• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does the god who supposedly created this world deserve to be worshipped?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vile Atheist

Loud and Obnoxious
Yes, and unemployment benefits to cover the side-effect of that.

It is better for fewer people to be employed but make a living wage than for there to be almost no employment and everyone barely makes enough to eat, if that. Disposable income is what allows people to consume and ultimately create more jobs and drive the economy.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
Then why the provisions for slavery and not for murder?

I just explained that.

Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world. I don't know if there was a single culture that forbade it. Considering that, a culture with a set of laws requiring humane treatment of slaves would probably be the closest thing to a progressive culture that anyone would have a right to hope to find from that period.

We can look back, as I said, from our comfortable 21st century 1st world lives and shake our heads at the fact that they were even practicing slavery---in exactly the same way we can look down our noses at all the ancient people hacking each other to pieces with axes and swords---and feel smug and self-righteous about the fact that we're not doing any of that now.

but we can only do that if:

A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and

B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.

"B" is why I asked one of the other people in this thread what they would have done about the slavery issue if he were a member of one of the Hebrew tribes in the year 1200 BCE. (and you'll notice, he didn't answer that).

Putting ourselves in their place, even with our self-perceived sense of advanced and enlightened morality and civility, what would any of us done if we were to find ourselves a member of that time, place, and people?

In order to be able to honestly answer that question a person would have to make an honest effort to understand the people, culture, conditions, and circumstances of those people. Anyone who isn't willing to do that isn't, IMO, entitled to an opinion about any of it (or at least an opinion that they should expect to be taken seriously).

If we're going to compare ourselves to anybody, it's on us to make an honest effort to understand both parties.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
we dont all value our lives so little as to spend our lives studying a book about a fictional hate filled ego-maniac.

then what makes you feel like you have a right to an opinion about it? :shrug:
 

Vile Atheist

Loud and Obnoxious
Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world.

So was murder.

A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and

That's irrelevant. The fact that it still goes on today does not mean that it becomes uncondemnable. I condemn it in the past and I condemn it in the present.

B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.

The fact that it may have been convenient and even widely-accepted in those days is irrelevant as to whether or not we can condemn it. It's still wrong.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
They are exactly there to condone slavery (at least from the nations around you). The bible states that you may buy slaves from there.

And if I were on the auction block, I would much rather go home wioth someone who was living under a set of laws to ensure my well being and fair treatment.

Any book that was truly from God

I don't think it is, except in the sense that I think everything else is too. Do you? If not, how is that relevant to this discussion?

would not have been condoning slavery from the nations around you, and then saying to treat the slaves humanely. It would call for the abolition of slavery as one of the 10 commandments.

Well then obviously you're a much more enlightened and moral person than any of the ancients were. Congratulations. :yes:

Instead of wasting time with something as stupid as "you must keep the sabbath holy" etc.

OK, I think we get it: you're not a big fan of the Bible.


Um, yes.
 

Wannabe Yogi

Well-Known Member

Yes, these are the ones breeding like rabbits, having children they can't afford, and then turning around and blaming the West who does nothing more than trade and provide aid.

When life expectancy is low the only retirement is kids. Most cultures this means a male child. They must have a lot so at least one male child will survive. So as living standards come up and women are providing education the numbers of births go down.

And if there weren't so many people in the first place, it wouldn't.

False read the site. I already disproved this argument.

America is not responsible for the 3rd world making a complete ****-up of their societies. This constant blaming of the innocent West is one of the things holding back actually solving the problem, because of misdirected blame.

No reason to get mad. I am capable of having a civilized conversation are you ?

The West is not so Innocent, much of the aid you talk about was given to 3 world tyrants during the cold war. These countries are a wash with debt. We over threw many legitimate states and put in petty tyrants. This is the past. We no longer engage in this type of thing, but the poor are still paying the price.

Also look at the over all system. Lets just look at one example. Every country must sell all their grain and food supplies to a big company like monsanto if they want to play on the worlds stage. If not it will not be registered in their GNP. Then they must buy it back at a much higher price. This hurts the poor in every country. It creates much higher prices.
 

kerravon

Anti-subjugator
I just explained that.

Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world. I don't know if there was a single culture that forbade it. Considering that, a culture with a set of laws requiring humane treatment of slaves would probably be the closest thing to a progressive culture that anyone would have a right to hope to find from that period.
Yes, for a man-made book, that's probably all you can expect. ie it's a man-made book, not from God.

We can look back, as I said, from our comfortable 21st century 1st world lives and shake our heads at the fact that they were even practicing slavery---in exactly the same way we can look down our noses at all the ancient people hacking each other to pieces with axes and swords---and feel smug and self-righteous about the fact that we're not doing any of that now.

but we can only do that if:

A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and
We aren't ignoring all the atrocities in human rights violations going on in our time. We have laws against that and a police force tasked with stopping them.

Compare that to legalized, allegedly God-ordained, slavery.

B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.
We can put ourselves in their place. And realise that if we were ignorant goat-herders like them, we'd probably have done the same thing. ie the bible was written by ignorant goat-herders, not God.

"B" is why I asked one of the other people in this thread what they would have done about the slavery issue if he were a member of one of the Hebrew tribes in the year 1200 BCE. (and you'll notice, he didn't answer that).
I did answer it. Hopefully others noticed even if you can't give an honest comment about something easily verifiable.

Putting ourselves in their place, even with our self-perceived sense of advanced and enlightened morality and civility, what would any of us done if we were to find ourselves a member of that time, place, and people?
Be an abolitionist, to the best of our ability.

In order to be able to honestly answer that question a person would have to make an honest effort to understand the people, culture, conditions, and circumstances of those people. Anyone who isn't willing to do that isn't, IMO, entitled to an opinion about any of it (or at least an opinion that they should expect to be taken seriously).
We do honestly understand that the bible was written by ignorant goat-herders, not God.

If we're going to compare ourselves to anybody, it's on us to make an honest effort to understand both parties.
Again, we perfecty understand what ignorant goat-herders got up to. It's you that is unable to even accurately comment on easily verifiable data that happened an hour ago, nevermind 2000 years ago.
 

fishy

Active Member
I just explained that.

Slavery was a fact of life in the ancient world. I don't know if there was a single culture that forbade it. Considering that, a culture with a set of laws requiring humane treatment of slaves would probably be the closest thing to a progressive culture that anyone would have a right to hope to find from that period.

We can look back, as I said, from our comfortable 21st century 1st world lives and shake our heads at the fact that they were even practicing slavery---in exactly the same way we can look down our noses at all the ancient people hacking each other to pieces with axes and swords---and feel smug and self-righteous about the fact that we're not doing any of that now.

but we can only do that if:

A. We completely ignore all the atrocities and human rights violations still going on in our own time, and

B. Flat out refuse to put ourselves in their place.

"B" is why I asked one of the other people in this thread what they would have done about the slavery issue if he were a member of one of the Hebrew tribes in the year 1200 BCE. (and you'll notice, he didn't answer that).

Putting ourselves in their place, even with our self-perceived sense of advanced and enlightened morality and civility, what would any of us done if we were to find ourselves a member of that time, place, and people?

In order to be able to honestly answer that question a person would have to make an honest effort to understand the people, culture, conditions, and circumstances of those people. Anyone who isn't willing to do that isn't, IMO, entitled to an opinion about any of it (or at least an opinion that they should expect to be taken seriously).

If we're going to compare ourselves to anybody, it's on us to make an honest effort to understand both parties.
But it has nothing to do with what a Hebrew tribesman would do, it's all about what an omnipotent god did, allegedly provided a law for the humane treatment of slaves. Why not just flick a switch and make it impossible for anyone in the world to own a slave or be a slave.
 

kerravon

Anti-subjugator
It is better for fewer people to be employed but make a living wage than for there to be almost no employment and everyone barely makes enough to eat, if that.
They do make enough to eat. If they didn't, they would be dead, and the alleged problem would have solved itself. They make enough to eat and more, which is how they manage to breed like rabbits.

Disposable income is what allows people to consume and ultimately create more jobs and drive the economy.
Capitalism is what allows people to drag themselves out of poverty, not legislated wages.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
So was murder.

Uh huh. but even back then murder was recognized as something that ran counter to the interests of the society. Slavery wasn't seen that way.

Do you think that the laws that showed up in the Old Testament were put there solely because someone thought they were philosophically moral?

They were put there for the purposes of regulating a society.

Slavery, in that time and place, wasn't seen as counter to the interests of that society.

That's irrelevant. The fact that it still goes on today does not mean that it becomes uncondemnable.

No, but it does mean that we're being a bit hypocritical by pointing to a fault in someone else when we have the same fault.

I condemn it in the past and I condemn it in the present.

You can't do anything about the past. Pointing at a society that no longer exists and going "For shame" doesn't accomplish anything other than making ourselves feel superior.

The fact that it may have been convenient and even widely-accepted in those days is irrelevant

There's a difference between "convenient " and necessary. Also a difference between "universally practiced" and "widely accepted".

It was a fact of life in that time and place. They aren't morally accountable for it because they didn't see it as immoral.

The fact that it may have been convenient and even widely-accepted in those days is irrelevant as to whether or not we can condemn it.

Of course. We can condemn anything. All you have to do is point a finger at it.

It's still wrong.

Writing our own book of absolute moral truisms are we? In that case, I retract my recommendation that you ever try to put yourself in anyone else's place. That would just get in your way.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
But it has nothing to do with what a Hebrew tribesman would do, it's all about what an omnipotent god did, allegedly provided a law for the humane treatment of slaves. Why not just flick a switch and make it impossible for anyone in the world to own a slave or be a slave.

If you consider the Old Testament Laws the word of God, or expect me to, then there's no way we're going to be able to have a conversation about any of this.
 

kerravon

Anti-subjugator
And if I were on the auction block, I would much rather go home wioth someone who was living under a set of laws to ensure my well being and fair treatment.
I'd much rather God came down and outlawed slavery.

I don't think it is, except in the sense that I think everything else is too. Do you? If not, how is that relevant to this discussion?
It was a point brought up in this thread.

Well then obviously you're a much more enlightened and moral person than any of the ancients were. Congratulations. :yes:
Right. Most of us are, with our modern understanding.

OK, I think we get it: you're not a big fan of the Bible.
Right. The authorization of slavery shows that it is clearly not the word of God, unless God is evil or some other similar explanation.

In actual fact, I'm in the "similar explanation" camp.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes, for a man-made book, that's probably all you can expect. ie it's a man-made book, not from God.

Didn't realize that's what we were arguing about. I could have saved you some time.

We aren't ignoring all the atrocities in human rights violations going on in our time. We have laws against that and a police force tasked with stopping them.

Compare that to legalized, allegedly God-ordained, slavery.

Already did. you ignored most of what I had to say there.

I did answer it. Hopefully others noticed even if you can't give an honest comment about something easily verifiable.

I must have missed it then. Usually in these circumstances the considerate thing to do is to copy the post number so the other person can access it without having to search for it.

Since you didn't, I'l go look again.

Be an abolitionist, to the best of our ability.

So you'd be running around the camps of the ancient Hebrew tribes telling everyone to free their slaves?

Like I said, obviously you're much more enlightened and moral than any of the ancients were. too bad for the slaves of that time that you were born so much later.

of an
We do honestly understand that the bible was written by ignorant goat-herders, not God.

*sigh*

Again, we perfecty understand what ignorant goat-herders got up to. It's you that is unable to even accurately comment on easily verifiable data that happened an hour ago, nevermind 2000 years ago.

Like I said, I'll go look. I would certainly hate to miss any of your posts. :rolleyes:
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
kerravon said:
I did answer it. Hopefully others noticed even if you can't give an honest comment about something easily verifiable.

Ok, I looked, I can't find it (you have a lot of posts in this thread). Want to give me a clue? Or would you just rather call me a liar again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top