God is love
Active Member
People might think that a myth was established to explain this anomaly, Oddity.
Perhapps it is a sign of a divine creator.
The theory of the "Big Bang" creates it's own question. What created the Big Bang?
I heard "heavy particles comming together"
Perhapps but these particles would have to already exist before they became matter.
To be particules of any sort, they would have to be, at least, refined matter.
Then matter of some sort already existed instead of nothing. How can anything develope from nothing. Nothing comes from nothing.
There has to be a cause and effect relationship.
People might say, "How could God exist before He created?"
If there was refined matter already existing, He could organize the particles and combine them such that they made substances such as water, soils, birds, fish, mammals, man and woman.
Some would say, "How did God create himself, a body for himself?" or another question might be "How did He create a body for Adam before His own?"
He probably created a body for Himself before He created a body for Adam.
Next question "How could He create a body without a body?"
That sounds a bit like the Big Bang theory in a way, heavy particles comming together automatically. In other words particles moving themselves, bringing themseves together in such a way that they produce {create} something.
Perhapps a supreme being was capable of doing this, bringing particles of refined matter together to make a body and other bodies, to create a world on which to place these bodies, designing them with the ability to create others, programming them to physically develope into adults and programming them with instincts such as the maternal instinct to care for the young that are developing, the instinct of self preservation {survival mode} etc.
Perhapps God was amongst refined matter and developed intelligence to create with refined matter.
Some people who believe in evolution believe it it possible that man evolved from a fish or lesser organisms.
If it is possible for man to evolve from a fish, it seems it would be possinle for intelligence to develope from spirit matter and develope Supreme intelligence.
I read that the 'materialist" or "mechanist" view is that all life and spirit are made of nothing but matter and that their existence is dependent upon inanimate matter.
I believe it is made of more than physical matter and that creates intelligence.
If life could be made from nonlife then the term nonlife would be an inaccurate term.
Humans have created with materials on earth and created their own materieals, plastic for example. They have designed the microchip that's programmed to receive and process information. Humans have made things with moveable parts that work in combination or independent of eachother. They have made complex things and now cloning, making bodies and altering D.N.A. to make their own design of living creations.
Humans are doing now what a Supreme Being may have already done.
It isn't impossible to imagine or believe A Supreme Being would have had the same capability of organizing matter and creating with it usefull things and animals and human beings.
Humans have developed wisdom through the centuries as a Supreme Being has done through thousands maybe millions of years or light years.
When I think of the big bang theory, I wonder how anything that explodes reconstructs itself or creates order in disorder. For example, if any building exploded as a result of a terrorist attack such as a library, how could the pieces flying up in the air come together organized as they were with the books on the shelves in their proper sections in alphabetical order?
Scientists such as Einstein and others agree with Creationists that the universe had a definite beginning.
The question is what or who was the prime mover?
Perhapps the Supreme Being made the big bang.
Why does a theory have to be either Creation or Big Bang? Why do we have to believe either one or the other instead of combining the two with the thought that a Supreme Being caused the Big Bang?
In the movie "Inherit the Wind" which was about evolution verses creation being taught in school. The theory was posed that maybe God created man through an evolutionary process. I am not saying that I agree with this but at least God wasn't removed from the equation.
New Testement 2 peter 3:8 "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day." It is possible that more time was involved in the creation than 7 days. It is possible that it was 7 thousand years.
Perhapps it is a sign of a divine creator.
The theory of the "Big Bang" creates it's own question. What created the Big Bang?
I heard "heavy particles comming together"
Perhapps but these particles would have to already exist before they became matter.
To be particules of any sort, they would have to be, at least, refined matter.
Then matter of some sort already existed instead of nothing. How can anything develope from nothing. Nothing comes from nothing.
There has to be a cause and effect relationship.
People might say, "How could God exist before He created?"
If there was refined matter already existing, He could organize the particles and combine them such that they made substances such as water, soils, birds, fish, mammals, man and woman.
Some would say, "How did God create himself, a body for himself?" or another question might be "How did He create a body for Adam before His own?"
He probably created a body for Himself before He created a body for Adam.
Next question "How could He create a body without a body?"
That sounds a bit like the Big Bang theory in a way, heavy particles comming together automatically. In other words particles moving themselves, bringing themseves together in such a way that they produce {create} something.
Perhapps a supreme being was capable of doing this, bringing particles of refined matter together to make a body and other bodies, to create a world on which to place these bodies, designing them with the ability to create others, programming them to physically develope into adults and programming them with instincts such as the maternal instinct to care for the young that are developing, the instinct of self preservation {survival mode} etc.
Perhapps God was amongst refined matter and developed intelligence to create with refined matter.
Some people who believe in evolution believe it it possible that man evolved from a fish or lesser organisms.
If it is possible for man to evolve from a fish, it seems it would be possinle for intelligence to develope from spirit matter and develope Supreme intelligence.
I read that the 'materialist" or "mechanist" view is that all life and spirit are made of nothing but matter and that their existence is dependent upon inanimate matter.
I believe it is made of more than physical matter and that creates intelligence.
If life could be made from nonlife then the term nonlife would be an inaccurate term.
Humans have created with materials on earth and created their own materieals, plastic for example. They have designed the microchip that's programmed to receive and process information. Humans have made things with moveable parts that work in combination or independent of eachother. They have made complex things and now cloning, making bodies and altering D.N.A. to make their own design of living creations.
Humans are doing now what a Supreme Being may have already done.
It isn't impossible to imagine or believe A Supreme Being would have had the same capability of organizing matter and creating with it usefull things and animals and human beings.
Humans have developed wisdom through the centuries as a Supreme Being has done through thousands maybe millions of years or light years.
When I think of the big bang theory, I wonder how anything that explodes reconstructs itself or creates order in disorder. For example, if any building exploded as a result of a terrorist attack such as a library, how could the pieces flying up in the air come together organized as they were with the books on the shelves in their proper sections in alphabetical order?
Scientists such as Einstein and others agree with Creationists that the universe had a definite beginning.
The question is what or who was the prime mover?
Perhapps the Supreme Being made the big bang.
Why does a theory have to be either Creation or Big Bang? Why do we have to believe either one or the other instead of combining the two with the thought that a Supreme Being caused the Big Bang?
In the movie "Inherit the Wind" which was about evolution verses creation being taught in school. The theory was posed that maybe God created man through an evolutionary process. I am not saying that I agree with this but at least God wasn't removed from the equation.
New Testement 2 peter 3:8 "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day." It is possible that more time was involved in the creation than 7 days. It is possible that it was 7 thousand years.
