PHOTOTAKER
Well-Known Member
I came across this several months ago and fond out that it was a hoax or not true because the book or article dose not exist. I don't thinks it is going around the church as much as it did in the 1800's. but i did find someone else that had a similar article that i had the body of is the same but the intro is different.
i will post the introduction but not the rest to avoid this lie to spread.
"This article may be found in the Library of Basel, Switzerland. It was written by Litsus Cratius, a Catholic Priest, in 1739 and published in his works "Hope of Zion"
The Name Cratius i have found to be related to Roman history as a historian at the time. No catholic Priest by this name has been found. The church wrote an artical on this say that it is a hoax and no book has ever been found in the Library of Basel in 1908.
There are a lot of true coments of people waiting for a "restoration" i have found never to use them unless i can authintacat them. How ever it would be cool to authintacat this artical but i dought that it will happen "its just to good to be true" so keep this in mind if you hear or see someone with this document chances are it is not TRUE.
thank you,
Phototaker
i will post the introduction but not the rest to avoid this lie to spread.
"This article may be found in the Library of Basel, Switzerland. It was written by Litsus Cratius, a Catholic Priest, in 1739 and published in his works "Hope of Zion"
The Name Cratius i have found to be related to Roman history as a historian at the time. No catholic Priest by this name has been found. The church wrote an artical on this say that it is a hoax and no book has ever been found in the Library of Basel in 1908.
There are a lot of true coments of people waiting for a "restoration" i have found never to use them unless i can authintacat them. How ever it would be cool to authintacat this artical but i dought that it will happen "its just to good to be true" so keep this in mind if you hear or see someone with this document chances are it is not TRUE.
thank you,
Phototaker