• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Women in Christianity

Montalban

Member
1 Peter 3:7
Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.

When I raised the issue of "Women in Islam" some thought instead to suggest that Christianity is 'just as bad'. I hope to discuss some issues here with regards to women in Christianity (and in doing so note that I am taking the Orthodox perspective as normative). (please also not that Biblical references can be checked at a good non-Orthodox site www.biblegateway.com)

A classic criticism is raised with use of "For the husband is the head of the wife." Ephesians 5:22-24. It should be noted that I accept that there is discrimination because men and women are different.

The idea of submission in this context is not of one party giving and the other taking at all, but of mutual obligations...
Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savoir. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church-- 30 for we are members of his body. 31"For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh."[3] 32 This is a profound mystery--but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.
A husband is to love his wife with as much effort as Christ loved us - even to the point of giving up His life for us. That's not a small thing to ask. Mutual obligations are repeated...
1 Corinthians 11:11
In the Lord, however, woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12 For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God.

"Christian women also exercised far more choice in whom they wed..."Carroll, V & Shiflett, D (2002), "Christianity on Trial: Arguments against Anti-Religious Bigotry", p4
It's mutual obligation. "In fact what distinguished Paul from his non-Christian contemporaries was not the patriarchal views he sometimes expressed...but rather his repeated emphasis on the obligations of husbands to wives." Ibid, p5

The Bible emphasises mutual obligations; Colossians 3:18 18 Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. 19 Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them. 20 Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord.

Returning to the passage mentioned first;
"1 Peter 3

Wives and Husbands

1 Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behaviour of their wives, 2 when they see the purity and reverence of your lives. 3 Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewellery and fine clothes. 4 Instead, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight."

In other words, wives be a model of virtue, so that should their husbands lose faith, the woman's strength of faith will win them back. Quite empowering, to suggest that women can be the anchor of a Christian family.
 

Snowbear

Nita Okhata
I thought this was going to be about the role of women in God's work rather than a reiteration of what wives are supposed to be to their husbands and what husbands are supposed to be to their wives.

Since I'm not a wife (or husband :eek: ), I was kinda hoping for a discussion about women in the church...... I'd start one, but I'm not very good at wording stuff in a way that gets people interested in discussing ;)
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
yah, so long as women keep quiet, subserviant and dressed 'modestly' no problems.

again, Christianity today is like Islam, influenced by the culture it is a part of.

according to Paul in Corinthians women should wear head scarves especally in church. If she isn't wearing something on her head you should shave her bald.
Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
11:8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.
11:9
Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

More Paul from Timothy
2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

no speaking, and no trying to be a mans equil... women are beneath men.

This is the problem with cherry picking... you can find anything you want if you look for it.
Is this the attitude of all Christians... NO!
Is this the attitude of some Christians.... YES!

Blanket statements about any religion are misleading.:cool:

wa:do
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
As a woman who grew up with a Christian background, I can only tell you my experience. I did not feel like I was the equal of men because being female we were treated as something "lesser". Women could not lead prayer, could not speak in during the service at all. Women could teach (babysit) young children, but older kids and teens were always taught by the men. We were told to submit to our husbands (basically be his slave). Women were not a part of any decisions other than what should be served at the Sunday dinner. Basically women were taught they were not as worthy as men, and were treated as such. I realize this is not the experience of all Christian women, but it was mine. One of the many reasons I am not a part of that anymore.
 

EnhancedSpirit

High Priestess
Montalban said:
1 Peter 3:7
Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.

When I raised the issue of "Women in Islam" some thought instead to suggest that Christianity is 'just as bad'. I hope to discuss some issues here with regards to women in Christianity (and in doing so note that I am taking the Orthodox perspective as normative). (please also not that Biblical references can be checked at a good non-Orthodox site www.biblegateway.com)

A classic criticism is raised with use of "For the husband is the head of the wife." Ephesians 5:22-24. It should be noted that I accept that there is discrimination because men and women are different.

The idea of submission in this context is not of one party giving and the other taking at all, but of mutual obligations...
Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savoir. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church-- 30 for we are members of his body. 31"For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh."[3] 32 This is a profound mystery--but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.
A husband is to love his wife with as much effort as Christ loved us - even to the point of giving up His life for us. That's not a small thing to ask. Mutual obligations are repeated...
1 Corinthians 11:11
In the Lord, however, woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12 For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God.
Colossians 3:18 18 Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. 19 Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them. 20 Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord.

Returning to the passage mentioned first;
"1 Peter 3

Wives and Husbands

1 Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behaviour of their wives, 2 when they see the purity and reverence of your lives. 3 Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewellery and fine clothes. 4 Instead, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight."
It is true that the word of God teaches equality of man and woman. This not however, prove that it was done, until Jesus came along, and then these were pushed aside again after his resurrection. Until recent history there was not equality between men and women. But I am very glad that you are pointing out that is the way God intended it to be.
 

EnhancedSpirit

High Priestess
Jensa said:
Ever read much about the various Native American cultures?
uuhhh, I AM NATIVE AMERICAN, and I understand what you are saying. There are a few cultures that gave women their due respect, but these were not the majority or the norm.
 

Montalban

Member
Snowbear said:
I thought this was going to be about the role of women in God's work rather than a reiteration of what wives are supposed to be to their husbands and what husbands are supposed to be to their wives.

Since I'm not a wife (or husband :eek: ), I was kinda hoping for a discussion about women in the church...... I'd start one, but I'm not very good at wording stuff in a way that gets people interested in discussing ;)

I'm sorry that you feel left out. However people rail against my long posts, so I try to deal with small bits at a time.

As you're so interested in the subject, why not introduce something on it?
 

Montalban

Member
Maize said:
As a woman who grew up with a Christian background, I can only tell you my experience. I did not feel like I was the equal of men because being female we were treated as something "lesser". Women could not lead prayer, could not speak in during the service at all. Women could teach (babysit) young children, but older kids and teens were always taught by the men. We were told to submit to our husbands (basically be his slave). Women were not a part of any decisions other than what should be served at the Sunday dinner. Basically women were taught they were not as worthy as men, and were treated as such. I realize this is not the experience of all Christian women, but it was mine. One of the many reasons I am not a part of that anymore.

That's just the 'problem' that Jesus made when He didn't consecrate any women to minister in the same way that He consecrated men.
 

Snowbear

Nita Okhata
Montalban said:
As you're so interested in the subject, why not introduce something on it?
Actually, In my own indirect way, I think I did just that. There are a few who have even answered :D

As is my nature, I'm kinda just kickin' back and watching the discussion for now. I have some thoughts, but wanna wait to lay them out... for now.....
 

Montalban

Member
Snowbear said:
Actually, In my own indirect way, I think I did just that. There are a few who have even answered

As is my nature, I'm kinda just kickin' back and watching the discussion for now. I have some thoughts, but wanna wait to lay them out... for now.....

Oh, go on. You've got me interested now. I don't want to hog the thread... as I seem to be doing. :eek:
 

Snowbear

Nita Okhata
Montalban said:
That's just the 'problem' that Jesus made when He didn't consecrate any women to minister in the same way that He consecrated men.
Oh really???
It seems to me that early in Jesus' ministry, when He revealed Himself as the Messiah to the woman at the well in John 4, she went into the city and told the men who He was and they all came to see Him. Surely He knew that's what she would do and if He didn't want her to minister to men, He would not have spoken to her as He did?
John 4:25 The woman said to Him, I know that Messiah is coming, who is called Christ. When He has come, He will tell us all things.
26 Jesus said to her, I AM, the One speaking to you.
27 And upon this His disciples came and marveled that He talked with the woman. However, no one said, What do You seek, or why do You talk with her?
28 The woman then left her waterpot and went into the city and said to the men,
29 Come see a man who told me all things that I ever did. Is this One not the Christ?
30 And they went out of the city and came to Him.
 

Montalban

Member
Snowbear said:
Oh really???
It seems to me that early in Jesus' ministry, when He revealed Himself as the Messiah to the woman at the well in John 4, she went into the city and told the men who He was and they all came to see Him. Surely He knew that's what she would do and if He didn't want her to minister to men, He would not have spoken to her as He did?
Christ's message wasn't resticted to men. Women served Him as well as Men.

The first to recognise Jesus was a man, Peter, and He said "On this rock (of faith) I will build my church". He then gave Peter and the other Apostles (all men) the power to bind and lose.

However, yes, His message was not restricted to men. He also said "Blessed are the children", and He praised their naieve faith, but I would guess you don't think that when He speaks of and to children that He was suggesting we have a 'junior minister' programme?
 

Montalban

Member
FYI
"Jesus Christ did not call any women to become part of the Twelve. If he acted in this way, it was not in order to conform to the customs of his time, for his attitude towards women was quite different from that of his millieu, and he deliberately and courageously broke with it.

For example, to the great astonishment of his own disciples Jesus converses publicly with the Samaritan woman (Jn 4:27); he takes no notice of the state of legal impurity of the woman who had suffered from hemorrhages (Mt 9:20); he allows a sinful woman to approach him in the house of Simon the Pharisee (Lk 7:37); and by pardoning the woman taken in adultery, he means to show that one must not be more severe towards the fault of a woman than towards that of a man (Jn 8:11). He does not hesitate to depart from the Mosaic Law in order to affirm the equality of the rights and duties of men and women with regard to the marriage bond (Mk 10:2; Mt 19:3).

In his itinerant ministry Jesus was accompanied not only by the Twelve but also by a group of women (Lk 8:2). Contrary to the Jewish mentality, which did not accord great value to the testimony of women, as Jewish law attests, it was nevertheless women who were the fist to have the privilege of seeing the risen Lord, and it was they who were charged by Jesus to take the first paschal message to the Apostles themselves (Mt 28:7 ; Lk 24:9 ; Jn 20:11), in order to prepare the latter to become the official witnesses to the Resurrection."
http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df76ii.htm
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
Montalban said:
That's just the 'problem' that Jesus made when He didn't consecrate any women to minister in the same way that He consecrated men.
Therefore making women unequal and in the view of many today, of lesser value. Actually, I don't blame Jesus for this, I blame the male-driven Christian church. There is no place for women other than the potluck serving line.
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
Maize said:
Therefore making women unequal and in the view of many today, of lesser value. Actually, I don't blame Jesus for this, I blame the male-driven Christian church. There is no place for women other than the potluck serving line.
Very good observation my friend.... I just read a book that you may like:
Transforming Grace: Christian Tradition and Women's Experience: HarperCollings, 1988) by Anne Carr.

She points out that many women struggle with the patriarchy, sexism, and adrocentrism in the church, but continue to call themselves Christian because: "the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.... has been, is, life-giving and liberating for women.(p. 160)".

Ms. Carr also does a wonderful job of looking at the male dominated church throughout history, being very fair (in my opinion) in presenting the good:
The classical formulation of Chalcedon speaks only of the divinity and humanity of Christ, not his maleness.
and the bad:
Aquinas's anthropology that viewed the male as "more noble" and women as "defective" human beings.

..... but Montelbon is correct (yeah, I said it;) ) ... it is important to go back to Christ and the early church and try to determine what Christ implied by only choosing male Apostles. This same Christ, a person who showed remarkable freedom and openness to women as evidenced in his inclusion of woman among his disciples, his friendship with Mary Magdalene, his positive use of women in his parables, and his breaking of taboos in speaking with the Samaratan and Syro-Phoenician women..... this same Christ CHOSE to exclude women from the Twelve.

So it's important not to confuse our Christology with our ecclesiology.... the Christian faith is quite open and loving towards women.... even if the churches have not shown the same amount of respect and love that Christ did, it does not change the fact that our FAITH itself is not negative towards women.... but that like in all things, our humanity in the years after the death and resurection of our Lord has fallen quite short of the mark.

Peace,
Scott
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
According to the Gnostic literature Mary Magdala was the most beloved of the disciples, the reasons for this are debateable, but elsewhere Yeshua says that Mary (because she's a woman and thus the inferior sex,:rolleyes: ) will become male (spiritually) so she can enter heaven as an equal to the male disciples.

If Mary was a modern woman i imagine she would have slapped her Teacher (had she heard this), but, like Maize said, Yeshua was a man of his times and can't really be blamed for his sexist attitude.

Personally i think men and women are equal in the eyes of God, obviously on earth there are inequalities but these are spread between both genders.
Any institution who insists on women taking an inferior role in society and religious life is, as far as i'm concerned, obsolete, the Church is an interesting and sometimes useful intermediary between man and God - but it is not necessary. In recent times it has improved its attitude toward women with female ministers etc, but there is still further to go - if it can't go as far as the people want, then more people will turn away from it.
 

EnhancedSpirit

High Priestess
I think our biggest set back has been that you guys just had such a hard time forgiving us for that apple thing. Women have been persecuted for so many years because it's all our fault.

Well, guys get over it, cause if it wasn't for us, you would still be running around nekkid in the woods instead of sitting on the couch, drinking beer, and watching football:jiggy:
 

Montalban

Member
[/size said:
Halcyon]According to the Gnostic literature Mary Magdala was the most beloved of the disciples, the reasons for this are debateable, but elsewhere Yeshua says that Mary (because she's a woman and thus the inferior sex,) will become male (spiritually) so she can enter heaven as an equal to the male disciples.


According to some Gnostics, indeed, but these are not reliable sources for a subject on Women in Christianity.
[/size said:
Halcyon]If Mary was a modern woman i imagine she would have slapped her Teacher (had she heard this), but, like Maize said, Yeshua was a man of his times and can't really be blamed for his sexist attitude.


It is not sexist to admit differences. It is sexist to treat people with less respect because of these differences.
[/size said:
Halcyon]Personally i think men and women are equal in the eyes of God, obviously on earth there are inequalities but these are spread between both genders.


Indeed, this is a Christian view. Men and women are equal, but have different roles. St. Paul said that to God

Colossians 3:11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
[/size said:
Halcyon]Any institution who insists on women taking an inferior role in society and religious life is, as far as I’m concerned, obsolete, the Church is an interesting and sometimes useful intermediary between man and God - but it is not necessary.


That would be to assume that a woman’s role in Christianity is inferior.

[/size said:
Halcyon]In recent times it has improved its attitude toward women with female ministers etc, but there is still further to go - if it can't go as far as the people want, then more people will turn away from it.
[/size said:
 
Top