Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
rakhel said:Being born a daughter of Levi does not necessarily mean she was the original Levi's daughter. Her father may have also been named Levi.
Further, Being a daughter of Levi, is also a very nice short cut. My husband could say he is a son of Benjamin even though his father's name is David.
Saying you are the son or daughter of an ancestor identifies you with a particular clan.
Numbers 26:59 said:And the name of Amram's wife was Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt; and she bore unto Amram Aaron and Moses, and Miriam their sister.
Exodus 6:20 said:And Amram took him Jochebed his father's sister to wife; and she bore him Aaron and Moses. And the years of the life of Amram were a hundred and thirty and seven years.
I am not saying it is wrong. I am saying that maybe you are interpreting the word "daughter" too literally.
"The daughter of Levi, born to Levi" does not necessarily mean she is 2 generations from Jacob.
As I said, I was not arguing about whether or not the sum was logical. I was stating that your numbers are off. Being so, it does take away your credibility as you are using faulty information.The calculations that I offered are within acceptable ranges and more than account for the population figures mentioned in the book of Numbers.
 
If a population of 6 millions is possible then to have 600,000 certainly allows for deaths, immaturity and the like.
 
Do the sum, you will find that it is logically possible that Numbers is correct.
 
This is exactly what I am trying to say.And there's no reason to think that Jacob is literally the father of Levi, either. Levi might be just any random descendant of Jacob.
I mean Levi, the founding father of the Levites. Why should any familial relationship in the Bible be interpreted literally?This is exactly what I am trying to say.
"Of Levi" means Of the Levi clan.
"To Levi" means her father was named Levi
However, "in Egypt" Suggests this particular Levi is not the Levi that came to Egypt with Jacob but rather one that was already in Egypt.
This would be like saying daughter of Levi, born to Levi in England
I mean Levi, the founding father of the Levites. Why should any familial relationship in the Bible be interpreted literally?
That's the only way I can see of making sense of it without simply saying that the account we have cannot be true.Smoke, I am agreeing with you....I think.
I do think that Jacob is the father of a Levi. As in his wife gave birth tho a boy that they named Levi. But I don't think it is the same Levi whose daughter is Jocobed.
I agree and understand you that the relationship between one person and another may not always be taken literally, like in the bible. There are many case where people immediately related to David have become known as "son of David". I don't doubt such usage.rakhel said:I am not saying it is wrong. I am saying that maybe you are interpreting the word "daughter" too literally.
"The daughter of Levi, born to Levi" does not necessarily mean she is 2 generations from Jacob.