• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Religion and the Soldier

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
EEWRED said:
See my previous post and you will see why Biblically I oppose this line of thought. See most of my post and you will see why I appose this line of reasoning. Soldier = _____(Fill in whatever adjective best describes a murderer that is worse than a mafia hit man) Nice.

Really? They are all brainwashed and don't really mean to do what they are doing? I think that you have seen to many sci-fi movies. But, okay, I'll go ahead and play along. The purpose of the military is to defend the nation. It does so by taking out the enemy. You do that by killing people (the bad people) and destroying things (the bad people's things). You make it sound as if there is a band of brainwashed mercs running around burning and killing anything in its way.

Yes, EEWRED, in a way they are brainwashed. That's the purpose of boot camp, to erase the normal reticence and situational analysis that keeps society peaceful but would be crippling on the battlefield. As far as the military's purpose, it is to project state power, to compel submission, usually for economic reasons. The US hasn't needed defense since 1812, and even then it was not just a war of defense, but a war of expansion -- into Florida, Canada, and Indian Territory. As far as "taking out the enemy," what makes these people my enemy? I never even met them and I have no beef with them. Are the > 100,000 Iraqi civilians killed in the past couple years "bad people?" How were the Vietnamese "the enemy?" France finally throws in the towel and the US jumps into an obscure country's civil war in an effort to suppress the results of a democratic election. Was that defending the US? And I won't embarrass you by asking how the present middle Eastern fiasco is defending us.



Where is this quote from? Or did you make it up like everything else in this post?

Yes, I made it up to illustrate a point. It is not inaccurate. Ask any soldier.



If you would like to start a thread that discusses the Christians responsibility to obey those that God has put in command, unless those commands oppose those of Christ, we certainly can. That is where this kind of belongs. The Christian is to obey those who have rule over us, unless it is over things that God condemns. That applies to the soldier as well. If you are commanded to do something that is in opposition to God's will, then you are not to do it.

I thought "the divine right of kings" was a historical curiosity. Apparently the concept is still alive and well.
In war you are routinely commanded to do that which God condemns. But as I mentioned previously, soldiers are psychologically conditioned not to Analyse every command; not to think back on last Sunday's sermon. Although the Military Code of Justice states that a soldier may refuse an unlawful command, soldiers are carefully conditioned not to question, not to analyse. It would create chaos on the battlefield. And the code says nothing of immoral commands. If you are commanded to do something in opposition to god's will you will be court marshalled for not doing it.


The military are peacemakers because they stop the warriors. (Of course depends on what military you are referring to.)

The military are a protection racket -- they create their own need. If they gave a war and nobody came, there would be no need for protection.


I have to stop at this point. I could keep getting angry at your hatred and go into a rant about how the "peacemakers" like to sit back, smoke pot, make love and decry the military, while young men and women sacrifice themselves because they want you to have that right, but, you have heard it all before and still are convinced that the military and the soldier is evil, so what's the point.

My hatred?! -- Words fail me....
The "young men and women sacrificing themselves," on both sides, are the sole threat to my freedom to sit back and smoke pot (and, FYI, despite my defense of pot on another thread, I do not, myself, use it).

I really hope that you will learn some compassion and love for the soldiers who defend you Seynori. Peace.
The soldiers are not defending me, EEWRED. The soldiers are projecting US influence. I am not threatened. And I do have compassion for those poor patsies lured into the rackets -- on both sides.
Do you think Jesus loves Iraqis less than He loves Americans? Do you think they are bad people? Should I love them less just because they are far, far away and speak a strange language I can't understand?

EERWRED, you are operating from a moral stage four. You need to learn that people, even lots of people (the state) cannot override universal moral principles, nor can they create their own. As a Christian your task on earth is not to serve whatever state you chance to be born in, but to grow a clean, shiny soul for God to harvest.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
OK, that turned out badly. Please note that my replies have somehow mixed themselves into EERWRED's quotation.

How do people manage to get multiple, seperated quotations into their posts? I'm obviously a formatting imbecile.
 

Voxton

·
Well, in the documentary "The Crusades," Terry Jones makes an excellent point: the knights served Jesus; the prince of peace; turn the other cheek, love your enemies, and treat others as you would like to be treated yourself... But then they were sent off commit murder and mayhem in Jesus' name -- it's a perfect recipe for schizophrenia.

Christianity and being a soldier is simply not compatible. Being a Christian soldier only becomes possible, if that Christian soldier is ignorant of his own faith. Which -- needless to say (or so I thought) -- is not uncommon...

This isn't due to any particularly pacifistic tendency in Christianity -- it is just due to the overall fallacy of most man-made creations. And Christianity is one of them. As are all religions, of course.
 

BUDDY

User of Aspercreme
Seyorni said:
The soldiers are not defending me, EEWRED. The soldiers are projecting US influence. I am not threatened. And I do have compassion for those poor patsies lured into the rackets -- on both sides.
Do you think Jesus loves Iraqis less than He loves Americans? Do you think they are bad people? Should I love them less just because they are far, far away and speak a strange language I can't understand?

EERWRED, you are operating from a moral stage four. You need to learn that people, even lots of people (the state) cannot override universal moral principles, nor can they create their own. As a Christian your task on earth is not to serve whatever state you chance to be born in, but to grow a clean, shiny soul for God to harvest.
Yes, they are defending you. You may not realize it, but we are threatened every day by people who mean to harm us. It is a fact, trust me. People you will never hear about are making sure that innocent Americans are protected, you just don't see it. And while the US military is used to project US influence, that is not all it is used for. Not that I think that mission is a bad one. I don't think that calling us patsies is a great way to win influence or conveigh a point. You're hatred is more hurtful than you know.

As far as Jesus is concerned, I believe that he loves all people the same. But, what do Iraqis in general have to do with this discussion? Are we at war with all Iraqis? No. Are we at war with some Iraqi's? Yes, the ones who have decided to blow up themselves and as many innocent women and children as they can. I think that you are working under the impression, that because a soldier is in a country, with a gun, he is therefore at war with everyone he comes into contact with. You are wrong. Ignorance is bliss though, so go ahead and believe what you will.

BTW, plenty of "christians" have been banned for saying things like, "all heathens are going to hell." They are also condemned by the majority of people on this forum, including me, for their intolerance and hatred. Your description of soldiers as condemning themselves to hell is just as judgemental, intolerant and hateful. You might want to rethink how that would sound to someone and stop your hypocritical false judgement as well.

Now, back to the subject. Are there those out there who can give me a Biblical basis for the belief that Christians (and therefore all humanity) should not be in the military or perform a military service? Does this go for law enforcement as well? Since a police officer may be forced to shoot and kill someone? Does the Bible teach, as Seynori so gently put it, that the person who is a soldier, goes to hell? Any thoughts?
 

fromthe heart

Well-Known Member
Voxton said:
Christianity and being a soldier is simply not compatible. Being a Christian soldier only becomes possible, if that Christian soldier is ignorant of his own faith. Which -- needless to say (or so I thought) -- is not uncommon...
The Bible also says to obey the laws under which you live...I remember those who didn't accept being drafted in the 60"s and 70's some went to Canada;some used religious reasons....My husband did neither..he served his country with a prayer of guidence every day of his service..he came home after 18 months of service with 2 purple hearts from injuries he'd gotten in a battle that was not of his making...he was not ignorant of his faith...he just obeyed the laws made by those who governed the country...God was with him all the same. He was placed by his field of duty in engineering,after he had a duce and a half blown out from under him by a land mine and his legs were broken he healed; still continued his tour of duty...when he was shot he mended and finished his tour of duty. He kept his faith that God would bring him home and God did bring him home. He never HAD to shot anyone...God kept him from being in that position by allowing him to be wounded....perhaps it's not quite the thin line as you might think about serving GOD AND COUNTRY!:)
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Scott1 said:
When I was in the Military, I was an atheist.... now, as a Christian... I could never join... could never do the things I did in my "youth".

I don't know how any Christian could.
I agree with most of that, except when I was in the army I was a beliver, but one with little thought. Since then I Have come more into line wth "The Friends" view on this.
With the proviso that the defence of the weak and innocent may be an exception. I would have to decide, and God make his Judgement on my choice.

Terry
________________________________


Blessed are the merciful, mercy shall be shown unto them.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
fromthe heart said:
The Bible also says to obey the laws under which you live...I remember those who didn't accept being drafted in the 60"s and 70's some went to Canada;some used religious reasons....My husband did neither..he served his country with a prayer of guidence every day of his service..he came home after 18 months of service with 2 purple hearts from injuries he'd gotten in a battle that was not of his making...he was not ignorant of his faith...he just obeyed the laws made by those who governed the country...God was with him all the same. He was placed by his field of duty in engineering,after he had a duce and a half blown out from under him by a land mine and his legs were broken he healed; still continued his tour of duty...when he was shot he mended and finished his tour of duty. He kept his faith that God would bring him home and God did bring him home. He never HAD to shot anyone...God kept him from being in that position by allowing him to be wounded....perhaps it's not quite the thin line as you might think about serving GOD AND COUNTRY!:)
My parents both 'did their bit' in WWII - Dad was invalided whilst escaping from capture; he risked immediate death if captured - as a Belgian soldier, his Country already invaded by the Germans - he would have been seen as a traitor.

He was a civil engineer career soldier - when the Germans first invaded Belgium, Dad was happy to help rebuild the bridges that he had helped destroy, to stem the invasion, because, in his eyes, he was still doing something positive for his country.

When the Germans instructed him to prepare bombs to destroy those same bridges in the case of their retreat, he deserted, and Walked to Spain....He had had permission to escape from his C.O, who wished him the best of luck. When Dad asked him for a resistance contact, he looked at Dad a bit strangely, and then said "Why, it's your Mother............". I feel so proud of him.:)
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
michel said:
To my way of thinking, I would not be wrong in defending my wife from a killer, but to defend myself ? - I am not sure I have the right to count myself as being 'more important/more deserving than another.................

It's not a matter of being MORE important... this has to do with the value of human life.

It is quite important/Christian to put another's life before your own... IN CHARITY... putting aside your own selfish desires to look to the needs of others first should not be confused with this issue.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The Waffen SS were following legal orders. They were in compliance with the biblical charge to obey your leaders.

Were their actions at Peenemunde (sp?) and Auschwitz therefore blameless?
 

KirbyFan101

Resident Ball of Fluff
I think you will find that the most basic instinct, self preservation will over-ride any and all relgious contradiction to fighting.

Sure, it all seems very easy to discount when the war is over in the middle east. But when enemy soldiers come knocking at your door, and you are put on the defensive as opposed to the offensive, only a coward would watch everything he or she has worked so hard to achieve be levelled to the ground.

Your religion might proclaim thou shalt not kill. But if someone points an AK-47 at your family, I guarentee that any normal citizen would kill that person given the oppourtunity.
Defending a family. Defending a country. It all seems to same to me.
 

DreamQuickBook

Active Member
KirbyFan101 said:
I think you will find that the most basic instinct, self preservation will over-ride any and all relgious contradiction to fighting.

Sure, it all seems very easy to discount when the war is over in the middle east. But when enemy soldiers come knocking at your door, and you are put on the defensive as opposed to the offensive, only a coward would watch everything he or she has worked so hard to achieve be levelled to the ground.

Your religion might proclaim thou shalt not kill. But if someone points an AK-47 at your family, I guarentee that any normal citizen would kill that person given the oppourtunity.
Defending a family. Defending a country. It all seems to same to me.

Great post.

People are always idealistic until they are faced with reality. That is the way of things I suppose. People talk about putting other people's lives ahead of our own. C'mon. I view my friends and family as equals, but my enemies...total strangers? Am I going to put their lives ahead of those of mine, my family and my friends. Not a chance.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I'm also in agreement with KirbyFan. Most people are morally immature. They delight in symbols and rhetoric and fervently, even violently, defend them. But they have no understanding of the ramifications of their beliefs and quickly retreat when adherence to them leads to psychically disturbing or frankly dangerous results.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
Seyorni said:
I'm also in agreement with KirbyFan. Most people are morally immature. They delight in symbols and rhetoric and fervently, even violently, defend them. But they have no understanding of the ramifications of their beliefs and quickly retreat when adherence to them leads to psychically disturbing or frankly dangerous results.
Quite; I don't honestly think any of us can KNOW how we will react in any given circumstance until it actually occurs.:)
 

enton

Member
EEWRED said:
What are your thoughts about the duality of a life devoted to being a religious person and also being a soldier? Is it hypocritical to be in hte military and to be a Christian? What do you think about a person who believes that the Bible teaches to turn the other cheek, and yet is a member of an organization that is agressive and violent by definition? Any thoughts?

I am playing devils advocate here. I believe that a person can do both and be in good standing with God, but Iwould like to hear some other thoughts on it.
Being an employed soldier and a christian dually is not a problem.Being a member of the Church of God International ( http://www.theoldway.org) I have brethren who are soldiers in the government but I see them active as christians.
 
Top