Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Either that, or there was an Eyewitness there that put it in writing, and now lives in your heart.Jensa said:It was in response to your "show me one scientist..." bit. You cannot prove it. Nobody can. Unless you go back in time with a camcorder, it cannot be proven, and no scientist in their right mind would say "yes, there is proof for that" when there is none.
Sure thing. How many people were killed in the name of science? How many genocides? How many wars?Created any atom bombs, lately? Gunpowder? Wanna compare body counts?
Except that he's unregenerate. Perhaps God has just not chosen to save him.Either that, or there was an Eyewitness there that put it in writing, and now lives in your heart.
It is truly beyond me how anyone, pro or con, could read such an argument and respect it.AV1611 said:Jesus walked on water, for example. Show me ONE scientists that denys that. Just ONE.
Or you're a fool - (Psalm 14:1) - or a reprobate (Titus 1:16).JerryL said:Or perhaps the problem is that he's a skeptic and you are delusional.
If it's "beyond you", and you really want to know, may I suggest you try to catch up?Deut. 32.8 said:It is truly beyond me how anyone, pro or con, could read such an argument and respect it.
Do you mean 'person who fears books' or 'person who fears the Bible'? Either way, I'm not sure if I understand it.AV1611 said:I love Scientists, Michel. I think every Bibliophobe should have their own personal one.
A scientist can't be a theist?FeathersinHair said:Scientists are not out to get theists. They have a curious nature, and a delightful one at that.
I'm sorry if my comment was interpreted that way. What I meant was to reassure you that scientists are not out to get theists. (I may have been wrong, but that was the impression I was getting that you had.)AV1611 said:A scientist can't be a theist?
Well, the unregenerate ones usually are.FeathersinHair said:I'm sorry if my comment was interpreted that way. What I meant was to reassure you that scientists are not out to get theists. (I may have been wrong, but that was the impression I was getting that you had.)
Well, I had looked 'theist' up on my online dictionary and it said:FeathersinHair said:Ahhhh... So by 'thiest' you mean "a very specific type of Christianity"?
So you wouldn't see people who subscribed to other faiths as theists?AV1611 said:Well, I had looked 'theist' up on my online dictionary and it said:
BELIEF IN THE EXISTENCT OF A GOD OR GODS, ESPECIALLY BELIEF IN A PERSONAL GOD AS CREATOR AND RULER OF THE WORLD.
That's the only definition it gave, and that's the definition I went with.
Wel-l-l-l-l, I'd hafta know what their writings say, and what they believe about it.FeathersinHair said:So you wouldn't see people who subscribed to other faiths as theists?
Are you then saying that anyone 'not supporting' Genesis is therefore attacking theisim? (The belief in a higher power.) Or are you saying something else?ANY scientist that says the Sun was created first, is not supporting Genesis 1.
I said that, didn't I?JerryL said:the - God
ist - conjugit of "ism"
ism - belief or movement
a thiest has a believe in a god or gods.
... trying to stay on topic but having no idea what the topic is