Beaudreaux
Well-Known Member
You cannot disprove the existence of giant, flying spaghetti monsters that follow EVERY ONE of us all day and night. Your logic is insufficient. You must have faith in the GFSMs. Go ahead. Try to disprove them.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Disproving Giant Flying Spaghetti monsters with the laws of logic
- Thread starter Beaudreaux
- Start date
Andal
resident hypnotist
The question shouldn't be whether or not the Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster exists but if we can directly experience their influence on our lives
tomspug
Absorbant
I haven't noticed no Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster void where a Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster should be, nor do I see the influence of a Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster in the lives of others, therefore I find no interest in pursuing any claim of its existence.
Religions claim to actually BENEFIT people. Is that a logical explanation?
Religions claim to actually BENEFIT people. Is that a logical explanation?
Scarlett Wampus
psychonaut
If you only opened your heart to FSM you would see he is with you always, waiting to offer you wisdom. He has helped others. Ask those who have actually let in his benevolence and they'd tell you.
freethinker44
Well-Known Member
Before you can have faith in the spaghetti monster
First, you must know that he exists
something, something ... comsmic void
something, something ... monkey poop
Enough said. Spaghetti monster needs no evidence
First, you must know that he exists
something, something ... comsmic void
something, something ... monkey poop
Enough said. Spaghetti monster needs no evidence
Smoke
Done here.
"Claim to" being the operative phrase.
CarlinKnew
Well-Known Member
I don't buy into that whole "Fall of Pasta", "Original Appetite", "Meatball sacrificed on the fork", nonsense. The whole concept is illogical. Are the Noodle, the Meatball, and the Holy Sauce three separate entities, or are they different aspects of the same Spaghettihead? Doesn't make sense.
Beaudreaux
Well-Known Member
Please. Our religion is SO much better. Take communion alone. Christians: little pieces of bread and some wine. Pastafarians: Pasta, sauce and meatballs. No comparison.
Subhood
aintnopartylikeanopenbar
:biglaugh:
hahaha frubals are in order.
Beaudreaux
Well-Known Member
Who among us has not looked upon a sunset or a newborn child and not felt his noodly goodness? Your logic fails. You cannot disprove him.The question shouldn't be whether or not the Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster exists but if we can directly experience their influence on our lives
LittleNipper
Well-Known Member
The world isn't red like a meatball, and we don't either look like spaghetti, nor are we eaten as spaghetti... Hense no Spaghetti god, but atheists are simple in their stabs of illogic.
tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
Obvious proof of not only the FSM, but of [SIZE=+2]the previously unobserved species Noodleous doubleous.
[/SIZE]Origin of Noodleous doubleous
[/SIZE]Origin of Noodleous doubleous
Erebus
Well-Known Member
Ever seen a strand of DNA? Looks a lot like spaghetti to me... Quite obviously DNA is evidence that we were created by a spaghetti monster. The fact we aren't eaten as spaghetti proves the FSM loves us.
Oh yes, and the world wasn't created to look like pasta (you only have to read the gospel of FSM to know that).
RAmen