Functionless
Nothing
Why haven't you committed suicide yet?
The gun jammed? No, actually I don't plan on it.
No arguments about morality being an illusion. Reality is a far more interesting question.
If all of reality is an illusion, why do different people have a consensus on what they believe their illusions to be? When I say that I see a chair, why would everyone agree with me?
Does this mean that people all experience a single illusion? And if this illusion is experienced in a communal manner, would it not be worth learning about the intricacies of the illusion?
A chair could easily be seen as a table, or a projectile, or firewood. It depends on the observer, and the label "chair" doesn't tell us what the chair is really, it only tells us what the chair is in relation to us. It is an inter-subjective label.
Sure, its "worth" learning about, but why is it "worth" learning about? Is it really worth learning about? You can't really will the desire, can you?
Because of the illusion that people are separate from reality. We particiate in that one in unspoken agreeance.
Sort of. I would word it this way: people are the illusion they are participating in.
I think it's worth participating in (if just to "be alive").
The illusion or reality? Or the illusion that is reality???
All of reality-as-we-know-it, including the illusions that we know, exists in the same way as the illusion-that-we-know (whatever way we imagine that to be).
It's more a philosophical question than one physics would deal with.
The world-as-we-know-it is composed of all the somethings rathar than all the nothings. "Mattering" and "not mattering" are something, too.
Yes, the "world-as-we-know-it", hence the problem of "knowing" the "world". Do you know the world?
Because the mind has been driven insane by stress.Why do something so cowardly, anyway?
I have a question for you, Functionless.
Have you read the Bhagavad-Gita?
No, is it available online? I might have read excerpts at one point, but I don't pay that much attention.