Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Linus said:Does the Bible contain contradictions? I believe that It does not. What are your thoughts?
Ronald said:You need to specify what Bible you mean and what contradictions you mean.
The Hebrew Bible is very painstakingly true to its original, any contradictions are time related.
The Christian Bible contains a multitude of scribal errors and blattant falsfications to lead the convert to believe what the writers wanted conveyed.
anders said:pah,
I missed your post with a few seconds. You are entirely right. Regarding the OT of BHS (the Stuttgart version I mentioned) vs. TaNaCh, on the occasions where I have checked the BHS against a Jewish TaNaCh copy, there have been no differences. They also contain the same books, no more, no less.
There are not only difficulties when translating. The absence of vowels in the oldest manuscripts and that fact that there are no spaces to indicate word separation makes it difficult already to interpret the Hebrew text. Add to this that manuscripts are handwritten and very old, and you can imagine the interpretation difficulties even if there is no dirt, creases, tears and so on, disfiguring the letters. But let's settle for the BHS when needed. The OT has enough contradictions, so we don't need to go into NT non-violence versus the command to sell your garments to buy a sword etc., not to speak of differences between the OT and the NT.
If you use translations (as I think he overwhelming majority of us has to), there are numerous problems because of the different language types. The Semitic verbs do not express time in the way English tenses do. Very often, it difficult to choose between "he was", "he is", "he will be" or "he has been", to take a simple example. However, these things do not explain the many cases of conflicting messages.
anders said:I just discovered a new one:
How could Adam and Eve possibly have known the difference between good and evil before they ate the fruit? They were told not to eat it, but they would not know that it was an evil thing to do. Accordingly, it wasn't reasonable to punish them.
Ronald said:The Hebrew writings will tell you how much Adam knew! Certainly not as the child your parents told "Don't touch" followed up with a smack on the hand. (Those unjust people!)
Forming conclussions before you have all the facts, is called presumption.
Ronald said:Pah,
Begin with the Chumash, the commentary will tell you Adam was not an infant, fully grown and with wisdom of the Torah, As you have read of the builder of the Miskan/Tabernacle, God endows special folk with His spirit to do, to say and to lead people in his will.
The Chumash says "Adam had the power to recognize the essence of every animal and name it accordingly."
This would be a good addition to the database.
Ronald said:Pah,
You asked, I provided, You are so right about Christianity not putting much faith in Jewish Commentary! Makes one wonder where the term Judeo-Christian came from?
Anyway The Hebrew people are without a doubt(Biblicly) Gods chosen people, inspired by God to provide these self same Christians their Bible, both Old and New Testaments.
Then to say the Hebrew people are not inspired, is tantamount to saying,"I don't believe God." Kinda puts you in Christian company, does it not? Shalom.