• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Hillary?

Natas

Active Member
Sunstone said:
Why do you think Clinton is evil incarnate?
Sorry about the delay. I had almost forgotten about this post.

I actually think Hilliary would make a fine president. I must have been overcome by my evil twin neo-conservative side. I have voted republican most of my life, but it seems the party took the wrong fork in the road to a good future for America with the election of George W. Bush.
I have always leaned to the conservative side of issues, but in my opinion, Bush is not a conservative at all. We used to make fun of the democrats for spending more money then we took in and running up deficits, but nowadays, the republican party puts nothing but deficits on the books.
 
I'm so sick and tired of having to judge sexual connotations into everything of less moral concern than the weather now that I find your concept of that woman president nothing less than fascinating. Let the truth that women are like the zeal of faith that tomorrow asks for a new friend, or that choice makes no judgment in the empirical realm of uncertainty for God's creation, become the meaningful.:jam:
 

JAHLion

Member
Greetings!

I pretty much despise the politricks of Amerika. I believe that the system of Amerika is so corrupt and horrible that only bad can come from it.

I haffi admit I would MUCH rather a good Democrat such as Hillary Clinton become President, then a person such as George W. Bush become President.

But all in all, typical Amerika is jus evil. They are babylon.

Jah Bless.

Ras Evan
 

Serpens

Member
If someone who advocates Communitarian ideals is elected president, I am moving to the United Kingdom. I hope this isn't too obscure.
 

Natas

Active Member
Christopher Krajewski said:
I'm so sick and tired of having to judge sexual connotations into everything of less moral concern than the weather now that I find your concept of that woman president nothing less than fascinating. Let the truth that women are like the zeal of faith that tomorrow asks for a new friend, or that choice makes no judgment in the empirical realm of uncertainty for God's creation, become the meaningful.:jam:
Well, I think I understand you don't care for Hilliary, but could you put the rest of your post in english?
 

Lindsey-Loo

Steel Magnolia
Ithink if Bush doesn't shape up his act (close the boarders, etc.) then he is going to give conservatives a bad name, and Hillary will have a strong chance of winning.

Of course if she does win, it would be my greatest wish to leave the country as soon as possible.
 
M

Majikthise

Guest
I always thought she was kinda cute, but , president? Not gonna happen.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
Natas said:
Well, I think I understand you don't care for Hilliary, but could you put the rest of your post in english?
Natas, don't bother asking. From every post I've ever seen of his that is about the most readable you will ever see. I've never been able to make heads or tails of pretty much anything he has written.:areyoucra
 

Natas

Active Member
Majikthise said:
I always thought she was kinda cute, but , president? Not gonna happen.
That's funny, after listening to some of his speeches, I thought the same thing about Bush in 2000. (Er, not the cute part.)
 
M

Majikthise

Guest
Natas said:
That's funny, after listening to some of his speeches, I thought the same thing about Bush in 2000. (Er, not the cute part.)
Somebody loves him.:biglaugh:
 

Natas

Active Member
Draka said:
Natas, don't bother asking. From every post I've ever seen of his that is about the most readable you will ever see. I've never been able to make heads or tails of pretty much anything he has written.:areyoucra
Thanks for that. I thought maybe this post was beyond my cognitive functioning. (smile)
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
Natas said:
Thanks for that. I thought maybe this post was beyond my cognitive functioning. (smile)
Nope, you seem to be functioning quite well buddy. As long as you don't strain to understand what he's talking about you'll be fine.;)
 

Stormygale

Member
Hillary will become the first female president when pigs learn to fly. People don't respect her after what a laughing her husband made the US. It is hilarious to even consider that after all the US has been going through, they would stick another 'circus' in the Office.
 

Natas

Active Member
Stormygale said:
Hillary will become the first female president when pigs learn to fly. People don't respect her after what a laughing her husband made the US.
A lot of people wouldn't be so quick to judge her chances Stormygale. The fact is the country was in much better shape when Clinton was in office then it is now. Here are a few figures about Mr. Clinton and our current Mr. Bush...

Job growth: annual average (payroll survey):
Clinton: +2,835,000
Bush: -455,000

Economic growth (change in inflation-adjusted gross domestic product):
Clinton: +3.7% per year
Bush: +2.5% per year

Inflation (change in consumer price index):
Clinton: +2.8% per year
Bush: +3.4% per year

Median household income, change:
Clinton: +1.7% per year
Bush: -1.6% per year

Number of Americans in poverty (average change per year):
Clinton: -800,000
Bush: +1.5 million

Number of Americans without health insurance (average change per year):
Clinton: +145,000
Bush: +1,885,000

Federal surplus/deficit (annual average):
Clinton: +$5 billion
Bush: -$350 billion

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Census Bureau, White House Office of Management and Budget, National Assn. of Realtors.


"It is hilarious to even consider that after all the US has been going through, they would stick another 'circus' in the Office."

I and a lot of Americans would love to see this, 'Circus' come to town again.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
Natas said:
A lot of people wouldn't be so quick to judge her chances Stormygale. The fact is the country was in much better shape when Clinton was in office then it is now. Here are a few figures about Mr. Clinton and our current Mr. Bush...

Job growth: annual average (payroll survey):
Clinton: +2,835,000
Bush: -455,000

Economic growth (change in inflation-adjusted gross domestic product):
Clinton: +3.7% per year
Bush: +2.5% per year

Inflation (change in consumer price index):
Clinton: +2.8% per year
Bush: +3.4% per year

Median household income, change:
Clinton: +1.7% per year
Bush: -1.6% per year

Number of Americans in poverty (average change per year):
Clinton: -800,000
Bush: +1.5 million

Number of Americans without health insurance (average change per year):
Clinton: +145,000
Bush: +1,885,000

Federal surplus/deficit (annual average):
Clinton: +$5 billion
Bush: -$350 billion

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Census Bureau, White House Office of Management and Budget, National Assn. of Realtors.


"It is hilarious to even consider that after all the US has been going through, they would stick another 'circus' in the Office."

I and a lot of Americans would love to see this, 'Circus' come to town again.
:clap Excellent post Natas! I for one would love to see the "Circus" come back...bring it on!:jam:
 

Stormygale

Member
You must admit that NO presidency is without fault. You have only listed figures that show the upside of things. You probably got it off of some 'For Clinton Blog' or something. Figures that are FOR Bush are out there, too.
We are in the middle of a War people, and figures almost always drop during a war or any other recession. Economical sags as well as boosts do the same. Numbers that are down now, May be back up in six months. It's not written is stone.
Every president comes in with new ideas. Some like Health Care might work or not work. That is perhaps part of what is to blame now. Presidents are not perfect. Clinton had his faults. Bush has his faults. Doesn't mean a thing....
All Prez Hill can do is run around and speak for things that make her feel big, and that sound good to the liberal Americans.
If all of you want the world to set in their homes and laugh at us because the wife of a recent Prez gets in office, who could not keep his drawers zipped up, and keep cigars out of ....well, can go on ahead and 'hoot' for Hill. But, I for one, would rather another person totally new to get in office and get these darned Clinton's out of the picture. Clinton was making a laughing stalk of himself and me when he was 'screwing' around, and belonged handling the mess in Iraq for himself.
Because of him, and even Bush SR., the trouble we are having in Iraq had to be passed on to another Prez, sooner or later. It just happened in the third Office after it all began.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
I often have to wonder what is the big deal about Clinton's "zipper" ? So what? Who cares? JFK was notorious for sleeping around and he was one of the most beloved presidents this country has ever had. The personal relationships of our president should mean absolutely nothing in comparison to the political achievements of the administration and the leader of that administration. Whether one likes it or wants to admit it or not many good things came out of the Clinton administration. Things that had not ever been accomplished before. The fact of the matter is is that they knew what they were doing. Whether it was Bill or Hillary or the both together, obviously someone did something right. Why would we not want that back?

And as for being in a war right now...that is NOT an excuse for the drop in the afore-mentioned statistical proof...it is the cause...and the cause of the war is Bush. If we had went after the real perpetrators of the terrorism against us instead of going after Dubya's daddy's old nemesis then this would never had gotten this far. We HAD viable info as to the location of Bin Laden and just shifted gears to Hussein. We found him...why the heck couldn't we have found Bin Laden with less trauma? We could have. But that would not have put our country at war and make a name for Dubya in the fashion of his daddy. It is all about the Bush family vendetta and oil. NOT about the lives of those lost in the attacks of 9/11. Ever wonder why that stuff didn't happen while Clinton was president? ...Cause no one wanted to mess with Wild Bill! :jam:
 
Top