• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jehovah's Witnesses and The New World Translation

Look erm Bang Bang, it seems the only website you didn't quote was watchtower.org, the ones behind this 'fault' you enlighten us to.

A more plausible debate, may have taken details from both sides, yet you fail to do this. A courtcase doesn't just listen the victim, but it listens to the accused as well. Maybe you should do the same.

Another thing, if you're going to read freeminds.org, those lovely people who think we're all brainwashed, then yes, i can see why your views on us are slightly negative.

I'm sure if I didn't know the linguistic techniques and motives they use on the website, i could quite possibly become an atheist in no time myself.

As jehovah's witnesses, we do study a lot of the scriputes, and we also get background knowledge on why the scriputures were translated in certain ways.

We are not sheep, contrary to what you may believe, or what freeminds.org has said.

THE Bible teaching that God is one is called monotheism. And L. L. Paine, professor of ecclesiastical history, indicates that monotheism in its purest form does not allow for a Trinity: "The Old Testament is strictly monotheistic. God is a single personal being. The idea that a trinity is to be found there . . . is utterly without foundation."
Was there any change from monotheism after Jesus came to the earth? Paine answers: "On this point there is no break between the Old Testament and the New. The monotheistic tradition is continued. Jesus was a Jew, trained by Jewish parents in the Old Testament scriptures. His teaching was Jewish to the core; a new gospel indeed, but not a new theology. . . . And he accepted as his own belief the great text of Jewish monotheism: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one God.'"

Those words are found at Deuteronomy 6:4. The Catholic New Jerusalem Bible (NJB) here reads: "Listen, Israel: Yahweh our God is the one, the only Yahweh."* In the grammar of that verse, the word "one" has no plural modifiers to suggest that it means anything but one individual.

Thousands of times throughout the Bible, God is spoken of as one person. When he speaks, it is as one undivided individual. The Bible could not be any clearer on this. As God states: "I am Jehovah. That is my name; and to no one else shall I give my own glory." (Isaiah 42:8) "I am Yahweh your God . . . You shall have no gods except me." - Exodus 20:2, 3, JB.

JESUS called God "the only true God." (John 17:3) Never did he refer to God as a deity of plural persons. That is why nowhere in the Bible is anyone but God called Almighty

Jesus says:
"Yahweh created me, first-fruits of his fashioning, before the oldest of his works. Before the mountains were settled, before the hills, I came to birth; before he had made the earth, the countryside, and the first elements of the world." (Proverbs 8:12, 22, 25, 26, NJB

Notice that isn't a New World Translation



[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Could God Be Tempted?[/font]

ruleheader.gif



AT MATTHEW 4:1, Jesus is spoken of as being "tempted by the Devil." After showing Jesus "all the kingdoms of the world and their glory," Satan said: "All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me." (Matthew 4:8, 9) Satan was trying to cause Jesus to be disloyal to God.

But what test of loyalty would that be if Jesus were God? Could God rebel against himself? No, but angels and humans could rebel against God and did. The temptation of Jesus would make sense only if he was, not God, but a separate individual who had his own free will, one who could have been disloyal had he chosen to be, such as an angel or a human. On the other hand, it is unimaginable that God could sin and be disloyal to himself. "Perfect is his activity . . . A God of faithfulness, . . . righteous and upright is he." (Deuteronomy 32:4) So if Jesus had been God, he could not have been tempted.—James 1:13. Not being God, Jesus could have been disloyal. But he remained faithful, saying: "Go away, Satan! For it is written, 'It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.'"—Matthew 4:10.



The Christian apostle Paul did not indicate any change in the nature of God either, even after Jesus came to the earth. He wrote: "God is only one."—Galatians 3:20; see also 1 Corinthians 8:4-6.
 
Also, this point you make by using this scripture:

NWT: because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist,

NIV: For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

NASB: For by Him all things were created, {both} in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.

KJV: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.


There is a failure to quote the previous verses which states: ..'who delivered us out of the power of darkness, and translated us into the kingdom of the song of his love; in whom we have our redemption, the forgiveness of our sins: WHO IS THE IMAGE OF THE INVISIBLE God, the FIRSTBORN of all creation.

Notice, God is clearly defined as invisible yet Jesus was clearly VISIBLE as God's son and representative. You shall also notice Jesus is the FIRSTBORN of all creation.

See, im not a scholar and even i can make a point. As regards your other verses you quote, i shall look later.

I'd like to comment on a good point someone else later as well. Good night. :)
 

Deut 13:1

Well-Known Member
Excuse my ignorance, but what's the NWT?

Edit 1: Also, I agree, there is no 100% perfect translation. Give me any translation, and I can find at least one mistake from the 'literal' translation. Unless of course they don't claim to be literal.

Edit 2: I think it was Jayhawker who said he owned like 4-5 different versions of just the TNK - All major Jewish translations.
 

Buttons*

Glass half Panda'd
Deut. 10:19 said:
Nor is the Robin Hood. So?

Thank you for the dictionary refrence *smiles*

I just think we should use the names dieties were originally given... thats all...
 

Bangbang

Active Member
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT said:
Look erm Bang Bang, it seems the only website you didn't quote was watchtower.org, the ones behind this 'fault' you enlighten us to.

A more plausible debate, may have taken details from both sides, yet you fail to do this. A courtcase doesn't just listen the victim, but it listens to the accused as well. Maybe you should do the same.

Another thing, if you're going to read freeminds.org, those lovely people who think we're all brainwashed, then yes, i can see why your views on us are slightly negative.

I'm sure if I didn't know the linguistic techniques and motives they use on the website, i could quite possibly become an atheist in no time myself.

As jehovah's witnesses, we do study a lot of the scriputes, and we also get background knowledge on why the scriputures were translated in certain ways.

We are not sheep, contrary to what you may believe, or what freeminds.org has said.

THE Bible teaching that God is one is called monotheism. And L. L. Paine, professor of ecclesiastical history, indicates that monotheism in its purest form does not allow for a Trinity: "The Old Testament is strictly monotheistic. God is a single personal being. The idea that a trinity is to be found there . . . is utterly without foundation."
Was there any change from monotheism after Jesus came to the earth? Paine answers: "On this point there is no break between the Old Testament and the New. The monotheistic tradition is continued. Jesus was a Jew, trained by Jewish parents in the Old Testament scriptures. His teaching was Jewish to the core; a new gospel indeed, but not a new theology. . . . And he accepted as his own belief the great text of Jewish monotheism: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one God.'"

Those words are found at Deuteronomy 6:4. The Catholic New Jerusalem Bible (NJB) here reads: "Listen, Israel: Yahweh our God is the one, the only Yahweh."* In the grammar of that verse, the word "one" has no plural modifiers to suggest that it means anything but one individual.

Thousands of times throughout the Bible, God is spoken of as one person. When he speaks, it is as one undivided individual. The Bible could not be any clearer on this. As God states: "I am Jehovah. That is my name; and to no one else shall I give my own glory." (Isaiah 42:8) "I am Yahweh your God . . . You shall have no gods except me." - Exodus 20:2, 3, JB.

JESUS called God "the only true God." (John 17:3) Never did he refer to God as a deity of plural persons. That is why nowhere in the Bible is anyone but God called Almighty

Jesus says:
"Yahweh created me, first-fruits of his fashioning, before the oldest of his works. Before the mountains were settled, before the hills, I came to birth; before he had made the earth, the countryside, and the first elements of the world." (Proverbs 8:12, 22, 25, 26, NJB

Notice that isn't a New World Translation



[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Could God Be Tempted?[/font]

ruleheader.gif



AT MATTHEW 4:1, Jesus is spoken of as being "tempted by the Devil." After showing Jesus "all the kingdoms of the world and their glory," Satan said: "All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me." (Matthew 4:8, 9) Satan was trying to cause Jesus to be disloyal to God.

But what test of loyalty would that be if Jesus were God? Could God rebel against himself? No, but angels and humans could rebel against God and did. The temptation of Jesus would make sense only if he was, not God, but a separate individual who had his own free will, one who could have been disloyal had he chosen to be, such as an angel or a human. On the other hand, it is unimaginable that God could sin and be disloyal to himself. "Perfect is his activity . . . A God of faithfulness, . . . righteous and upright is he." (Deuteronomy 32:4) So if Jesus had been God, he could not have been tempted.—James 1:13. Not being God, Jesus could have been disloyal. But he remained faithful, saying: "Go away, Satan! For it is written, 'It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.'"—Matthew 4:10.



The Christian apostle Paul did not indicate any change in the nature of God either, even after Jesus came to the earth. He wrote: "God is only one."—Galatians 3:20; see also 1 Corinthians 8:4-6.
:clap Good post.........however I myself do not and never preached that the Trinity exists.I have never believed in a Trinity however I do still question the valdity that a omnipotenc,omniscience,omnipresence god even exists. The quotes mentioned above in my posts regarding the Trinity are not quotes from me but from other websites. I only included them because I wanted you and others to see the argument. Now we have both views here and that is good.

  • <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Omnipotence - He has the power to do anything He desires (Job 42:2; Luke 1:37). <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Omnipresence - He is in all places, all the time (Jer. 23:24; 1 Kings 8:27; Psalm 90:2).
  • Omniscience - He knows all things (1 John 3:20).
    Out of these attributes flow His works:
  • <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Election - choosing who is saved (John 1:12-13; 6:37-40; Eph. 1:4;11; Rom.. 8:29-30; Acts 13:48; Phil. 1:29). <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Creation - bringing the universe into existence (Isaiah 44:24; Col. 1:16-18).
  • Providence - guiding and providing for His creation (Psalm 135:7; Ecc. 3:13; Acts 14:17).
Here is an interesting read.
  • <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Omnipotence - He has the power to do anything He desires (Job 42:2; Luke 1:37). <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Omnipresence - He is in all places, all the time (Jer. 23:24; 1 Kings 8:27; Psalm 90:2).
  • Omniscience - He knows all things (1 John 3:20).
    Out of these attributes flow His works:
  • <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Election - choosing who is saved (John 1:12-13; 6:37-40; Eph. 1:4;11; Rom.. 8:29-30; Acts 13:48; Phil. 1:29). <LI style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Creation - bringing the universe into existence (Isaiah 44:24; Col. 1:16-18).
  • Providence - guiding and providing for His creation (Psalm 135:7; Ecc. 3:13; Acts 14:17).
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
BangBang,

religion:depends on my mood
gender_Undisclosed.gif

What sort of a mood are you in today ?:D
 
The power of truth can be found in the effect truth has on those that rail against it. Many Ex-Jehovahs Witnesses become staunch apostates that go on a life long quest to turn others against even having an open mind towards the beliefs of JW's. I lived in Brooklyn for awhile and there lived a man who spent EVERY SINGLE DAY of his life standing on a street corner screaming at the top of his lungs all kinds of vile, hateful, rants about jw's. What is of interest is that while JW's offer a real BIBLICAL HOPE for this messed up world..apostates spew only venom and offer NO BIBLICAL HOPE to comfort anyone.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
searcher63 said:
The power of truth can be found in the effect truth has on those that rail against it.
That is, at best, an inane and self serving statement. If someone has presented a baseless argument against the JW, expose it as such. Frenetic shouting about "BIBLICAL HOPE" does little to support your position.
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
I have a hard time understanding ANY religion that adds to or takes away from the Bible.

I encourage JW to do a little research on a man by the name of Charles T. Russel. He was the forefather of the JW movement. You'll find that the New World Translation of the Bible was pioneered by people with LITTLE if ANY Greek and Hebrew training...people who had an underlying agenda...they wanted to change the way the Bible read.

Further, when you reject the Trinity concept...you've missed God's plan for your salvation completely. Jesus Christ IS the key to your salvation. And when you accept Jesus Christ into your life....you receive the Holy Spirit of God...who resides within you...guiding and directing you in your ways. That's the trinity...right there. Father, Son and Holy Ghost...all separate yet the SAME.

And you know...my question to JW is this. Where's your peace? I know...because the BIBLE clearly states this...that the way to salvation is through Jesus Christ. JW go door to door trying to recruit people into their religion and they're ignoring the Great Commission that we're responsible for carrying out which is to spread the GOSPEL of Jesus Christ. I don't have to BUY my way into heaven...I'm saved through Jesus Christ...now I have to strive to be like him...to live my life according to the Bible...

And as for the Mormons, I've known some beautiful people in my life, both Mormon and Jehovah's Witness yet I cannot and will not ever understand how intelligent people completely violate such a predominate Bible teaching without a second thought...do not ADD or TAKE AWAY from the BIBLE.

Yet, the Jehovah's Witnesses bash other translations of the Bible...which are FAR more accurate. And they rely so heavily upon instruction within their churches. When Jesus Christ died...the veil in the Tabernacle was torn...for a reason. We then had an open door to God through Jesus Christ, his son. We don't HAVE to EVER step foot in a church to develop a fruitfull relationship with our God. It's helpful...to keep us focused but all we need to live good lives...is an open heart and a Bible.

And with LDS...there's just so much to the religion that isn't Biblical. So much faith is put in the teachings of a man...a man, much like Russel who decided that he had the authority to change the bible to suit his fancy. I don't see honor in that...I can't. You don't need a separate book to instruct you how to live. The Bible is sufficient. HIS word is more than sufficient.

I do respect people as individuals, despite their religious believes. I've had such close friends who believe differently than I do. So, please don't misconstrue my post as a personal attack against anyone individually. I don't know anyone on these forums well enough to make personal comments about them. These are simply my opinions and I don't intend them as personal attacks...I'm just airing my concerns...

And despite our differences, I truly DO wish peace and happiness to all...:)
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Jayhawker Soule said:
Precisely how an observant Jew might view Christianities. ;)
It's the contradictions and apparent errors that they perceive in Christendom. Not the additions or substractions. For they have added and subtracted in the past.

~Victor
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Victor said:
It's the contradictions and apparent errors that they perceive in Christendom.
Thank you for explaining to me the Jewish point of view.

Victor said:
Not the additions or substractions. For they have added and subtracted in the past.
What have they added and subtracted in the past? When? Who?
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Jayhawker Soule said:
Thank you for explaining to me the Jewish point of view.

What have they added and subtracted in the past? When? Who?

Where to start? Put it this way, they did not begin [From Genesis] with what they have now. Their relationship with God was that of progression. From Abraham, Noah, Moses, etc. built up to what they have now.

From a Jew's perspective, did I get this right?

~Victor
 

Deut 13:1

Well-Known Member
Victor said:
Where to start? Put it this way, they did not begin [From Genesis] with what they have now. Their relationship with God was that of progression. From Abraham, Noah, Moses, etc. built up to what they have now.

From a Jew's perspective, did I get this right?

~Victor
Wait and be vauge... as Jayhawker said, details...
 

nutshell

Well-Known Member
dawny0826 said:
I have a hard time understanding ANY religion that adds to or takes away from the Bible.

Further, when you reject the Trinity concept...you've missed God's plan for your salvation completely. Jesus Christ IS the key to your salvation. And when you accept Jesus Christ into your life....you receive the Holy Spirit of God...who resides within you...guiding and directing you in your ways. That's the trinity...right there. Father, Son and Holy Ghost...all separate yet the SAME.
I agree with the above, but I'm assuming that by "SAME" you mean same being while the LDS interpret this to mean same purpose. This is a matter of interpretation of the Bible and neither view can be given more validation than the other. It is an interpreatation based on individual understanding and faith.

dawny0826 said:
And as for the Mormons, I've known some beautiful people in my life, both Mormon and Jehovah's Witness yet I cannot and will not ever understand how intelligent people completely violate such a predominate Bible teaching without a second thought...do not ADD or TAKE AWAY from the BIBLE.
The LDS Church does not ADD or TAKE AWAY from the BIBLE. It is one of our standard works. In fact, every Sunday School lesson in 2006 will be about the Old Testament -- it's the theme for the year. Perhaps you can tell me how you beleive we "add or take away" from the bible and I will show you Biblical support for the LDS belief. I suspect, however, it will, once again, come down to interpretation.

dawny0826 said:
And with LDS...there's just so much to the religion that isn't Biblical. So much faith is put in the teachings of a man...a man, much like Russel who decided that he had the authority to change the bible to suit his fancy. I don't see honor in that...I can't. You don't need a separate book to instruct you how to live. The Bible is sufficient. HIS word is more than sufficient.
There is a different between a man and a prophet of God. Do you think the Bible magically appeared or was it written by men called by God to do an important work? Once again, show me what's non-Biblical in LDS teachings and I will show you otherwise.
 
Top