301ouncer
Well-Known Member
Most scholars don't believe the annynmous writer John (Gospel of John) used any of the other gospels as a source considering they have little in common and there are too many discrpancies between John and the earlier gospels. They are the most skeptical of John as well. Most don't believe any of the sayings in regards to Jesus's pbuh divinity to be true.
You can produce any earlier teachings of Jesus's pbuh teachings, apply it to the formula and the corruption become very clear and evident.
The main pillars of corruption the pharisee infiltrators introduced contridicts these same pillars of faith of earlier gosples of Jesus pbuh.
Whichever way you look at it the formula will always work and the research stays strong. Selectivity in picking and choosing of verses or none selectivity will always show the discrpancies between the gospels.
This is not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy fact. Evidence of perpertratues of corruption is very clear and evident.
Jesus pbuh himself warned of their evil desires, and their evil planning and plotting was also revealed in the Quran too
You can produce any earlier teachings of Jesus's pbuh teachings, apply it to the formula and the corruption become very clear and evident.
The main pillars of corruption the pharisee infiltrators introduced contridicts these same pillars of faith of earlier gosples of Jesus pbuh.
Whichever way you look at it the formula will always work and the research stays strong. Selectivity in picking and choosing of verses or none selectivity will always show the discrpancies between the gospels.
This is not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy fact. Evidence of perpertratues of corruption is very clear and evident.
Jesus pbuh himself warned of their evil desires, and their evil planning and plotting was also revealed in the Quran too