Vile Atheist
Loud and Obnoxious
Again, you think wages are a mere matter of legislation, rather than being set by the free market. To date that always ends in tears.
Do you not have minimum wage laws in your country?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Again, you think wages are a mere matter of legislation, rather than being set by the free market. To date that always ends in tears.
Yes, and unemployment benefits to cover the side-effect of that.Do you not have minimum wage laws in your country?
Yes, and unemployment benefits to cover the side-effect of that.
Which is apparently all you've given it. :yes:
Then why the provisions for slavery and not for murder?
we dont all value our lives so little as to spend our lives studying a book about a fictional hate filled ego-maniac.
Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world.
A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and
B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.
They are exactly there to condone slavery (at least from the nations around you). The bible states that you may buy slaves from there.
Any book that was truly from God
would not have been condoning slavery from the nations around you, and then saying to treat the slaves humanely. It would call for the abolition of slavery as one of the 10 commandments.
Instead of wasting time with something as stupid as "you must keep the sabbath holy" etc.
Um, no.
Yes, these are the ones breeding like rabbits, having children they can't afford, and then turning around and blaming the West who does nothing more than trade and provide aid.
And if there weren't so many people in the first place, it wouldn't.
America is not responsible for the 3rd world making a complete ****-up of their societies. This constant blaming of the innocent West is one of the things holding back actually solving the problem, because of misdirected blame.
Yes, for a man-made book, that's probably all you can expect. ie it's a man-made book, not from God.I just explained that.
Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world. I don't know if there was a single culture that forbade it. Considering that, a culture with a set of laws requiring humane treatment of slaves would probably be the closest thing to a progressive culture that anyone would have a right to hope to find from that period.
We aren't ignoring all the atrocities in human rights violations going on in our time. We have laws against that and a police force tasked with stopping them.We can look back, as I said, from our comfortable 21st century 1st world lives and shake our heads at the fact that they were even practicing slavery---in exactly the same way we can look down our noses at all the ancient people hacking each other to pieces with axes and swords---and feel smug and self-righteous about the fact that we're not doing any of that now.
but we can only do that if:
A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and
We can put ourselves in their place. And realise that if we were ignorant goat-herders like them, we'd probably have done the same thing. ie the bible was written by ignorant goat-herders, not God.B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.
I did answer it. Hopefully others noticed even if you can't give an honest comment about something easily verifiable."B" is why I asked one of the other people in this thread what they would have done about the slavery issue if he were a member of one of the Hebrew tribes in the year 1200 BCE. (and you'll notice, he didn't answer that).
Be an abolitionist, to the best of our ability.Putting ourselves in their place, even with our self-perceived sense of advanced and enlightened morality and civility, what would any of us done if we were to find ourselves a member of that time, place, and people?
We do honestly understand that the bible was written by ignorant goat-herders, not God.In order to be able to honestly answer that question a person would have to make an honest effort to understand the people, culture, conditions, and circumstances of those people. Anyone who isn't willing to do that isn't, IMO, entitled to an opinion about any of it (or at least an opinion that they should expect to be taken seriously).
Again, we perfecty understand what ignorant goat-herders got up to. It's you that is unable to even accurately comment on easily verifiable data that happened an hour ago, nevermind 2000 years ago.If we're going to compare ourselves to anybody, it's on us to make an honest effort to understand both parties.
But it has nothing to do with what a Hebrew tribesman would do, it's all about what an omnipotent god did, allegedly provided a law for the humane treatment of slaves. Why not just flick a switch and make it impossible for anyone in the world to own a slave or be a slave.I just explained that.
Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world. I don't know if there was a single culture that forbade it. Considering that, a culture with a set of laws requiring humane treatment of slaves would probably be the closest thing to a progressive culture that anyone would have a right to hope to find from that period.
We can look back, as I said, from our comfortable 21st century 1st world lives and shake our heads at the fact that they were even practicing slavery---in exactly the same way we can look down our noses at all the ancient people hacking each other to pieces with axes and swords---and feel smug and self-righteous about the fact that we're not doing any of that now.
but we can only do that if:
A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and
B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.
"B" is why I asked one of the other people in this thread what they would have done about the slavery issue if he were a member of one of the Hebrew tribes in the year 1200 BCE. (and you'll notice, he didn't answer that).
Putting ourselves in their place, even with our self-perceived sense of advanced and enlightened morality and civility, what would any of us done if we were to find ourselves a member of that time, place, and people?
In order to be able to honestly answer that question a person would have to make an honest effort to understand the people, culture, conditions, and circumstances of those people. Anyone who isn't willing to do that isn't, IMO, entitled to an opinion about any of it (or at least an opinion that they should expect to be taken seriously).
If we're going to compare ourselves to anybody, it's on us to make an honest effort to understand both parties.
They do make enough to eat. If they didn't, they would be dead, and the alleged problem would have solved itself. They make enough to eat and more, which is how they manage to breed like rabbits.It is better for fewer people to be employed but make a living wage than for there to be almost no employment and everyone barely makes enough to eat, if that.
Capitalism is what allows people to drag themselves out of poverty, not legislated wages.Disposable income is what allows people to consume and ultimately create more jobs and drive the economy.
So was murder.
That's irrelevant. The fact that it still goes on today does not mean that it becomes uncondemnable.
I condemn it in the past and I condemn it in the present.
The fact that it may have been convenient and even widely-accepted in those days is irrelevant
The fact that it may have been convenient and even widely-accepted in those days is irrelevant as to whether or not we can condemn it.
It's still wrong.
But it has nothing to do with what a Hebrew tribesman would do, it's all about what an omnipotent god did, allegedly provided a law for the humane treatment of slaves. Why not just flick a switch and make it impossible for anyone in the world to own a slave or be a slave.
Capitalism is what allows people to drag themselves out of poverty, not legislated wages.
I'd much rather God came down and outlawed slavery.And if I were on the auction block, I would much rather go home wioth someone who was living under a set of laws to ensure my well being and fair treatment.
It was a point brought up in this thread.I don't think it is, except in the sense that I think everything else is too. Do you? If not, how is that relevant to this discussion?
Right. Most of us are, with our modern understanding.Well then obviously you're a much more enlightened and moral person than any of the ancients were. Congratulations. :yes:
Right. The authorization of slavery shows that it is clearly not the word of God, unless God is evil or some other similar explanation.OK, I think we get it: you're not a big fan of the Bible.
Very well compared to every alternative ever tried. Taiwan and South Korea are good examples of what can be achieved in a very short time.Yeah...how's that working out so far?
Yes, for a man-made book, that's probably all you can expect. ie it's a man-made book, not from God.
We aren't ignoring all the atrocities in human rights violations going on in our time. We have laws against that and a police force tasked with stopping them.
Compare that to legalized, allegedly God-ordained, slavery.
I did answer it. Hopefully others noticed even if you can't give an honest comment about something easily verifiable.
Be an abolitionist, to the best of our ability.
of an
We do honestly understand that the bible was written by ignorant goat-herders, not God.
Again, we perfecty understand what ignorant goat-herders got up to. It's you that is unable to even accurately comment on easily verifiable data that happened an hour ago, nevermind 2000 years ago.
kerravon said:I did answer it. Hopefully others noticed even if you can't give an honest comment about something easily verifiable.