• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Humans Be Monogamous?

Dunemeister

Well-Known Member
Assuming monogamy means one only, and not just one at a time, here are my two bits:

1. Monogamy is healthiest, for one thing. If you've ever had only one sexual partner, and this is true also of your partner, there is almost zero chance of getting a sexually transmitted infection.

2. For another, it provides the most stable context in which to rear children, the natural result of sexual activity (assuming all the plumbing works). If children are not at issue, see 1.

3. Relationships just seem to work best that way. Whether biological or not, humans seem to expect faithfulness and long-term commitment from their partners. Recently, the latter expectation has taken a beating, but even though people are aware that 50% of American marriages end in divorce, almost 100% of people in relationships expect their partners to remain faithful and to stay with them for an undefined long haul, and if pressed, usually assume a serious relationship implies growing old together, whether there are children or not.

4. The happiest people overall are those who have been married a long time (i.e., are elderly). I can't cite the study, but I heard this on CBC news a short while ago, so it must be true. :)
 

Elessar

Well-Known Member
Honestly, I think its the best form of relationship. But it's none of my business what other people see fit to do - I think polygamy, in all forms, should be legal (of course, only between consenting adults)
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen

Zatarra

Dauphin
If they want to be. It's up the individual.

If I make a promise to be monogamous, I should keep it or inform my partner that I no longer intend to. If you don't want to be monogamous, don't make that promise.
 

Nanda

Polyanna
Only if they want to be. People who want monogamy should definately be monogamous; they'll be miserable otherwise.

There are no doubt, benefits to monogomy but I'm sure those who choose multiple partnerships can claim the same.

For example, more loving hands to help raise the children, more incomes to help maintain the household, more people to divide the chores between, and more people to love and keep you company.
 

Elessar

Well-Known Member
I would only be a monogamist because, really, I still am trying to figure out how to buy ONE diamond ring when the time comes, much less two or three... :)
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Assuming monogamy means one only, and not just one at a time, here are my two bits:

If that's how you define mongamy, I'd vehemently disagree. I'm very happy being in an exclusive relationship with one woman, but if I had stuck with the very first girl I ever fell for, I'd be miserable.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
If that's how you define mongamy, I'd vehemently disagree. I'm very happy being in an exclusive relationship with one woman, but if I had stuck with the very first girl I ever fell for, I'd be miserable.

I'd be miserable if I'd stuck with the first three women I fell for.
 

lamplighter

Almighty Tallest
Only if they want to be. People who want monogamy should definately be monogamous; they'll be miserable otherwise.



For example, more loving hands to help raise the children, more incomes to help maintain the household, more people to divide the chores between, and more people to love and keep you company.
One could also say, more children, more debt (i.e. more food to buy, more electricity, more water, etc.), the bigger the chores become, and more people to bother you when you want privacy, more compromise on what movies/TV shows to watch, and more drama. Also what happens when someone no longer wants to be part of the family? What happens to the children during divorce, who shares the children if multiple divorces from the same family occur? What happens if someone new comes into the family, especially in a situation where they feel like more of a replacement, what happens if they don't show as much of an interest in the children as the others? What about the fact that most homes were never designed for polygamous families, how do you handle the shortage in space you might run into (depending on the size of the family)?
 

Mathematician

Reason, and reason again
1. Monogamy is healthiest, for one thing. If you've ever had only one sexual partner, and this is true also of your partner, there is almost zero chance of getting a sexually transmitted infection.

Statistically that might be true simply because there are less people involved, but it looks as if you're asserting that polygamous relationships are also open relationships. The two are different. As I said there could be some input into 2 or more romances, but the significance would be little.
 

Nanda

Polyanna
One could also say...

One could also point out the many negatives of monogamous living, but I didn't think that was what we were getting at. Let's be honest, no relationship is going to be easy or perfect, regardless of how many people are involved.

more children

Not necessarily. When one woman has multiple male spouses, she's not going to be able to have any more babies than she could have with one spouse.

more debt (i.e. more food to buy, more electricity, more water, etc.)

Only with more dependents. If all the able-bodied adults in the house have jobs, the debt is about the same. Or less, depending on how many children you have.

the bigger the chores become

But there's more people doing them, so again, it evens out.

and more people to bother you when you want privacy

True, but if you really wanted privacy, having children at all is a bad idea to begin with, multiple partners or no.

more compromise on what movies/TV shows to watch

Seriously? First off, what household doesn't have more than one television these days? And even if you don't, that's hardly a reason to stay monogamous. I mean, if that's the worst you have to deal with, you've got it made. If a person's that incapable of compromise, maybe they should just stay single. :areyoucra

and more drama.

Heh. That would depend largely on the people involved in the relationship, wouldn't you say? My homelife is very quiet and "boring," while some of my monogamous friends could headline on Jerry Springer, if you know what I mean.

Also what happens when someone no longer wants to be part of the family?

The same thing that happens to monogamous couples.

What happens to the children during divorce, who shares the children if multiple divorces from the same family occur?

That would have to be worked out by the people within the family, just like in any divorce. It's not always as complicated as you'd think; just like regular divorces are not always as simple and straightforward as you'd think.

What happens if someone new comes into the family, especially in a situation where they feel like more of a replacement, what happens if they don't show as much of an interest in the children as the others?

How is this any different than a new stepmom or dad that does the exact same thing? These problems are not at all unique or exclusive to poly people.

What about the fact that most homes were never designed for polygamous families, how do you handle the shortage in space you might run into (depending on the size of the family)?

What about monogamous families that take in both grandparents? Or both sets of grandparents? What about monogamous families that have lots of kids? You get the biggest house you can afford. The difference between a poly family and the first two examples, however, is that with more working adults, it's easier to afford that bigger house.
 

Japaholic

Member
I think its down to the individuals concerned. I reiterate that this is only my humble opinion and I mean no offence.......

I think that gay or straight a monogamous relationship is a by product of true love.

I had hit 30 before I had the personal epiphany that half the humans on this planet have breasts and a vagina. I had to stop looking for a pretty body so to speak and concentrate on finding a pretty soul.

I have done that and have found a wonderful partner with whom I am completely in love after 4 years of marriage.

Because I feel that way about her I don't want to have sex with anyone else, no one flicks my switch upstairs as much as she does. Perhaps I could find a younger, more attractive model so to speak, but to what end?

I met a triangle before who claimed all 3 were as equally in love with each other. However on closer inspection anyone with an ounce of sense can spot the baggage that lies within. It wasn't true love by pure definition.

Should my wife die I would seek the same again because it has been so rewarding in every sense.

I believe we learn from experience and monogamy works for me. I'll never try the alternative because of all the petty jealousies that would lie beneath the surface. Polygomy would only stand a chance of working in a utopian fantasy.

I think it was Bill Cosby who said "Having a child is surely the most beautifully irrational act that two people in love can commit"

Sex creates that and I think God drives us to that as well. If not the human race wouldnt be.

I think (again in my humble opinion) that a child needs 2 parents, 1 male and 1 female to create a balanced adult and that any deveation from that affects the childs psychology.

I think that a lot of societys problems are coming from a devation from that natural norm.

Thats not to say I dont think 2 men or women or combinations of therin can raise a child into a balanced adult. The natural order is still man+woman=baby

I believe God gave us choices, I choose monogamy because its right for me and my wife.

More than us, the 2 people in the relationship it is right for the small human we have created within our monogamous relationship.

That now takes presidence else her psychology as an adult will be affected.
 

Nanda

Polyanna
I met a triangle before who claimed all 3 were as equally in love with each other. However on closer inspection anyone with an ounce of sense can spot the baggage that lies within. It wasn't true love by pure definition.

1. You can't judge every poly relationship by having encountered one.

2. How can you really know the quality of their love? You're not in their relationship.


I believe we learn from experience and monogamy works for me. I'll never try the alternative because of all the petty jealousies that would lie beneath the surface. Polygomy would only stand a chance of working in a utopian fantasy.

Just because this is the only way you can concieve of a poly family working doesn't make it so. My household is hardly a utopian fantasy, and yet it's a functioning household, full of love.
 

Japaholic

Member
1. You can't judge every poly relationship by having encountered one.

2. How can you really know the quality of their love? You're not in their relationship.

For one I am not judging anyone, if offered an opinion.

For two their behaviour and mental health is a demonstation of their hidden baggage and as you don't know who they are, you can't possibly comment. Having known them, I am atleast able to comment, to offer my opinion.



Just because this is the only way you can concieve of a poly family working doesn't make it so. My household is hardly a utopian fantasy, and yet it's a functioning household, full of love.

Again I did nothing but offer an opinion. Why so defensive?
 
Top