Viva asked:
>"Would it be fair to say that all evolutionists are essentially atheists[?]"<
It would probably be fair to say that most "western" cultures that retain large percentages of Christian adherents predominantly and/or primarily favor their own Creation myth over science/natural based explanations. But in being fair, one might also say that there are many "believers" (both Christian and non-Christian) that accept Evolution Theory as the "best" explanation that attempts to define our natural world (as the replies in this thread suggest)...as well as most, if not all, "non-believers".
Bear in mind that Evolution Theory does not *obviate* (nor discredit/disprove) the possible existence of god(s)...it simply doesn't *require* supernatural cause/effect as explanation. The evolution science is neither "pro-god", nor "anti-god". Only those that espouse the position of "you're either with us or against us" perceive a conflict with their faith or their understanding.
>"And would it not be fair to say that all atheists are bound to hell via the positions that the Creationists holds?"<
Is that your position?
1 Corinthians 2:11-14
Hmmmm...
>"Thus an Evil - utionists (I'm being British : ) - cannot speak intelligably[sic] on in the ultimate final conclusions of anything. via creationist's view point.
Right? is this fair?"<
"Fair"? That's for you to discern.
"Right"? Not really, no.
If we were to employ your rationale, we might equally conclude that no "Creationist" could intelligibly "speak" to supported conclusions offered by evolution science. While I would concede that many "creationists" don't display a particularly strong grasp of what evolution science IS (while evincing many gross misconceptions of what it is NOT), I can report that I have encountered quite a few "creationists" that can at least intelligibly discuss evolution science, even if they don't accept all of the conclusions that it may afford.
On the other hand, understanding Biblical accountings of "Creation" are not especially difficult to grasp or discuss from an unbeliever's perspective. You're welcome to argue that only the anointed and redeemed "truly" understand Genesis through "revealed wisdom", but you'll find that such arguments (ie, "You'll never understand until you believe") are not especially compelling or persuasive, and purposefully unintelligible.
"Science" is neither moral (good) nor immoral (evil), it's amoral; and THAT...I suppose, is "evil" enough for some...