• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who would you choose?

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
If the world was falling apart, and there were two political leaders who took over the two remaining lands. You get to decide who takes over the whole two lands.

Heath, the first political leader, is going to kill off millions of people, but it doesn't include you.

George, the other, is going to kill off the same amount of people, but he wants different people to die, not what Heath wants, and the deaths include you.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
This situation would not arise with out millions of people dieing off in the first place. Also not enough info
 

839311

Well-Known Member
If the world was falling apart, and there were two political leaders who took over the two remaining lands. You get to decide who takes over the whole two lands.

Heath, the first political leader, is going to kill off millions of people, but it doesn't include you.

George, the other, is going to kill off the same amount of people, but he wants different people to die, not what Heath wants, and the deaths include you.

If that was the only information available to me Id be a huge fan of Heath! :D
 

DreadFish

Cosmic Vagabond
My decision would hinge on one incredibly important piece of information: What is the criteria for who these leaders are killing?

What if the reason why Heath is killing millions of people is because, besides me, all those people committed mass murder or were all part of a million man army that led to the genocide of a people?

And what if George was just a maniacal dictator who just liked killing people? I mean, sure he's being fair by not discriminating, but it doesn't mean he's any more ethical for it.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
As others have said, not enough information. In general, though, neither sounds better than the other. Me dying versus not dying is hardly the end of the universe as we know it. :shrug:
 

9Westy9

Sceptic, Libertarian, Egalitarian
Premium Member
Based on the info I'd choose Heath. Pretty easy decision for me
 
Top