Yes, alienating the allies you so desperately need should work out great.
Nah...you should see the stuff we draw about jesus! Seriously, you wouldn't
believe how much
jesus porn i've seen.
Hot stuff.
Mostly gay.
Ok, fine. It's
all gay.
So, how would you selectively define which pages to ban and why?
I don't know. I'm not certain what
your criterium of selection was; this is
your proposition, after all.
Sure!
While cultural differences can and are so heavily ingrained in us, skin colour is only
skin deep (see what i did there? 'tink it's a pun)
Presently, it's a popular notion to not judge folk heavily based soley on racial differences, like, for expample:
-not taxing asians for being asians.
-pulling over blacks for being in expensive cars
-not allowing arabs to board planes.
The rage these days is to
try and judge people by their cultural and personal merits.
Overt racism is considered
not only harmful, but completely
without basis.
"racism: a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others. I.e
Deragotory depictions of Arab culture
Huh?
I'm sorry, square peg round hole.
And not one of those very stretchy holes, if-ya-know-what-i-mean
No, you don't. You support freedom of speech when it suites your needs.
Oh? My needs?
What is the difference between derogatory pages that focus on race and religion?
To be fair, i'm not certain at this point that you
know the difference between race and religion.
But hey! There's a south park episode
for that, too!
Why is there differing responses to these pages?
The fashion of the times that i'd mentioned above.
A picture that takes the race of the Prophet and uses that as a topic to ridicule i.e terrorism
...is not racism. Sorry.
I am not discussing how racist the page was. I am noting how differently facebook staff treated racist pages and the page in discussion.
Ahh...my mistake.
