SLAMH
Active Member
fantôme profane;3033967 said:Are you reading anything now?
I want to start with this, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex
Do you have any suggestions ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
fantôme profane;3033967 said:Are you reading anything now?
Darwin can be kind of heavy... he was a decent enough writer for his time, but the time difference can make his books a bit of a slog.I want to start with this, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex
Do you have any suggestions ?
Reading Darwin is not really a good source for information about modern science.I want to start with this, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex
Do you have any suggestions ?
Still, if you want to learn about the early ideas being discussed and Darwin's personal intellectual "evolution" you can't get a much better source. It's really enlightening to see how Darwin pushes himself to the edges of his Victorian sensibilities. He has some very heterodox ideas (full humanity for all humans) but can't quite seem to bring himself all the way to modern thinking.
wa:do
*edit... I should add that if you are going to start with Darwin, you should start with On the Origin of Species. You will have a better idea of his concepts of evolutionary theory that he uses as a basis for The Decent of Man.
fantôme profane;3034268 said:Reading Darwin is not really a good source for information about modern science.
Click on the link in my signature.
True, but it is a good source for what Darwin actually said.fantôme profane;3034268 said:Reading Darwin is not really a good source for information about modern science.
Click on the link in my signature.
Yes, I'm interested on the thought from which he established his theory.
Thanks.
Thank you so much , but I think I'm going to start with Darwin's books.
I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from reading Darwin. I found Descent and Origin both very readable once I got into them. But he is not going to find anything about genetics from Darwin, and that is an important part of understanding evolution.True, but it is a good source for what Darwin actually said.
There are several good books on modern evolutionary theory that would be more informative on the science as it stands today.
Ken Miller is always a good place to start... as is Carl Zimmer, who I really can't recommend enough.
Amazon.com: The Tangled Bank: An Introduction to Evolution (9780981519470): Carl Zimmer: Books
wa:do
Anytime, but be warned that Darwin was an extremely prolific writer as well. He wrote several books as well as papers on subjects from the eating habits of worms to the care of pigeons to fossil mammals of South America and all of them are important in his intellectual development.Yes, I'm interested on the thought from which he established his theory.
Thanks.
Very true... but once you know Darwin's ideas you can see how genetics was able to substantiate nearly all of Darwin's ideas.fantôme profane;3034310 said:I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from reading Darwin. I found Descent and Origin both very readable once I got into them. But he is not going to find anything about genetics from Darwin, and that is an important part of understanding evolution.
Very interesting?Very interesting article and expresses it better than I have ever read before.
Why Darwinism Matters. Washing DC Policy Briefing May 10, 2000: Pearcey, Nancy. :yes:
If your friend wants to read about the Theory of Evolution, there's plenty very good scientific literature.I have a friend said the evolution is wrong, because every time he reads a book he finds them referring to it as the theory of evolution. So, it is is just a theory, no need to read the rest !!><.
I've looked at the fox
I've looked at the rocks
I've looked at animal Mating
I've looked at radiometric dating
I've looked in historical texts
I've looked in religious sects
in scientific minds
and archelogical finds
I know its not nice
but I don't give a damn
I don't like Ken eggs and Ham
I think you're giving him too much credit.*sigh*
Another ttechsan "hit and run".
SecondedI think you're giving him too much credit.
Thirded (or as a biblical literalist might have it, pi'd).Seconded
I have a friend said the evolution is wrong, because every time he reads a book he finds them referring to it as the theory of evolution. So, it is is just a theory, no need to read the rest !!><.