Jeremiah
Well-Known Member
The topic of homosexuals was bound to arise but the nature of the OP. But if you have a problem with a post then report it.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Should Heterosexuals Be Allowed to Breed?
- Thread starter Sunstone
- Start date
The topic of homosexuals was bound to arise but the nature of the OP. But if you have a problem with a post then report it.
GiantHouseKey
Well-Known Member
By homosexuals breeding, I mean two homosexuals of the same gender. Two males or two females. But my main point is that heterosexuals are not the cause of the problems of the world. Sure heterosexuals can do harm, but does that mean they wouldn't do as much harm if they were homosexual?
I think your logic on this one is flawless. It is very clear and indisputable that most of the major problems that people face are caused by people, and most people are caused by heterosexual breeding, therefore most of the problems are caused by heterosexual breeding.
Of course there is definitely something very very wrong with this idea. But it is not the logic.
Of course there is definitely something very very wrong with this idea. But it is not the logic.
Jeremiah
Well-Known Member
"By homosexuals breeding, I mean two homosexuals of the same gender. Two males or two females."
I think we all know that same gender sex will not produce offspring. But thanks for pointing out the obvious.
"but does that mean they wouldn't do as much harm if they were homosexual?"
Perhaps. Although I don't think we have enough information to really answer that question. What does the position of being homosexual commonly do to a person and why? What does the position of being a heterosexual commonly do to a person and why? And what overrides both agents? Are the positions even the true source?
GiantHouseKey
Well-Known Member
Yes thanks, there is really no need to be like that. Obviously you, as well as everyone else, knew that. So why do you need to be so rude about it. Which brings me back to my point: Heterosexual breeding (The type between 2 people of opposite genders) is necessary for the succession of life, which again is obvious. If heterosexuals did not breed, there would be no life. If homosexuals bred with people of other genders they would not be homosexual, at least not fully.
And if you knew what I meant from my first post, why bother arguing it.
Just a question, no offence mean
GhK
Jeremiah
Well-Known Member
fantôme profane;1384791 said:
I consider it flawed because it only pertains to heterosexual breeding. If two homosexuals have a child says a gay man and a gay woman there is no promise simply because they are gay that their offspring will turn out significantly different then a heterosexuals offspring. Really if he had said just breeding then it would be flawless. It's not the element of heterosexuality it something else that is independent of gender preference of the parents. I suggested just natural stupidity which could happen in either homosexual breeding or heterosexual breeding.
Zatarra
Dauphin
I really don't understand why you don't understand my repeated point: A homosexual can choose to have sex with a person of the opposite sex without being at all sexually attracted to them. It happens.
Zatarra
Dauphin
If breeding means producing offspring by natural methods, then two members of the same sex cannot breed.
If breeding means producing offspring by any method, then the offspring from two members of the same sex would be no less harmful to the planet than any other offspring.
Either way, the question as posed is not at all productive.
If breeding means producing offspring by any method, then the offspring from two members of the same sex would be no less harmful to the planet than any other offspring.
Either way, the question as posed is not at all productive.
GiantHouseKey
Well-Known Member
Oh right, sorry! Of course, yes I understand your point entirely. But what I dont understand is how, somehow, heterosexuals should not be allowed to breed and yet people that are not sexually interested in eachother can breed and because of their sexuality somehow product children that would be any different.
GhK.
Trey of Diamonds
Well-Known Member
Have you read the Forever War by Joe Haldeman? One of the solutions for over population was creating a culture that was predominately homosexual. Is this sort of solution what you're thinking of?
Ozzie
Well-Known Member
Only a select homoerotic population of homeless hunter-gathers should be allowed to breed amongst a captive heterosexual population.
Interesting. But I think the flaw is so much bigger than that, so much more fundamental.
If only homosexuals were allowed to breed then we would have much fewer people breeding, resulting in much fewer people. If people are the cause of the problems then fewer people would result in fewer problems. The logic is still flawless
And the idea is still flawed.
Ozzie
Well-Known Member
We should put them in charge of all breeding since they are doing such a good job running the Child Support Agency:sarcasticthat's actually what I meant to say.
the Child Suppot Agencies are being run by a select homoerotic population of homeless hunter-gathers?
I thought all beurocracies were being run by soulless, androgenous, mis-anthropic androids.
Ozzie
Well-Known Member
Just wait till you get to know them.
Jeremiah
Well-Known Member
fantôme profane;1384837 said:
As I said in my first post I believe this approach is only a work around not an actual resolution to the problems. The problems would still persist there would just be fewer initiators. Really though I don't know enough about the nature of humankind to guess at what a steep decline in population would do. It could end up doing more harm then good. Fewer initiators also means fewer resisters.
You have no playfulness. I'm sorry for you.