• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is the Bible the absolute, infallible, Word of God?

Is the Bible the absolute, infallible, Word of God?

  • Absolutely!

    Votes: 6 22.2%
  • No!

    Votes: 18 66.7%
  • I don't know

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Yes, but not the only

    Votes: 2 7.4%

  • Total voters
    27

jonny

Well-Known Member
Sanctified_by_Faith said:
THE HOLY BIBLE
The versions are just translated differently but it still is the same thing!!
I disagree. Take this scripture for example:

KJV - Job 19:26 - And though afer my skim worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh I shall see God:

BBE - Job 19:26 - And ... without my flesh I will see God;

Just a little different.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Sanctified_by_Faith said:
THE HOLY BIBLE
The versions are just translated differently but it still is the same thing!!
Actually, the different versions sometimes represent the translation of different textual families. For example, the King James Version (KJV) is a translation of the Textus Receptus, which came from Jerome's compilation that birthed the Latin Vulgate. The New International Version is a translation of an entirely different compilation of New Testament manuscipts collected and prioritized by scholars who held to a different textual theory.

There are 5,000 Greek manuscripts (MSS) of the NT, and no two of them are the same. There are another 10,000 Latin, Coptic, and Syraic manuscripts dating from the third century to the 17th century that are also considered. The MSS of the KJV is a translation of only ONE of the Greek codexes (of the 5,000 available), and it was by no means the earliest, and Jerome had to fill in many gaps with words from Latin versions. The NIV is loosely based on the USB4 (United Bible Society Greek NT, 4th ed) with priority given to other MSS from time to time as the interpreters and translators were convinced of the reliability of other MSS. Some tranlsations are based in the Nestle-Alland texts, and there are 27 editions of this collection today, and there are many other translations of different Greek versions.

So no, they are by no means translations of the same thing.
 
michel said:
I agree; the only way that the Bible might have been infallible would have been if God himself had written it (Or Jesus Christ).;)
He did he just used man because we are suppose to be willing vessels unto God meaning that we will do what God wants us to do when he says!! Thats what they did!!They let God use them to write the books for the Bible!! You should know that considering the fact that you claim to be a Christian! Dont you read the Bible? Read 2 Timothy 3:16 and 2 Peter 1:20-21 If you truely are a Christian then you should believe in the word of God and what the Bible says!! Because how then do you believe in Jesus and salvation if you dont think the word of God is infallible then how do you know that what the Bible says about salvation is true or not? In your way of thinking the ones who wrote the Bible could have messed up so what if they messed up with the plan of salvation through Christ?
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
Sanctified_by_Faith said:
He did he just used man because we are suppose to be willing vessels unto God meaning that we will do what God wants us to do when he says!! Thats what they did!!They let God use them to write the books for the Bible!! You should know that considering the fact that you claim to be a Christian! Dont you read the Bible? Read 2 Timothy 3:16 and 2 Peter 1:20-21 If you truely are a Christian then you should believe in the word of God and what the Bible says!! Because how then do you believe in Jesus and salvation if you dont think the word of God is infallible then how do you know that what the Bible says about salvation is true or not? In your way of thinking the ones who wrote the Bible could have messed up so what if they messed up with the plan of salvation through Christ?
If the Bible is absolute and infallible why are so many christian denomonations able to interpret the same book to mean many different things?
 
jonny said:
Take the example of Paul's vision. He wrote the same story three times and every time the details were different. In one account Saul was the only one to fall to the earth. In another everyone traveling with him fell to the earth. In one account they all heard the voice. In another account they didn't hear the voice. It's not important, but it shows that the Bible isn't perfect.
Show me some evidence for that statement. (What Scriptures?)
 
BruceDLimber said:
As a Baha'i, I would say that the Bible is most definitely the word of God, and that although it has suffered certain alterations and corruptions over time, these fortunately have not diminished its spiritual message to date!
Where do you get that? Little history lesson, when the OT was copied by Jews and one single error was found the whole thing was burned! If you don't believe me, do some accurate research.
 
Scott1 said:
... the problem is, that these same men who were "inspired" to define the Canon of Scripture were also called "cannibals" because they believed Communion to be the actual body and blood of Christ.
Actually that was a teaching by Luther. Which happen to have been a couple hundred years after the councils in the 300's and 400's! This was not taught by Jesus or the 12 apostles.
 
If the Bible is absolute and infallible why are so many christian denomonations able to interpret the same book to mean many different things?
Well, what does that have to do with the Bible being infallible?! How people interpret the Bible has nothing to do with it being infallible.

- David
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
JesusIsTheWay said:
Show me some evidence for that statement. (What Scriptures?)
Do you really think I would lie about that? :) Here are the scriptures:

Acts 9:3-4,7 -> And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And the men which journeyed stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.

Acts 22:6-7,9 -> And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light around me. And I fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake unto me.

Acts 26:13-14 -> At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round aboutme and them which journeyed with me. And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice saying unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tounge, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
JesusIsTheWay said:
Well, what does that have to do with the Bible being infallible?! How people interpret the Bible has nothing to do with it being infallible.

- David
Infallible means that it is incapable of failure or error. The fact that it has failed to keep Christians united is a failure in my opinion.
 

Aqualung

Tasty
JesusIsTheWay said:
Actually that was a teaching by Luther. Which happen to have been a couple hundred years after the councils in the 300's and 400's! This was not taught by Jesus or the 12 apostles.
Actually, people called christians cannibals very shorlty after there were christians in the first place. Taht's one of the oldest criticisms of a christian.
 
jonny said:
Do you really think I would lie about that? :) Here are the scriptures:

Acts 9:3-4,7 -> And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And the men which journeyed stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.

Acts 22:6-7,9 -> And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light around me. And I fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake unto me.

Acts 26:13-14 -> At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round aboutme and them which journeyed with me. And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice saying unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tounge, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Never said you would lie... wanted to look it up myself... The KJV (I'm assuming your using that) did not have the understanding of Greek, Hebrew, and such (I know the NT wasn't written in Hebrew) that we do today. And some of the words don't have the same meaning now as they did. So here is the NIV version:

Acts 9:3-4,7-8 As he neared Damascus on his jouney, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?"... The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand to Damascus.

Acts 22:6-7,9,11 About noon as I came near Damascus, suddenly a bright light from heaven flashed around me. I fell to the ground and heard a voice say to me, "Saul! Saul! Why do you persecute Me?" ... My companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him who was speaking to me... My companions led me by the hand into Damascus, because the brilliance of the light had blinded me.

Acts 26:13-14 About noon, O king, as I was on the road, I saw a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, blazing around me and my companions. We all fell to the ground and I heard a voice saying to me in Aramaic, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? It is hard for you tokick against the goads."

heard the sound. Those with Saul "heard the sound" but "did not understand" what the voice was saying (22:9).

we all fell to the ground. When "we" would also include Saul.

Just because there is no mention of "we" in the first two accounts, doesn't mean the Bible is wrong. He is telling a little bit more detail to King Agrippa in the Acts 26 account if you read it all. The rest is basicly a shorter version, just as you might tell a shorter version of something that happened to you after telling it a lot of times. He is just revealing different parts of the story at different times. "We all fell to the ground" and "The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless" are the only things that are the least bit contradictory. I will research it further and thank you for pointing that out. Any other examples?

- David
 

greatcalgarian

Well-Known Member
michel said:
I agree; the only way that the Bible might have been infallible would have been if God himself had written it (Or Jesus Christ).;)
There is another thread that questioned whether Jesus can read or write:banghead3 , and why not a single word was written down by him, and only orally transmitted and later after tens or one or two hundred years then only written down as the four gospels. :D

The only words God has written is perhaps those two tablets that Moses first received from Him, and in anger broke them, and hence nothing from that encountered has been left behind.

Then Jesus also wrote something on the sand, but those were not preserved.

So, it is pretty difficult if you want to find the actual written word by Christian God(s) in the form of the holy scripture.
 

greatcalgarian

Well-Known Member
This subject has been debated many times before, we may be re-inventing the wheels....

For example:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/emmett_fields/word_of_god_debate.html
or
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/
or
http://members.aol.com/ckbloomfld/

Which Bible?
The Holy Bible

There will be no common ground or understanding for any debate. Because we do not know which 'Holy Bible' now, we have to see whether it is the Jewish bible, the first OT completed in around BC 600, or the OT+NT of the Christian around AD 400, the Greek version, the Latin version, the Catholic version, the Orthodox version, the Lutheran version etc.

Let us agreed with the definition of Bible first, before we proceed to discuss whether that is the infallible word from God.

If not we shall be going around in circles.
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
#1 on my list - I don't believe that all the translations of the Bible are 100% correct.
 

Deut 13:1

Well-Known Member
jonny said:
#1 on my list - I don't believe that all the translations of the Bible are 100% correct.
Do you believe the Hebrew is the word of G-d? The Torah? Prophets? Writings?
 

Deut 13:1

Well-Known Member
JesusIsTheWay said:
Thats really a whole different debate... But I'm specificly talking about the originals.
JesusIsTheWay said:
Your contradicting yourself here. Since the Bible or any other document that "claims" to be inspired is written by imperfect humans, how can anything really be inspired? How could anybody really recieve a "revelation from God" if they will just mess it up? Is the Bible written by God? How do we know what they are writting is truly "inspired"?
Do you read the original Hebrew? If no, then who are you to tell him he's contradicting himself.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
greatcalgarian said:
This subject has been debated many times before, we may be re-inventing the wheels....

For example:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/emmett_fields/word_of_god_debate.html
or
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/
or
http://members.aol.com/ckbloomfld/

Which Bible?
The Holy Bible

There will be no common ground or understanding for any debate. Because we do not know which 'Holy Bible' now, we have to see whether it is the Jewish bible, the first OT completed in around BC 600, or the OT+NT of the Christian around AD 400, the Greek version, the Latin version, the Catholic version, the Orthodox version, the Lutheran version etc.

Let us agreed with the definition of Bible first, before we proceed to discuss whether that is the infallible word from God.

If not we shall be going around in circles.
Good point; but i doubt you will even manage to achive that small step.;)
 
Top