• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Julian Assange - What's it about?

Troublemane

Well-Known Member
oh YEAH. without a doubt. A swedish authority person said on BBC the other day that if he was extradited to Sweden they would extradite him elsewhere, if anyone else wants him, wink wink.

Besides that, there is talk that Sweden never moves this quickly on ANYTHING. it is purportely quite a surprise how fast this moved through the courts. When asked why, a lawyer in the UK said it was "our big brother in the west". So, yeah, I think the US is putting pressure on Sweden to go after Assange, and then when he is in custody give him a stern water-boarding. :trampo:
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
It would be easier for the USA to extradite him from the UK.
However the arrangements we have, are so one sided in favour of the USA, that It creates a political stink every time they are used.
 

sandandfoam

Veteran Member
It would be easier for the USA to extradite him from the UK.
However the arrangements we have, are so one sided in favour of the USA, that It creates a political stink every time they are used.

I heard someone say on the radio this morning that what he's accused of is not illegal in the UK or Ireland and that what constitutes a sex crime in Sweden is far broader than here.

Sounds very fishy to me.
 

Diederick

Active Member
It really astounds me how European countries still feel like the USA has some great power over them and they need to abide every request that is made by it. Personally I think the US has much to learn from European countries, such as Sweden and Norway.

And on the issue, I think governments need to be far more transparent to their people. It goes without saying that tactical military data and personal information has to remain secret, but I don't believe such information was among the documents Assange made public. Frankly, I think he was doing the world a favour. The government shouldn't have anything to hide from its own people.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It really astounds me how European countries still feel like the USA has some great power over them and they need to abide every request that is made by it. Personally I think the US has much to learn from European countries, such as Sweden and Norway.
Promise Europe several hundred billion dollars, & some monkeys will jump thru some hoops.
News Headlines
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Yeah, didn't you hear? Amazon, MasterCard, Visa, PayPal, and Sweden are all in cahoots with the US.

Sweden has some law on the books that states that if a man has CONSENSUAL sex with a woman, but doesn't wear a condom, that's rape. I think that's a stretch. Assault, maybe, but not rape. But that's really beside the point.

To me, no pun intended, but the jury's still out on Assange. Personally, I think he's a real oddball, and he doesn't strike me as the stuff heroes are made of. Seems more like he gets off on some sense of power and mystery.

I think it's sort of funny, in a sad way, that he complained to his mother about not having internet access in jail - and that she put this out there as if it is a legitimate, and serious complaint. I think I'm starting to see where some of his oddities come from. But, hey, it's nice to see mom and son re connect after not communicating for years. Hell, the man doesn't even have an ADDRESS.

Something's rotten in Denmark. I mean Sweden.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Sweden has some law on the books that states that if a man has CONSENSUAL sex with a woman, but doesn't wear a condom, that's rape. I think that's a stretch. Assault, maybe, but not rape.
It is an interesting approach to law & justice....to make seemingly ordinary things be severely prosecutable. This gives a great deal
of power to government. Were you to do anything they don't like, then something will be found as a pretext to put you in the slammer.
Sounds like a great way to keep the populace in line without their being any the wiser.

To me, no pun intended, but the jury's still out on Assange. Personally, I think he's a real oddball, and he doesn't strike me as the stuff heroes are made of.
A hero is usually just some schlub who is in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Assange is the schlub de jour.

Seems more like he gets off on some sense of power and mystery.
Sounds like the kind of person who would tend to have his likeness carved into a statue or SD cliff side.
One person's hero is another's scoundrel. And even all heros have some warts somewhere.
 
Last edited:

Requia

Active Member
It would be easier for the USA to extradite him from the UK.
However the arrangements we have, are so one sided in favour of the USA, that It creates a political stink every time they are used.

Extradition from the UK to the US has been known to take years.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Is this extradition the Swedes are after ultimately about the US getting their hands on Assange?

The US has the little problem that Assange hasn't broken any laws, unless they want to claim that ALL investigative journalists are breaking the law.

Their objective is to erode wikileaks foundation of trust by smearing its administrators. It sure seems to have backfired.
 

sandandfoam

Veteran Member
The US has the little problem that Assange hasn't broken any laws, unless they want to claim that ALL investigative journalists are breaking the law.

Espionage seems to be the line.
I agree with you that it does seem to have backfired. I still wouldn't like to be him if they get their hands on him. A little matter like not having broken any laws won't be of much help I imagine.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Espionage seems to be the line.
I agree with you that it does seem to have backfired. I still wouldn't like to be him if they get their hands on him. A little matter like not having broken any laws won't be of much help I imagine.

Yes, the 1917 Espionage Act, which basically criminalizes dissent, is the only law that could possibly apply. The problem is, once they apply it to investigative journalists they are in danger of alienating news organizations, which is political suicide.
 

Requia

Active Member
The US has the little problem that Assange hasn't broken any laws, unless they want to claim that ALL investigative journalists are breaking the law.

Their objective is to erode wikileaks foundation of trust by smearing its administrators. It sure seems to have backfired.

Current theory is that Manning will be 'convinced' to testify that Assange talked him into it in exchange for ending the indefinite solitary detention he's currently facing.
 

dmgdnooc

Active Member
Another current theory is that Assange is not a journalist.
 
This has the major benefits of, supposedly, not offending any 'real' journalists who might be listening/watching and side-stepping potential disagreements regarding freedom of the press.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Another current theory is that Assange is not a journalist.
 
This has the major benefits of, supposedly, not offending any 'real' journalists who might be listening/watching and side-stepping potential disagreements regarding freedom of the press.

That's ludicrous. Why wouldn't he be a journalist?
 
Top