waitasec
Veteran Member
The only difference is,
YOU are not delivered
and
JungleJ didn't get the kind of deliverance he had in mind.
(ie, he wasn't delivered either)
exactly right...
we are still here..
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The only difference is,
YOU are not delivered
and
JungleJ didn't get the kind of deliverance he had in mind.
(ie, he wasn't delivered either)
exactly right...
we are still here..
Kathryn's right though.
We each make our own beds.
It truly is pointless to feel 'sorry'... or even sad,
for someone who chooses a love affair with garbage,
or a life in a decrepit ivory tower prison.
Hmm. Should we feel sorry for those who claim to be miserable but also claim there's nothing they can do about it?
Feel sorry for them, I don't know,
give them a hand up,
is nice.
Many people just need a hand up.
Or even just a hand
getting to a hand up.
Patience is required in certain situations as well.
It can take time rearranging things.
I feel as if that was a personal slight at me.
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't,
but it's ok.
It's not a personal slight to you. I'm asking a legitimate question - should we feel sorry for people whose choices have landed them in an unhappy situation and who are now miserable?
When I said, "We all make our own beds" I didn't mean that those who choose to stay in the bed they made are doing so out of spiritual pride or some idyllic ivory tower mentality, but that's the twist you put on it, and then you said we shouldn't feel sorry for them because of those attitudes. That's why I asked if we should feel sorry for those claiming to be miserable but also claiming they can't do anything about being miserable.
For the record, I DO feel empathy for people who feel stuck and frustrated and sad, in spite of the fact that often they feel that way because of choices they've made and continue to make. It's sad that they are unhappy, feel trapped, unfulfilled, etc. I encourage them to make changes in either their life or their attitude in order to find peace and joy.
Apparently while you were responding, I was editing my post to include the example of my parents' 50 year marriage, which has been full of frustration, anger, miscommunication, "stand offs," and emotional baggage. Please read that section of my post and perhaps that will clarify my point.
A person who has an accident which leaves them with a permanent disability still has the choice to either become bitter and angry and emotionally frustrated for the rest of their life, or they can choose to push through that frustration and anger and find peace and regain their joy. It's a challenge, and we wouldn't blame them for being frustrated or angry, but even so, their life would be better if they were able to overcome those negative emotions and live life positively and joyfully in spite of their limitations, right? I would be empathetic for them regardless of their attitude - but I would definitely find a positive, joyful attitude much more admirable. I wouldn't consider it to be self righteous.
I have seen, more than once, the claim that the only grounds for divorce is adultery. Of course, I completely disagree with that belief. Luckily my religion and my own ethics and morals don't limit the grounds for divorce to just that one thing.
So, what are reasonable grounds for divorce to you? To your religion (or lack thereof)? Why are those appropriate? Do you expect that others should live by those standards as well and why should they?
my friend, shirley, was left by her husband five years ago, fleeing to another state. they are still married, but she hasn't seen or heard from him in five years. she doesn't even know if he is still alive, because he hides so well.
Have we come to this....Well, probably we have. Should most if not all of this not have been covered in "courtship"? And now is never ten years down the line. What degrees of compromise were allowed for in these courses? My ex-wife and I would have passed these sort of tests yet we are divorced. My current partner and I would not, yet we are happy. I think that the idea of being honest with ourselves is just the experience we have gained from previous failure (because we did make our own bed and it is a failing if we made it wrong) and an understanding of what is important to ourselves and what is not. During this course, at what point would you have called a halt and said love is not enough?This go round, we were very planful, open, honest (with each other - and with OURSELVES - the most important form of honesty), and actually completed a pre-marriage course that really covered a lot of ground - questions about finances, future plans, retirement, holidays and vacations, religious beliefs and expectations, household chores, expectations regarding sexuality and intimacy, affection, personal hygiene and even cluttering and organization skills.
What despair. Don't let it kill you, UV.And THIS Kathryn, is exactly why I am so very sad for people who stay in unhappy, mismatched relationships.
Everyone deserves a loving, vital, well matched relationship such as your own, and IMO,
anything that gets in the way needs to be re'arranged, in order to make that happen.
If something in your mind had made you stay in your old marriage,
you would not have the happy life you have today.
I really cannot understand why you of all people,
are so defensive of unhappy partnerships.
My own marriage is killing me.
I HATE these stupid contractual documents that are holding me prisoner to a life I cannot stand.
Both the marriage and the house.
I WANT the hell out, and it's so freiking HARD TO DO.
Not even because there is disagreement over the divorce itself,
which really there isn't,
but because of all these damned legalities, and lack of money.
I weep for mySelf.
I weep for all of us who lack the well matched, loving and dynamic intimate life companionship we deserve, and need-- as human beings.
I weep for all of us who cannot find a way to get out of our lesser relationships. For WHATEVER reason.
Love over Legalities is what I'm talking about. And if that makes me somehow judgemental, so be it.
she says that she can't afford a lawyer to divorce him, even though she hasn't seen or heard from him in five years. she is medically disabled.She should probably divorce him. It's more complicated if the spouse isn't around, but not impossible. But she needs to protect herself - she may be liable for his debts or some of his activities if she doesn't separate herself legally from him.
In my opinion (and I'll expect you'll be surprised at this), I could -personally- never actually divorce my wife. Having made a covenant, in church, to look and care for her " 'til death us do part" -throough good times, and the bad times. But I would stillk have the same attitude if I discounted my religious beliefs - I tend to take things very literally. To me, marriage is a lifetime "contract" to work at, through thick and thin, no matter at what personal cost - but I think most people will find that hard to believe. But I know that I am a "strange" person; as someone who suffers from asperger's, I do take everything in life very literally.............
she says that she can't afford a lawyer to divorce him, even though she hasn't seen or heard from him in five years. she is medically disabled.