• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I need some help, please

Status
Not open for further replies.

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
Victor said:
I say this with much respect and charity Michel. Ever consider that emotions is what is clouding you up?

~Victor
I know exactly what you mean, and I cannot deny that part of it is emotion - Love and non judgementalism for another human being. I know that 'God works in mysterious ways', but I cannot (could not) visualize a Loving God denying a section of humanity a sense of fulfillment in a loving relationship by deniying them the physical demonstration of their love.:help:
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
michel said:
I know exactly what you mean, and I cannot deny that part of it is emotion - Love and non judgementalism for another human being. I know that 'God works in mysterious ways', but I cannot (could not) visualize a Loving God denying a section of humanity a sense of fulfillment in a loving relationship by deniying them the physical demonstration of their love.:help:
But can't you see how random and subjective feelings are? Where will you stop? How is that any different then lets say an adult an child who Love each other? Is there Love not worthy? I know you hate that I use that as an example but what's the difference but maturity and intelligence (In which Love does not play a role in).

~Victor
 

Fluffy

A fool
My beliefs have all the basics of Christianity - but leave out those parts that I think of as being un-Christian (For example - The 'homosexual' problem) - That is what has been eating away at me lately, amongst other lesser points.
The homosexual problem is what drove me from Christianity in the first place. However, it is possible to interpret the passages of the Bible that people feel condemn homosexuality, as not condeming homosexuality. It seems rational to me that the people who translated and interpreted the Bible originally, did not like gay people and so translated and interpreted these passages accordingly. Had this not been the case, the homosexual problem would not exist.

Therefore, I would urge you to read arguments for and against interpretations of passages that cause you problems. You may find that, in your opinion, the arguments that absolve homosexuality are stronger which in turn solves your problem at least in this case. On the other hand, you might find that the opposite happens but then this might still solve your problem by confirming your faith.

One of the other points I have a problem with is the Bible itself - mainly the old testament. To accept the old testament 'as is' in a totally literal sense to me, is an impossible task - timelines are adrift, I cannot accept ID and revoke evolution - that type of 'difference'. Again, I find it hard to say "I accept the New testament but not the old testament' - it feels wrong to do so.
Remember that the Bible is merely a collection of books that are pretty much unrelated (from author to author) beyond the fact that the early Church decided to bind them together into one big book. Jesus never mentions the Bible (he couldn't). The Bible never mentions the Bible (it can't). The only reason you have for feeling uneasy about rejecting some bits and accepting others is if you believe that the reasoning of these men was totally correct. That their exclusion of some texts and inclusion of others was the work of God and not for any other reason.

If you reject such a belief, then choosing which bits to accept and reject becomes harder but it does give you more freedom. I would at least find out why the books of the Bible are in the Bible and why the books that didn't make it, were excluded.
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
Victor said:
But can't you see how random and subjective feelings are? Where will you stop? How is that any different then lets say an adult an child who Love each other? Is there Love not worthy? I know you hate that I use that as an example but what's the difference but maturity and intelligence (In which Love does not play a role in).

~Victor
i'm sorry michel, this thread is to help you, but i can't let this slide unchallenged - the two cases are unbelievably different, you cannot heep sexual morality into one simple basket of "sex in hetrosexual marriage is right, all else is wrong"

maturity and inteligence distinguish between different types of love, thats the role they have in "love"

i love my mum, my brother, and my best friend - but it is my intelligence and maturity that distinguish between what this love means.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
corrupt_priest said:
i'm sorry michel, this thread is to help you, but i can't let this slide unchallenged - the two cases are unbelievably different, you cannot heep sexual morality into one simple basket of "sex in hetrosexual marriage is right, all else is wrong"

maturity and inteligence distinguish between different types of love, thats the role they have in "love"

i love my mum, my brother, and my best friend - but it is my intelligence and maturity that distinguish between what this love means.
You misunderstood me. I am not talking about a father/son type of love but an adult who actually loves a kid. Stance the same?

~Victor
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
Victor said:
You misunderstood me. I am not talking about a father/son type of love but an adult who actually loves a kid. Stance the same?

~Victor
kid not old enough or mature enough to committ to a sexual relationship with anyone, whereas two adult, loving homosexuals can - i see no comparison between the two cases :cool:

an adult who love a child:

well, i would have to say that an adult should understand that a child is not at the same level of inteligence or maturity to ask them to get involved in a sexual relationship, wheras two adult's can have that discussion
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
corrupt_priest said:
well, i would have to say that an adult should understand that a child is not at the same level of inteligence or maturity to ask them to get involved in a sexual relationship, wheras two adult's can have that discussion
CP, you were right the first time. This should be about Michel. Let's not get off topic. I do agree with you but that is an opinion with nothing heavy to really substiate it. The adult in love with a kid would think you are crazy.

~Victor
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
Victor said:
The adult in love with a kid would think you are crazy.
i doubt he'd be the only one :biglaugh: ..... or she for that matter

ok, back to helping our good friend

so......... the point being - you can hold a massively wide variety of views, and still be a follower of christ

we christians disagree on a lot of things, i mean, hello, we can't even agree on how many sacraments there are:eek:, let alone the significance of each of them! my advice, keep an open mind, ask questions, listen to answers, and see where you end up:jiggy:

C_P
 

Faint

Well-Known Member
Meesheltx said:
Faint...i agree with you. But I have found that it would be completely illogical to accept the bible in its entirity...there are too many contradictions. Of course, if one doesn't believe in logic...I guess they have no problems. But, I think if there is a God like the one described in the bible, he is all-knowing and would obviously know that humans would have to use logic eventually and would inevitably be forced to pick and choose from the bible in order to make sense of things. Maybe its another one of those "choices" the christian god is famous for...God is maybe hoping that people will make the right decisions that fit with their faith?
This is all hypothetical....I'm very much so not a Christian but thats my view on it.
Exactly. In my opinion it is illogical to accept the Bible in its entirety, and therefore, also illogical to accept any of it at all. Michel, like a lot of Christians, seems to be choosing only the parts that make sense to him, and I think that's at least better than also accepting the misogynistic parts. Whether or not this is cool with his God--I wouldn't know. Too bad God doesn't have a customer service number.
 

Dentonz

Member
scitsofreaky said:
Out of curiosity, does Jesus say to follow the "ten" commandments, or the commandments?
The ten commandments was the bases for the law of the jews.
Matthew 5:17-18 Jesus said "think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fulfill. For I say to you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
vs. 20 "that except your righteousness shall exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven."
The scribes and Pharisees represented the law of moses to the people at that time(the ten commandments). Jesus said you must follow these as well as any other commandment I give you as well. He goes on in the rest of this chapter to explain this a lot better than I can. So, you can read for yourself. All throughout the gospels Jesus gives his followers commandments they must follow. So in order to see the kingdom of heaven you must follow the fulfillment of the law (Jesus).
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
we christians disagree on a lot of things, i mean, hello, we can't even agree on how many sacraments there are:eek:, let alone the significance of each of them! my advice, keep an open mind, ask questions, listen to answers, and see where you end up:jiggy:
The very fact that we are forced to “render our private judgment” in favor of one of the thousands of competing Christian groups is a sad legacy of the Reformation. I do not believe it is a decision that God ever intended for us to have to make.

~Victor
 

Dentonz

Member
Faint said:
Too bad God doesn't have a customer service number.
Guess what? He does: prayer.
John 14:6 Jesus said, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man can come to the Father( God,Jehovah,Yahweh,Allah) but by me.

1st Tim 2:5 For there is but one God, and one mediator between God and men, Jesus Christ.
 

Faint

Well-Known Member
Dentonz said:
Guess what? He does: prayer.
John 14:6 Jesus said, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man can come to the Father( God,Jehovah,Yahweh,Allah) but by me.

1st Tim 2:5 For there is but one God, and one mediator between God and men, Jesus Christ.
Guess what? Sorry...that line is out of order. Please hang-up and try again...
Prayer? Please. That's like asking questions to a dial tone. Next you'll tell me that god has answered prayers, and then I'll have to ask for some evidence of this, which of course no one can provide. And then I'll have to explain how it wouldn't make sense anyway for god to listen to you because he would probably just continue do whatever he wanted anyway (since he already has some great plan right), and moreover, what if two people have opposing prayers--does god play favorites? And if so, that doesn't seem like a very just and loving god. So prayer? Let's not go there.
 

Dentonz

Member
corrupt_priest said:
i'm sorry michel, this thread is to help you, but i can't let this slide unchallenged - the two cases are unbelievably different, you cannot heep sexual morality into one simple basket of "sex in hetrosexual marriage is right, all else is wrong"
Why not? Even if a person is born gay that is something they have to work out between them and God. Everybody has some kind of sin in their life that they have to deal with.
Some people have a desire to mutilate animals and some grow in to serial killers. They were probably born that way. Some people can't speak without lying. Others are kleptomaniacs ( I know a girl in kindergarten that will steal anything she can get her hands on, she was probably born with that desire). And most people now days have pre-marital sex or enjoy pornography and the like. All of which are plainly listed as sins in any version of the bible I've ever seen. Which is why Jesus had to come and shed his blood for all of us, because we are all sinners and have to stand before God in judgment someday for our own actions. The difference is whether we've accepted Jesus' atonement for our sins or not.

Jesus loves and died for everyone regardless of their sin, or the degree of their sin.
This is not aimed at any person or people, it is aimed at sin.
I love you all, and may the grace and peace of our Lord be with you all.
 

Dentonz

Member
Faint said:
Guess what? Sorry...that line is out of order. Please hang-up and try again...
Prayer? Please. That's like asking questions to a dial tone. Next you'll tell me that god has answered prayers, and then I'll have to ask for some evidence of this, which of course no one can provide. And then I'll have to explain how it wouldn't make sense anyway for god to listen to you because he would probably just continue do whatever he wanted anyway (since he already has some great plan right), and moreover, what if two people have opposing prayers--does god play favorites? And if so, that doesn't seem like a very just and loving god. So prayer? Let's not go there.
Just earlier today I prayed that God would give me the chance to tell someone about his love. And here you are. Wow! God answers prayer.
And no it doesn't make any sense at all that the Allmighty would listen to little 'ol me, but he does. And he only answerers prayers that are prayed according to his will. What is God's will? You've got a whole book to study from and learn. The Bible.
 

Faint

Well-Known Member
Dentonz said:
Just earlier today I prayed that God would give me the chance to tell someone about his love. And here you are. Wow! God answers prayer.
You're right. That's really good evidence. I'm converted.

I'm also way off topic--apologies to Michel.
 

scitsofreaky

Active Member
Dentonz said:
The ten commandments was the bases for the law of the jews.
Matthew 5:17-18 Jesus said "think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fulfill. For I say to you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
vs. 20 "that except your righteousness shall exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven."
The scribes and Pharisees represented the law of moses to the people at that time(the ten commandments). Jesus said you must follow these as well as any other commandment I give you as well. He goes on in the rest of this chapter to explain this a lot better than I can. So, you can read for yourself. All throughout the gospels Jesus gives his followers commandments they must follow. So in order to see the kingdom of heaven you must follow the fulfillment of the law (Jesus).
Well here is the thing, christians think of the ten commandments as "the" commandments, but, as jewscout has just informed me, there are 613 commandments (although apparently 200 aren't applicable because there is no temple). Since it doesn't ever say specifically, why don't you (any christian) follow the 413 commandments?
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
michel said:
To me the message of Christianity is, at it's simplest:- follow the ten commandments, recognize that Jesus died so that our sins may be forgiven, believe in God, pledge my soul to him, try to live as sinless a life as is possible and Love and accept everyone as he/she is (Do not Judge).

There are beliefs I cannot, in conscience, subscribe to. Uppermost those about Homosexuality; that is the sticking point that is like a very sore thumb.

Can I continue to call myself a Christian ? Do I need to dissociate myself from Christianity because of the 'bits' I can't go along with ?
Okay, Michael, I'm feeling really stupid here. Obviously, you've posted your viewpoints on homosexuality on this forum before, but somehow I've missed those posts, so I'm really not sure what you're getting at here. But, whatever they are, I can't imagine your feeling that you can't continue to call yourself a Christian because you can't go along with every single solitary "Christian" teaching. To begin with, as you have pointed out, there are so many different "brands" of Christianity that if you agree with every point of doctrine that one denomination teaches, you will undoubtedly end up disagreeing with the teachings of a number of other denominations. By that reasoning, none of us could call ourselves Christians. I know I'm not going to stop calling myself a Christian just because I don't accept the doctrine of the Trinity! And that's a very basic doctrine where most Christians are concerned.

Your understanding of what it means to be a Christian is right on target, and you shouldn't let anybody ever tell you that you're not a Christian because of a difference of opinion on any point of doctrine. Have you ever stopped to consider the fact that the Bible is a whole lot more clear with respect to how a Christian must behave than it is on what a Christian must believe? Keep that foremost in your mind and you won't go wrong.

God bless,
Kathryn
 

Dentonz

Member
scitsofreaky said:
Well here is the thing, christians think of the ten commandments as "the" commandments, but, as jewscout has just informed me, there are 613 commandments (although apparently 200 aren't applicable because there is no temple). Since it doesn't ever say specifically, why don't you (any christian) follow the 413 commandments?
Jesus was talking to the scribes and Pharisees in Matt 15:7-9
you hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophecy of you, saying, this people draw near to me with their mouth and honour me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
But in vain they worshio me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
In other words they were making up their own rules and teaching them as commandments of God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top