mosiah 5:14, 12:5
  • Cattle, Cow, and Oxen - Enos 1:21; 3 Nephi 3:22, 6: 1 Nephi 18:25
  • Pigs - 3 Nephi 7:8
  • Grain and Wheat - Mosiah 9:9; Helaman 11:17
If The Book of Mormon is true, certainly some evidence for the items mentioned above should have been unearthed by modern-day archeologists. But where are the "Houses of Cement" mentioned in Helaman; where are the objects of steel, iron, and brass that are mentioned throughout The Book of Mormon? Has the Mormon church uncovered even one coin as mentioned in the book of Alma? Mormon 6:9-15 states that many thousands of men fought a great battle armed with swords, bows, arrows and axes, but have archaeologists discovered any of these items dating back to that time period on this continent? According to Ether 15:2, two million Jaredite peoples (men, women and children) were killed in battle, yet there is not a trace of this battle anywhere. Ether 15:15 claims that men, women, and children armed with shields, breastplates, and headplates, fought a great battle with much loss of life -- yet not one article of battle has been found to date.

The Smithsonian Institute has issued a statement regarding archaeological evidence and The Book of Mormon.
  • "The Smithsonian Institution has never used The Book of Mormon in any way as a scientific guide. Smithsonian archaeologists see no direct connection between the archaeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book."
The Book of Mormon is regarded by some to be nothing more than a story that Joseph Smith constructed in his mind as a boy. In fact, the book History of Joseph Smith (p. 85), written by Joseph Smith's mother, Lucy Mack Smith, states:

  • "During our evening conversations, Joseph would occasionally give us some of the most amusing recitals that could be imagined. He would describe the ancient inhabitants of this continent, their dress, mode of traveling, and the animals upon which they rode; their cities, their buildings, with every particular; their mode of warfare; and also their religious worship. This he would do with as much ease, seemingly, as if he had spent his whole life among them."
How is it that Joseph Smith told these stories several years before he allegedly found the golden plates and wrote The Book of Mormon? Mormons sometimes claim that South American ruins supposedly contain proof that Jesus visited this continent. This is simply not true and I encourage those confronted with these claims to find any evidence from non-Mormon archaeologists.



Plagarized from: http://www.concernedchristians.org/nocomparison_bom2.php
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
Katzpur said:
[/list]That strikes me as quite a stretch, Joe. Jesus most certainly did have mercy on the Canaanite woman. He even answered her prayer. But this passage certainly doesn't say that the Caananites were part of the house of Israel.
15:21 Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.
15:22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
15:23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
15:25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
15:26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
15:27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
15:28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.
(King James Bible, Matthew)

The bold is what I am referring to, He would not even talk to her, then he said he came to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. He came, in the flesh, and preached to the lost house of Israel, for they were indeed lost, and then they crucified him. I would like you to note, too that Jesus accepted worship, do you worship Jesus?
 

benjosh

Member
Joeboonda,

I am beginning to think you may be a bit fanatical. You crank out anti book of Mormon materail like a photocopier at Bible Answer Man.
Is that what you really are? A robotical ANswer Man ?

Your refusal to take the challenge to compare the Jesus of the Book of Mormon with the Jesus of the Bible.

Says a lot about you.

Let me rephrase the anti-Semitic question ( and please don't paste a page and a half on replacement theology.)
Do you believe the CHristian church replaced Israel? Are the prophecies regarding Israel's restoration now transferred to Christians?

BenJosh
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
joeboonda said:
15:21 Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.
15:22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
15:23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
15:25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
15:26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
15:27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
15:28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.
(King James Bible, Matthew)

The bold is what I am referring to, He would not even talk to her, then he said he came to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. He came, in the flesh, and preached to the lost house of Israel, for they were indeed lost, and then they crucified him.
So what's the problem? You've just quoted the verse in which Jesus said He was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Do you think that, in blessing her, He was saying, in effect, "And, by the way, I'm including the Caananites in this group."?

I would like you to note, too that Jesus accepted worship, do you worship Jesus?
What kind of a question is that, Joe?
 

benjosh

Member
Katzpur,

Your quotes from the Bible are appropriate. I suspect they will not receive any serious consideration. I believe Joe can only cut and paste.


BenJOsh
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
I am beginning to think you may be a bit fanatical. You crank out anti book of Mormon materail like a photocopier at Bible Answer Man.
Is that what you really are? A robotical ANswer Man ?
I do try to post the truth, did you bother to read it?
Your refusal to take the challenge to compare the Jesus of the Book of Mormon with the Jesus of the Bible.

Says a lot about you.
The Jesus of Mormonism IS different than the Jesus of the Bible, perhaps I will spare you the robotical answer...for now. :)
Let me rephrase the anti-Semitic question ( and please don't paste a page and a half on replacement theology.)
Do you believe the CHristian church replaced Israel? Are the prophecies regarding Israel's restoration now transferred to Christians?
No, salvation is offered to the Jew and the Greek. Afterall the first Christians were Jews. But many Jews rejected the Messiah, but, now there are Messianic Jews who believe. I believe in these last days, and especially during the Great Tribulation, God will deal with the Jews and many will be saved.
BenJosh[/QUOTE]
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
Question: If accepting Christ is the key, why can't a person be a Mormon and accept Christ?




  • Answer: From the last section it is clear the Bible teaches salvation by faith alone without works. The problem I find with the LDS church is that it teaches faith in "a" Jesus Christ that is not the Jesus of the Bible. This is why Biblical Christians say that Mormons are not Christians. If a Mormon was to believe in the Bible and accept the Biblical Jesus Christ as their Savior they would then be Christians. Upon seeing who the real Jesus Christ is they would leave Mormonism. In my last church I had five families in my church who were Mormons who were saved and they immediately left the LDS church. All but two persons were born into Mormonism. They left the LDS Church because they learned Mormonism does not worship the God and Jesus Christ of the Bible. Let me explain.

    To the Mormon, Jesus, is the first born son of their exalted "man" god in heaven. Satan was one of his sons just like every person on earth. This god was a man who was born in sin on another planet out in the universe. He was made the god of this world because of his good works on this other planet. He earned godhood and was thus appointed by the counsel of gods in the heavens, to be the god of earth. If you are an informed Mormon you know that this is what the LDS church has always taught. The god of this world is a god of flesh and bone and was once a man, like we are men, who became a god.

    The Mormon Jesus is the son of this man-become-god of flesh and bone. Clearly, this is not taught in the Bible and the Mormon god and Jesus are not the true God and Jesus of the Bible. Thus to place ones faith in them is not placing one's faith in the Biblical God and Jesus of the Bible. (see Matt. 24:24, Mark 13:22) A god that does not exist cannot save. No matter how sincerely one believes in an idol, the idol cannot save. (Isaiah 45 for how God describes idol worship)

    That is why, we who are biblical Christians reject the teachings of the LDS church. The Mormon prophets historically have openly ridiculed those of us who believe in the God, Jesus and Holy Spirit that the Bible reveals.

    The Bible alone is my authority for my faith and practice. Any teaching that is not in accord with what the Bible says I must reject, because it is false. The Bible says God is not a man. (Num. 23:19, Hosea 11:9) It says he is a Spirit. (John 4:24, Isa 45:5, Psa. 90:2) Thus, I cannot accept that God is or ever was a man and the Bible proves the Mormon god to be false.

    The LDS church believes there are in fact there are millions of gods out in the Universe. Yes, they say they are monotheistic because they only worship the god of this earth, but they believe their are many other gods and that might be a god one day themselves. At the present time the LDS church reports that it has over nine million members. If only ten percent of their membership were worthy were exalted to godhood, there would be 900,000 new gods.

    Mormon Apostle Orson Pratt made this statement concerning the Mormon doctrine of the plurality of Gods: "If we should take a million of worlds like this and number their particles, we should find that there are MORE GODS than there are particles of matter in those worlds." (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 2, page 345)

    The Bible says, "Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me." (Isaiah 43:10) "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God." (Isaiah 44:6) In simple terms God says there are no other gods, but the God, and men who aspire to godhood do so in vain. There is not one hint in the Bible that men can become gods.

    The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is God. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (John 1:1) Some have tried to discount this verse by saying the "Word" is not a reference to Jesus, but what He said. But read verse 14, "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth." (Also see Rev. 19:13) No Bible scholar questions the authenticity of these verses. No manuscript reads differently from what is correctly translated in our KJV Bible. Jesus was God incarnate in flesh. I cannot explain it nor can anyone else. As a man, I am a material being living in a physical world and I cannot understand the spirit world of God. All I know about the spiritual world is what He reveals in the Bible. He says this is true and I accept it because God said it. I cannot explain gravity, nor can any scientists on this earth. They can see what it does, describe its effects, but they do not know what it is. No one would be so foolish as to reject gravity because they could not explain or understand it. Further, when a man explains or describes anything he always uses and compares it with things he knows. Man knows nothing of the spiritual world and has nothing on earth to compare it with. That is why the false religions of the world always make their gods and heaven like the earth they know. They have nothing more to use to describe it. The Bible just states as fact that Jesus Christ is God and does not try to explain it, because God knows we can not understand it now. Paul and John both saw things in heaven and were told by God not to reveal it. (see 2 Cor. 12:2-4, Rev. 10:4) It is easy to understand that only God could atone for sins, because only God is sinless. If Jesus was only a man he would have been born with the sin nature. He was perfect and only God incarnate in man could be a perfect man.

 

benjosh

Member
JOeboonda, you said,
I do try to post the truth, did you bother to read it?

I get the impression that you are not really serious about having a give and take conversation.
I am very familiar with the way anti-Book of Mormon people can't actually debate. The tools in their bag are primarily character assassination and the use of the answers that have been around for a very long time.
You have not seriously considered anything I have said, You have not seriously considered anything that Katspur has said, and I am well familiar with the material you've posted.
So, if all you can do is cut and paste. Then it's time to end this.

I know that you do not represent all other Christians. But unless you can prove you can reason . . . . . . you're not going to even have credibility with your fellow Christians.
If you will read or listen to some of Walter Martins early works you may figure out what you are doing wrong.

BenJosh
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
benjosh said:
Katzpur,

Your quotes from the Bible are appropriate. I suspect they will not receive any serious consideration. I believe Joe can only cut and paste.


BenJOsh
Yes, evidently desperation is setting in. It would be impossible to respond to any of these accusations as fast as they materialize. Unless Joe has an incredible library, including many 19th century publications which are not available in their entirety online, he is obviously resorting to tactics he has been asked time and time again to avoid. In addition, many of the points he brings up have already been addressed by several of the Latter-day Saints on the forum. He continues, however, to ignore everything we have told him.

Kathryn
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
joeboonda said:
The Jesus of Mormonism IS different than the Jesus of the Bible, perhaps I will spare you the robotical answer...for now. :)
Joe,

Jonny challenged you less than a week ago to a one-on-one debate on this very subject, and you refused, saying that you were sick and didn't have time to respond. I'm so happy to see that you're feeling better and now appear to have plenty of time on your hands. But, I can't help but wonder... When jonny presented his suggested rules for the one-on-one debate, he specifically said, "No cutting and pasting." You know, I've just got to wonder if maybe that didn't have something to do with your refusal to debate him. Someone who actually had anything other than a very rudimentary background on the subject of Mormonism, Joe, would not have to resort to such tactics. What's your excuse?

Kathryn
 

benjosh

Member
Katzpur,

The explanation that Jesus gives in 3rd Nephi re: the lost sheep and the disciples understanding (lack of actually) about them is very plain. And it fits the New Testament account to a tee.

BenJosh
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
Katzpur said:
Joe,

Jonny challenged you less than a week ago to a one-on-one debate on this very subject, and you refused, saying that you were sick and didn't have time to respond. I'm so happy to see that you're feeling better and now appear to have plenty of time on your hands. But, I can't help but wonder... When jonny presented his suggested rules for the one-on-one debate, he specifically said, "No cutting and pasting." You know, I've just got to wonder if maybe that didn't have something to do with your refusal to debate him. Someone who actually had anything other than a very rudimentary background on the subject of Mormonism, Joe, would not have to resort to such tactics. What's your excuse?

Kathryn
You all get too upset, lol. I just do not like typing for 2 hours what I can paste in 2 minutes. And I do not like the whole pitched debate idea. I would rather share information and discuss it in a friendly easy going manner with no time limitations. I am sometimes not here for weeks at a time. I actually have been reading a lot about Mormonism and the differences of our religions. The more I read, the more I am convinced that Mormonism is a false religion. I am sorry if that offends you, but I believe I must tell the truth of what I believe, just like you must tell what you believe to be true. If you actually believe that God was a man who became God, and there are many God's out there and that he is not the only God and has never changed, and that Christ is not his only begotten Son, but instead a spirit brother of Satan, who, by the way is called an angel in the Bible, a created being, whereas Christ was begotten not made. If you want to believe your religion is true than go ahead, but as sincere as you are, I believe you are sincerely wrong and are worshipping a false God and a false Christ not represented in the Holy Bible which has archeological, medical, historical proofs to back it up. Ok, no cut and paste here! Love ya anyway!

Sincerely,

Joeboonda
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
The Bible says, "Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me." (Isaiah 43:10) "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God." (Isaiah 44:6) In simple terms God says there are no other gods.

How do you explain this verse? there was no God before God, nor any after him, He is the first and last and beside me there is no God? If he was once a man that attained Godhood through his own efforts, then there was a God or Gods and universes before him. This contradicts the Bible. God is God, he has always been, he has never changed, he is all knowing, all present, and He is the only God there is anywhere. He (Jesus) made the universe. He made the sun, moon, and stars on the 4th day. God is God and there are no other Gods. None before, none after. This is the Bible truth. Why change it? Why? Why don't you see the error here??? And again I ask this with my own typing fingers.
 

Popeyesays

Well-Known Member
joeboonda said:
The Bible says, "Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me." (Isaiah 43:10) "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God." (Isaiah 44:6) In simple terms God says there are no other gods.

How do you explain this verse? there was no God before God, nor any after him, He is the first and last and beside me there is no God? If he was once a man that attained Godhood through his own efforts, then there was a God or Gods and universes before him. This contradicts the Bible. God is God, he has always been, he has never changed, he is all knowing, all present, and He is the only God there is anywhere. He (Jesus) made the universe. He made the sun, moon, and stars on the 4th day. God is God and there are no other Gods. None before, none after. This is the Bible truth. Why change it? Why? Why don't you see the error here??? And again I ask this with my own typing fingers.
I would point out that the quoted text does not mention Jesus at all. You are inserting your own contention with no support or argument. God made the universe. Not Jesus.

Regards,
Scott
 
Top