• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

No Death Penalty for Child Rape!

Is the Supreme Court's disicion righteous?


  • Total voters
    26

Mike182

Flaming Queer
i don't think anything deserves the death penalty, so i vote yes, this is a step in the right direction.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I've mixed feelings on capital punishment. On one hand, I can sort of see it as one would euthanize a rabid dog out of mercy and necessity. On the other hand, how does a corpse learn its lesson? How does it reflect upon and reach the realization of its errors? How does a corpse come to know regret and remorse? Instead of being punishment, wouldn't death rather be an escape from it? Remember in the movie Kill Bill Vol. 2 when Beatrix plucked out Elle's last eye, rendering her blind, screaming and flailing about helplessly? Instead of finishing her off, she just turned away and left her there. Also, another problem with capital punishment is the chance of accidentally executing innocent people who've been falsely convicted. It's happened before. Unlike life imprisonment, you can't release and compensate someone for that kind of screw up.

Now castration for sexual predators I could fully support if only they could somehow guarantee it wouldn't happen to an innocent person by mistake.
 

Poisonshady313

Well-Known Member
I've mixed feelings on capital punishment. On one hand, I can sort of see it as one would euthanize a rabid dog out of mercy and necessity. On the other hand, how does a corpse learn its lesson? How does it reflect upon and reach the realization of its errors? How does a corpse come to know regret and remorse? Instead of being punishment, wouldn't death rather be an escape from it?
How about putting down a dog that has a habit of attacking people, simply because it's a threat to society (I've seen this happen). A person who commits a crime worthy of a death sentence is beyond learning, reflection, regret, remorse, etc... It's a dog that must be put down.

Remember in the movie Kill Bill Vol. 2 when Beatrix plucked out Elle's last eye, rendering her blind, screaming and flailing about helplessly? Instead of finishing her off, she just turned away and left her there.
So then, if this is what's acceptable to you, you would advocate the reform of prisons such that the worst of offenders who might otherwise be deserving of death simply be locked in a room, not given food, water, treatment, etc... just left to die.

I'll go for that... but you might have a hard time convincing some abolitionists that this is less cruel and unusual than simply executing them.

After all... Beatrix went ahead and executed everyone else, without just leaving them there.

Also, another problem with capital punishment is the chance of accidentally killing innocent people who've been falsely convicted. It's happened before.

On that same token, I bet there are some people serving life sentences who have been falsely convicted.

Perhaps you'd like to do away with the criminal justice system altogether... 'cause y'know... every so often they're in the habit of finding innocent people guilty.

If we can't apply the death penalty for that reason... why apply any penalty?
 

3.14

Well-Known Member
personaly think that killing a person regardless of his actions is wrong, (exept maby in cases where your life or multiple lifes are under threat by a lethal weapon)
this is because i feel that mankind has evolved to far away from animals to allow termination of inconviniences, instead of dealing with them.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
So then, if this is what's acceptable to you, you would advocate the reform of prisons such that the worst of offenders who might otherwise be deserving of death simply be locked in a room, not given food, water, treatment, etc... just left to die.

Anyone with a semblance of intelligence would know that's not what I was implying. The point was that in some cases being left alive can be a worse punishment than death.

On that same token, I bet there are some people serving life sentences who have been falsely convicted.
Yeah, but that mistake can be corrected; you can at least release and compensate an innocent person who as been imprisoned. You can't magically resurrect an innocent person who has been executed.

Perhaps you'd like to do away with the criminal justice system altogether... 'cause y'know... every so often they're in the habit of finding innocent people guilty.
If we can't apply the death penalty for that reason... why apply any penalty?
Princess, please! :rolleyes: Go take a nap.
 

Poisonshady313

Well-Known Member
Anyone with a semblance of intelligence would know that's not what I was implying. The point was that in some cases being left alive can be a worse punishment than death.
You assume that all criminals sitting in prison feel bad about what they've done.

When they get free education, free meals, free health, free room and board, free electricity, television, recreation, etc... it may not be a picnic, but compared to some people who are poor and struggling... it's something somewhat of an upgrade.

Yeah, but that mistake can be corrected; you can at least release and compensate an innocent person who as been imprisoned. You can't magically resurrect an innocent person who has been executed.
"Can be"... what about those who die in prison simply because they've served a full life sentence... and they did nothing to deserve being there in the first place. Can't fix that, now can you?

Princess, please! :rolleyes: Go take a nap.
Now that's just unnecessary and uncalled for. If you had no rational response, it would have served you better to just leave it out of your post.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I have mixed feelings about this.

On the one hand, I think the death penalty should not be used, so I don't think it should be applied to child rapists.

On the other hand, I think it's messed up that the penalty for planning and carrying out the rape of a child is less than the penalty for unintentionally killing an inmate in a prison brawl.
 

darkendless

Guardian of Asgaard
Once an offender always an offender. Punishment needs to make people not want to offend in the first place. Child rape is a terrible crime, punishment should make people such as this man afraid of being caught. I think death is an easy way out, he should be punished in such a way that he wishes he was dead.
 

Kungfuzed

Student Nurse
Most child rapes are committed by a family member. Would you want to put you father to death? Would you hesitate to turn him in?
 

Mathematician

Reason, and reason again
A person who commits a crime worthy of a death sentence is beyond learning, reflection, regret, remorse, etc... It's a dog that must be put down.
Hmm, for some reason two thoughts instantly came to my mind. 1.) The Shawshank Redemption 2.) this man.

The death penalty is a pitiful excuse for retribution with no demonstrable success record. A corpse does nothing for society other than take up even more land. Arguments have been made rapists may even turn into murderers with the knowledge of a living victim - if the outcomes are the same, why not just kill the person and save yourself more torment? Hopefully it will (once again) be struck down entirely.

It seems especially odd to me that people are breaking the old tradition of an "eye for an eye" (Gandhi's take is especially enlightening) by making the punishment for rape even worse than the actual crime - not to mention a child offender in America's prison system will likely be raped and/or incapacitated by fellow criminals.
 

Darkness

Psychoanalyst/Marxist
Sunstone said:
I'm glad to see the Court further restrict the death penalty.

Should it not be an eye for an eye?

Kungfuzed said:
Most child rapes are committed by a family member. Would you want to put you father to death? Would you hesitate to turn him in?

I might hesitate, but I would turn him in.

GeneCosta said:
The death penalty is a pitiful excuse for retribution with no demonstrable success record. A corpse does nothing for society other than take up even more land.

And a living criminal is a financial drain.
 

standing_alone

Well-Known Member
I think the death penalty should be reserved for only the worst of humanity (i.e. war criminals, say, responsible for genocide or other such atrocity), so I am okay with the court's ruling.

GeneCosta said:
by making the punishment for rape even worse than the actual crime

Whether the punishment is worse than the actual crime, besides being debatable, ignores the psychological effect of sex crimes on the victims that is long (life-long) lasting. Sexual predators are scum of the worst sort, in my opinion (I hate them more than murderers), and though I tend to oppose the death penalty (even for them), it doesn't mean I don't desire to rid the world of each and every one of them personally. ;) I just believe our justice system shouldn't be based on emotional, knee-jerk reactions. Especially if those administering justice have reactions anywhere like mine! :p
 

Neo-Logic

Reality Checker
Death Penalty is and should remain reserved for the most severest of crimes. Crimes of extraordinary cruelty or severity where justice cannot be satisfed by life sentences alone.

There are many things worse than the rape of a child - granted the act in itself is henious. To make Death Penalty accessible to the punishment of child rape underminds the now evolved ideology of why the Death Penalty still exists.
 
Top