• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Chaoism

What is Chaoism?
Chaoism is a form of esoteric or magickal practice designed to strip away all of the dross from the various forms of practice and retain what is useful and functional. It incorporates psychology, Kabalah, Hermetic Mysticism, Shamanism, Monotheism, Quantum Physics, and the ramblingsof one man generally regarded as the grandfather of it all: Austin Osman Spare.
A.O. Spare was a contemporary of Crowley's who believed, in essence that the theory wa sound, but it was being drowned out by it's ownpomp and jargon. He created a revolutionary concept called sigilization and brought psychology int the fold.
Chaos Magick is not about transcendence, though one finds one has evolved once one embarks upon his/her deprogramming. Chaoism is about results. Getting what you want, desire, need, etc...
Evolution of the self comes persuing these desires, for if one aspires to the wand, in Chaoist thought, one must weed ones garden.
The term Chaos Magick was not around since the inception of the art, but rather it was regarded as simply a streamlined version of existing forms of the occult. It's first true inception as a (dis)organization was with the Illuminates of Thanateros, an England based group led by Peter Carroll in the mid 70s. The term was coined by Carroll, or Frater Stakistikos (we do so love our pompos names)upon the writing of his second book on the issue, Liber Kaos. This is also when it had begun to take on a life of it's own.
Since then it has spread widely, though is still far below the numbers of Wiccans and Satanists (not to compare the two, you can put the hot pokers down now, both of you :p)
The IOT and many other Chaoist (dis)orginizations have an office called the insubordinate, whose job is to ridicule and question the leaders constantly in an effort to keep them humble and make serving ones own interests innefective and highly costly in loss of face.
SO, back to this hodgepodge thing. How does that work? If a Chaoist thinks somethig has merit he/she will implement it. I have known Chaos Magickians who have done some amazing things with fictional sources such as H.P. Lovecraft's elder god mythos.
Most Chaoist have a secret agenda of self evolution on the back burner, but that is highly personal and not really a polite topic.
SO, how does one start down this path, you surely aren't thinking? Well, I am glad you didn't ask. It is best started with a training regimen eating up at LEAST an hour of the day. This time is spent staring at fixed points, minimizing breathing, not moving, trying not to think, chanting mantras. etc... This is the warm up act, as it is reasoned if you cannot discipline yourself to do these things you will probably self destruct and take out a number of other folks with you.
SO, what about God? Chaoists are agnostic at best. We appeal to various gods as suits our desire when working with psychological functions, but dn't really believe in any save in the capacity that human faith makes them real.
The basic gist of it is this: when you pray you are doing the same thing as a Wiccan who is doing the same thing as us. We simply attempt to make the process logical and scientific.
There are no moral guidelines. If one has the moral bearing of the common barracuda, one will likely be weeded out. Chaoists attempt to police their own so to speak. Ostracism works wonders for maniacs.
That is the gist of it, I will answer any questions as best I may.
 

Fra. Yndel

New Member
What can't Chaoists do after this "warm up"? That is my question in return to Mr_Spinkles. The incredible thing about magickal practise is that their are no limits. No one has ever become so advanced that they knew it all and discovered what we can and cannot do, there is always room to push the limits further. It could be possible to do anything, we just do not know until we try it. The exercises that Fra. Morelia mentioned are the simple daily regimen that all new initiates into the Chaoist philosophy do or should follow. It increases discipline and will become the basic building blocks for all of your magickal work. Trancelike states, chanting mantras, and entering a state of "no mind" will be important for your entire life as a magician...you never outgrow these simple acts.

Now as to your second question, here is where it gets fun. Because Chaoism has no set path that one has to walk we are free to "borrow" practises from other religions. If we believe that something another religion practises can be adapted and useful to our magick we will steal it. I have known people who adapted the basic Catholic exorcism ritual to their own method and used it very effectively. I myself have borrowed some things from the old Norse and Celtic mythologies in magickal rituals and it worked quite splendidly. There are even documented cases of Chaoists using fictional material such as books or movies and using them to great effect, I believe Fra. Morelia already made brief mention of this fact with H.P Lovecraft's books.

If you still do not understand at all what we seem to be rambling on about just keep asking us questions and we will do our best to answer. For everyone's information I am not a veteran Chaoist and do not know even a fraction of what Fra. Morelia has forgotten over the years. I am here to learn from him as well.
 
Fra.Yndel keep in mind that I have never even heard of Chaoism before. For example, you say "what can't Chaoists do after warm up?" but this did not answer my question at all....what in the world is "magickal work"? And what do you mean when you say Chaoists "use" something "to great effect"? What are you trying to do with these practices?

Also, does the "Fra." in both of your names have something to do with the Marines or something with Chaoism?
 
Fra. is an abbreviation of Frater, latin for Father, and is used sometimes by some schools/circles, to designate one who has accomplished much. 'Magickal Work' is a term that chaoists do not like, but find ourselves limited to. It is really rather snarky to speak of Magick,but there you have it. What better word is there? Perhaps we should make one up, I d not know.
Much magick is purely psychological, and most will never progress beyond that point. This is a stumbling stone that most new agers,for example, seem stuck at. All they can do is make themselves feel warm and fuzzy. As for exactly what the 'work' is: A Chaoist thinks that the Will can effect change. No, I will not/cannot/whatever prove it is possible. I have proven my ability to my satisfaction, Fra. Yndel has proven his ability to my satisfaction, and I would hope, his as well.
When I implement something I believe has merit, I do just that. When I find something in another faith/paradigm that interests me or might prve useful, even if only in a psychological sense, I implement it. I take itinto myself and and beliefs and use it until it is no longer viable. Then I discard it, consume another paradigm, s it were, and move on.
I have seen some amazing and hellish things that either brand me a lunatic, or a Chaos Magickian. Perhaps the two are inseperable. Mos tChaoists i know are at least slightly insane, but, frankly, it takes a touch of nueroses to eat other faiths and spit out the sour parts. I know this hasn't helped much, but I am trying to figure out how to explain it to someone who believes only in the temporal/scientific. Keep in mind that a chaoists believes in thesupernatural only when it suits him. We are masterful changelings at the least, mercurial and slightly....touched... individuals.
 
Hi, I've read the posts above. Chaoism sounds interesting. However, it sounds more like just a name for dealing with life from a purely commonsensical point of view rather than from the point of view of a set religion.

P.S. "Fra. is an abbreviation of Frater, latin for Father," - frater means BROTHER in Latin. Pater means FATHER.
 
Bah, I realized after i posted and logged for the day. Fra. Morelia was on the crack apparently:p
Yes, the general titles are Frater and Soror. Brother and Sister. I realized I had a big sucking hole in my vocabulary a day or two after I posted, but I figured someone would point it out quickly and painfully. I was right:p
I thought Padre=Father... spanish=like latin, hence latine, hence Pater = Father, Frater=brother, Morelia = Dolt.
 

Fra. Yndel

New Member
Way to stick Ye Olde foot in the mouth brother. :smile: I really like what dannyfrankszzz said about Chaoism because I try very much to approach the whole religion issue with as much of a common sense approach as I can. We use the term religion to describe our philosophy so that people that we are talking to know that we try to live our daily life by it and that it is not something that we just made up while drinking with the guys for laughs or attention.
 

kazzybro

New Member
Its rare i find something that fits my frame of mind. I am not big on joining groups but assorted Fra's....what exactly makes you a brother?
 

Sylvan

Unrepentant goofer duster
Its rare i find something that fits my frame of mind. I am not big on joining groups but assorted Fra's....what exactly makes you a brother?

It is actually rare are that I run into chaotes who admit membership in any kind of initiatory organization where one would acquire such a moniker. While the IOT and its membership was/is quite influential, due to a number of reasons I don't really meet people associated with the Pact anymore, certainly not in an official capacity. I think most of these internet monikers are self-assigned and primarily aimed at making fun of people with lofty sounding magickal mottos in the OTO or simply continuing the IOT naming conventions.

I help organize a "free-form" esotericism conference (on its fourth year now) here in pdx so I have a yearly opportunity to meet people from all shades and stripes of this "belief continuum". I think most chaotes of my generation have a deep distrust for group environments, so you would find yourself in good company here. There is one group I find interesting, but it is more of a network of artists who practice and associate themselves with a particular current than a teaching organization. Finding teaching organizations in the chaote model are rare, and I would examine with extreme prejudice the motivations and experience of anyone claiming to be such a teacher. Particularly if you are not meeting face to face.
 

Sylvan

Unrepentant goofer duster
'Magickal Work' is a term that chaoists do not like, but find ourselves limited to. It is really rather snarky to speak of Magick,but there you have it. What better word is there?

I like it fine. It has a good history to it, despite the reputation and association with assorted kooks peddling weak sauce. No need to reinvent the wheel as long as we keep making better engines. And its definitely about time we got off the fossil fuel of monomaniacal paradigmisms.

'Much magick is purely psychological, and most will never progress beyond that point. This is a stumbling stone that most new agers,for example, seem stuck at. All they can do is make themselves feel warm and fuzzy. As for exactly what the 'work' is: A Chaoist thinks that the Will can effect change. No, I will not/cannot/whatever prove it is possible. I have proven my ability to my satisfaction,

As have I. And agree that you can't or shouldn't prove it to someone else. They have to have the experiences themselves. By convincing people of the truth of your experiences you are just contributing to the semiotically encoded mythologizing narrative that traditionally surrounds the people who practice these arts, which in a term Carroll borrowed from Crowley, is some old aeon ********. We need to cut that out. There are better ways to do this, and so many mysteries in "To Keep Silent".

Not to say their aren't quite a few basically christian hoodoo practitioners, or petitioners of Santa Muerte who do quite effective magic all the time with candles and simple prayers. No need for a sophisticated paradigm when it works just fine.

A good friend of mine, who I introduced to this stuff long ago, is an interesting case study in what a chaos magic informed paradigm might look like. He grew up in a pretty rationalist home, and as a child remembers his father explaining the structure of electrons to him. He would dream of spinning atoms and their various orbits. Met me in college, a pagan who had just started into the chaos literature (Null & Psychonaut, Hine, etc..). We had a associate who did enochian stuff (a long story) and this friend was convinced by said associate to attend an evocation and ended up "touching" the spirit, changing his perspective on the relative reality of these things. Since said associate decided to integrate extremely unwise entheogen use into said evocations and became some kind of dark cacodaemon vortex we disassociated from his company. This friend (a biochem major at the time) later mastered a technique for using sigil magick to get out of chemistry labs quicker, enchanting the experiment to hit the correct reagent balance etc. He doesn't use any tools other than sigils and yoga poses. Keeps a correspondence with Carroll about his more recent equation centered writings (which I find totally incomprehensible), but finds most people who would publicly state that they were chaos magicians to be utter tossers and would never publicly define himself in that way. Although he will happily come to rituals and get down as long as he thinks they won't suck.

When I implement something I believe has merit, I do just that. When I find something in another faith/paradigm that interests me or might prve useful, even if only in a psychological sense, I implement it. I take itinto myself and and beliefs and use it until it is no longer viable. Then I discard it, consume another paradigm, s it were, and move on.
I have seen some amazing and hellish things that either brand me a lunatic, or a Chaos Magickian. Perhaps the two are inseperable. Mos tChaoists i know are at least slightly insane, but, frankly, it takes a touch of nueroses to eat other faiths and spit out the sour parts. I know this hasn't helped much, but I am trying to figure out how to explain it to someone who believes only in the temporal/scientific.

The more I study different traditions the more I think that rather than being some kind of innovation of the chaote mindset, this is just what "real magicians" have always done anyways. They just have a longer body of experience as to what maintaining traditions can get you in terms of power, and have forgotten how useful it can be to shatter all those structures and start again. I think this is also complicated by the existence of spirits, which I believe to have a literal existence outside of our minds, and enter into symbiotic (or parasitic depending on the entity or your mindset) relationships with these traditions.

Keep in mind that a chaoists believes in thesupernatural only when it suits him. We are masterful changelings at the least, mercurial and slightly....touched... individuals.

Here I have to personally disagree. I find the chaos magic paradigm to be a way of eventually explaining the mechanisms behind the "supernatural". Keeping firm the possibility that you are insane and this is all an elaborate figment of your imagination hahahahahahahahaaa is a powerful banishing tool but I have seen too much weird **** to spend most of my time there without seeming like a chump to myself and my spirits. But this is definitely just a me thing.
 
Last edited:

Adramelek

Setian
Premium Member
Chaos Magic can actually be practiced very simply for beginners, such as taking a different route to work or to home from work at the spure of the moment just as long as it doesn't become a regular daily "ritual" or habbit. Or even using a different brand of tooth paste once in a while, etc. Such practices are the basic elements of Chaos Magic which in itself is a very simple form of Magic. Some "Chaoists" attempt to make this form of Magic more complex than it truly is.

I would recommend Phil Hines book "Condensed Chaos" for beginners in Chaos Magic.

Xeper.
/Adramelek\
 
Last edited:

Sylvan

Unrepentant goofer duster
Indeed there are a number of streams to what might be considered chaos magic practice, which can be as complex or simple as you would like them to be. Speaking of deprogramming, a lot of people I know as well as myself have gotten good results with Undoing Yourself techniques of Dr. Christopher Hyatt (although do yourself a favor and avoid Urban Voodoo), which are based on practical applications of Robert Anton Wilson's elaborations upon Timothy Leary's 8-circuit model of consciousness. I would also recommend Hyatt's "Psychopath's Bible" as an interesting perspective on an LHP. These techniques have little to do directly with practical magic but rather a hard self-analysis of body consciousness and internal programming. I mention these authors because they seem to be a constant presence (along with most other New Falcon/Original New Falcon titles) in many "Chaost" libraries. The gateway drug here I think being Cosmic Trigger in most cases.

Condensed Chaos is definitely a good one btw, and one I started with myself.
 
Last edited:

Adramelek

Setian
Premium Member
This concept of "Undoing the Self" seems to me to be very reflective of what one undergoes during a paradigm shift. Such as the restlessness and uncertainty that I experienced as a child when my world view was transforming from a christian upbringing into my acceptance of my Satanic nature. And the completion of the psyche centric metamorphosis or transformation was followed by intense inspiration and exhilaration of life. I also felt the same experience during my paradigm shift from a LaVeyan Satanist to a Setian in my late teens and early twenties.

Xeper.
/Adramelek\
 
Last edited:

The Neo Nerd

Well-Known Member
Hi, I've read the posts above. Chaoism sounds interesting. However, it sounds more like just a name for dealing with life from a purely commonsensical point of view rather than from the point of view of a set religion.

I was a practising chaote for a number of years and i agree it is very commonsensical, which is why i embraced it, being all logical and rational myself.

But alas after a while of mocking xtians on this forum for their beliefs it occurred to me that i had to apply the same burdens of proof to my own beliefs and had to give it away.

I still hold it as a philosophical position and recognise the inherent psychological value of Austin Spares working with oneself.

-Q
 

Sylvan

Unrepentant goofer duster
But alas after a while of mocking xtians on this forum for their beliefs it occurred to me that i had to apply the same burdens of proof to my own beliefs and had to give it away.

I still hold it as a philosophical position and recognise the inherent psychological value of Austin Spares working with oneself.

Interesting. Could you separate for me the philosophical and religious beliefs involved in chaosm? Did you just stop believing in magic?
 
Top