Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can't help but recall a section in a pulp-SF book "The Man Who Folded Himself" (great book, by the way). The man has a time machine, and one of the many things he decides to do is go and save Jesus, and the world ends up completely different - the world is smaller, less technologically-advanced, much more backward socially, and no one speaks English. Whether this is the actual case or not is questionable, but the point about the crucifiction being a crucial point in history is made. The main character then has to go back to his past self, and convince himself not to save Jesus.
So, like the character in the book, I would not do this, because such an action would have quite an effect on society today, and I cannot anticipate whether said changes will be better or worse.
I might save him...might. Have to go with Storm on whether or not he wants to be saved.
Yeah, I would save him.
And after words I would tell him that suicide is a sin.
If Jesus is god and God is Jesus and God is all knowing, then where is the sacrifice?I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep...The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my lifeonly to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father. (John 10:11,17-18)
yet therein is the mystery and joy of the resurrection. and the mystery of God's love incarnate, through which even death is conquered. Jesus lay down His own life- not out of despair or insanity, but out of love, and an understanding of His Father's plan.
He lay down His life to take it up again, that because He lives, we might live too. a new life as His born-again disciples while on this earth, and eternal life in His kingdom when we die.
and for those who say, understandably, that only a monstrous God would put the sins on an entire race on a single innocent man, remember that Jesus and the Father are One. they share in the same divine nature, person, and attributes. the God of heaven and earth also suffers and trembles as His Son dies on the cross. the crucifixion only makes sense if it is God Himself on the cross, suffering and giving of Himself out of love for us.
There's a argument to be made for leaving the past alone, even if we actually had the means to change it, but there are things I would change without hesitation if I could. An extreme example is the Holocaust, but there are other things, too. I'd prevent the Norman Conquest of England if I could, even knowing that it was part of the chain of events that made my birth possible.I can't help but recall a section in a pulp-SF book "The Man Who Folded Himself" (great book, by the way). The man has a time machine, and one of the many things he decides to do is go and save Jesus, and the world ends up completely different - the world is smaller, less technologically-advanced, much more backward socially, and no one speaks English. Whether this is the actual case or not is questionable, but the point about the crucifiction being a crucial point in history is made. The main character then has to go back to his past self, and convince himself not to save Jesus.
So, like the character in the book, I would not do this, because such an action would have quite an effect on society today, and I cannot anticipate whether said changes will be better or worse.
If Jesus is god and God is Jesus and God is all knowing, then where is the sacrifice?
If Jesus knew he was to be resurrected, what was sacrificed?
But there's also the changing the future aspect to consider. I don't know how my theoretical time machine works. It might create parallel universes for every action you take, as the time-travel belt in "The Man Who Folded Himself" did, which make paradoxes possible. Or it might change a single timeline, which means I might end up not being born, because the events resulting from Jesus's crucifiction lead to my parents being born.
That sounds like a conversation out of "The Big Bang theory."
Butterfly effect: If I'm that far back in time, pretty much anything that I do is going to irrevocably alter history. Accidentally bumping into a single centurion will cause a slight change in his biological process, meaning that a different sperm cell of his meets his wife's egg, meaning that all of his descendants are different. Multiply that by everyone I end up coming into contact with.
But there are some things that are like butterflies affecting the future, and others like tornadoes.
And yet the butterfly effect says that a flap of the wings can eventually cause a tornado.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail...