Then we are left with a discrepancy. Berachiach Ben Yisrael suggest that this "beloved disciple" could have been the son of Mary (his mother). This is plausible. The brother could have lived by and took the mother to his home to spare her the sight of her other son on the cross. Verse 26 and 27 does seem to be Yeshua saying to his mother that the disciple is her son then he turns to the disciple and says this is your mother then the disciple within the hour, while Yeshua was still alive on the cross, takes his mother to his home and then some time after that Yeshua receives something to drink then he's dead (appeared to be).
We must also realize which book of the NT we're getting this information from. It is the later of the four gospels. It has information in it that was not present in the previous ones. In this one "beloved disciple" is mentioned where as the others are silent on this charachter. The spear poking in Yeshua's side is not mentioned in the others. What has happened is that these "different" versions have been mingled into one story.
It's always been and interesting story to me. My position is far different than others when examining the events. I think, just by observing the text, that the biblical Yeshua was in the crowd of people but they didn't know he was there until he greeted them. They thought they were seeing a spirit because their understanding of resurrection was that it is to be a spiritual event. Yeshua informs them he was no spirit and invites them to feel his hands and his feet to show he was no spirit. This is pretty much what (HE) said. I find it interesting he could conquer death but not hunger. He asks them if there is any food there and they gave him broiled fish and a piece of honeycomb and he ate it. I think the rumors of his death had been exaggerated and since these disciples weren't there they heard the rumors and believed he was.
We know near to nothing of Joseph the older of Mary's other two biological sons, except that he was the older brother of James the younger of Mary's three biological sons, and is believed to be the son and namesake of his Father Joseph the son of Jacob, a descendant of Solomon, as distinct from Joseph the son of Heli, who is the biological father of Jesus and a descendant of Nathan the priest, who was a son of Uriah and Bathsheba the daughter of Ammiel the son of Obed-Edom a desendant of Moses the Levite through his second wife, who was Jephunneh the mother of Caleb and the daughter of Hobab, one of the two fathers in law of Moses.
If as suggested by Berachiach Ben Yisrael,that James the younger of the three sons of mary, who was the biological son of Alpheaus who is also called 'Cleophas,' which is an abbriveation of Cleopatros the masculine of Cleopatra, and Cleophas, who was also the father of Simeon who succeeded to the episcopal throne of the church of the circumcision after the death of James his half brother, who died at the hands of the same Saduccee sect that had Jame's full brother Jesus, murdered.
And as Cleophas was the husband of Mary at the time of the crucifiction, and there is no mention of the death of Joseph the step Father of Jesus, I tend to believe that the woman who was accused of having been caught in the very act of adultry by those Jewish authorities who were always searching for ways to trap Jesus with his own words and accuse him, was in fact, the mother of Jesus who had married Cleophas while her original husband Joseph, who it would seem had divorced Mary, was still alive thereby making her an adultress according to the new teaching of Jesus, that if a person remarried while their original spouce was still alive, they were then guilty of commiting adultry.
But back to the question in hand, if we were to believe that James the younger was the beloved disciple of his brother Jesus, then we're still stuck with the same problem, as it would appear that James, as with all the sons of the family of Mary and Cleophas, all lived up in Galilee, that is, apart from Joseph the brother of Jesus and James the younger, who could have been the Joseph from Arimathea, who laid the body of Jesus in his own family tomb which had never been used.
And it could be argued of course that John, who Jesus had surnamed 'Son of Thunder,' is one and the Same as John who was surnamed 'Mark,' which name means 'Hammer' and that Mary the mother of John who is surnamed Mark, whose brother or half brother is Joseph the Levite from Cyprus who was surnamed 'Barnabus,' is actually Mary the mother of Jesus, who, for the sake of her son Jesus, who told her to go and sin no more, stopped living with her legal husband 'Cleophas' and his sons. We know that Barnabus took his half sister Mary and John surnamed Mark, with him into the land of Pamphilia, and that the graves of Mary and John can still be visited in the town of Epheaus, to this very day.
Last edited: